Congratulations to those who supported Obama!!! To those who are
disappointed, be assured, he will be the President of ALL the people. You
will not be excluded!!!-:)
Congartulation for your new president , Let`s hope that he and all
American people will be wise enough to indeed make the world a better
place for all.
mirjam
Indeed.
Translation: US gelt he must continue to send to Ersatz israel already.
>Indeed.
His job would be easier if the fucking hebes learned how to behave like
humans.
Barack Hussein a Muslim Shabat Goy?! :)
The "Progressive" Globlisers in Washington will do anything to
entertain.
That's the way it works. Unfortunately.
Once again, you provide proof that you are a clueless blithering
idiot. He most certainly will NOT be President of "all" the people,
based on his word and actions over the years.
Mike Smith
> Once again, you provide proof that you are a clueless blithering
> idiot. He most certainly will NOT be President of "all" the people,
> based on his word and actions over the years.
So uh when are you guys renouncing your citizenship?
A truly great day!
--
--
Best Regards,
Evelyn
(Our) enemies are not man. They are intolerance, fanaticism, dictatorship,
cupidity, hatred and discrimination, which lie within the heart of man." --
Thich Nhat Hanh
Congratulations President Obama. He of course will be President of all the
people. Though I voted for McCain, I won't be like many democrats were over
the last 8 years saying, "He's not MY President".
John Black
"John Black" <jbl...@texas.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.237b6f8dc...@news.motzarella.org...
Good for you.
I admit I was one of those who said that.
But then Obama is a different kind of man than W.
You first.
I've never been partisan when it comes to presidents who start
unnecessary wars and kill and maim thousands of innocent people. For
example, I believe they should put both Lyndon Johnson's grave and
George Bush's grave under an outhouse in a national park and charge
admission to use it. That would help with the deficit too.
To refresh your memory, the war had large bi-partisan support (the list of
supporting democrats is very long), UN support (Resolution 1441) and the
support of a coalition of 26 nations.
John Black
The war only had bi-partisan support in the Senate and even that
support was based on deceptive intelligence. The Democrats in the
House voted against it. If it had been up to the Democrats, there
would have been no war.
Our traditional allies opposed the war and NATO did not participate.
Other nations sent token forces and were probably bribed, coerced or
intimidated into doing so.
http://www.tni.org/mil-docs/coalition.pdf
http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/aug/30/00017/
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/02/2262498.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_willing
http://www.accuracy.org/newsrelease.php?articleId=547
Resolution 1441 did not justify the war and the war was not supported
by the UN. Here's a statement from Kofi Annan:
"Iraq war illegal, says Annan
The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the
US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN
charter.
He said the decision to take action in Iraq should have been made by
the Security Council, not unilaterally." [. . .]