From
http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/05/23/magazine/SHIS23.htm
Cold front. It's all over for WPHL weatherguy Craig "Ironman" Weber.
Weber, who worked 114 days in a row after Julie Bologna left in July, was
told last week by management to look elsewhere, he confirmed yesterday. He
has no contract.
"I can't say much because my wife [Amanda] is five months pregnant and
I've got to keep working," says Weber, 47, who joined Channel 17 as a
part-timer in '96 after four years at KYW.
WB17 News at 10 news boss Rich Scott yesterday had no comment on Weber.
'PHL sources say the call came down from new general manager Leslie Glenn,
and may be the harbinger of more changes.
***********************************************************
Man - the guy works 114 days in a row and gets dumped? What the heck is
Channel 17 thinking?
Jim
-dave
Visit a journalist's website:
*** http://www.scoop0901.net ***
For Internet/Newsgroup access: extra.newsguy.com/gate/affiliate/scoops
++ Read my column about the state of men and modern medicine ++
++ only at: http://www.newsguy.com/features/scoop0901.htm ++
I would like to say for the record that while I'm sure it is stressful to
look for work when your wife is pregnant, I personally believe it is far
more stressful to look for work when you yourself are pregnant. Take it
from one who has been there!
-h.
--
hillary israeli.....................................hillary@netaxs.com
"So that's 2 T-1s and a newsfeed....would you like clues with that?"
hil...@hillary.net: for debugging your net or deworming your pet
Net Access...The NSP for ISPs....The NOC that rocks around the clock.
You can not possibly expect someone to respond to EVERY bit of unsolicited
email they receive. The guy isn't a major celebrity who can hire someone to do
it. Answering all email would probably be a full time job in itself. I guess he
should answer EVERY unsolicited letter he receives by regular mail, also.
Gould
>I know I sent the guy an email several months back saying how I enjoyed his
>work and style and asked a few questions only to be ignored. He never did
>answer his email...which I have a problem with. These people should be expected
>to have to answer their mail from viewers, not ignore it.
He may not have had access to the email account. It could have gone to a main
email account that was managed from the front office. That happens at some
companies. It's wrong, you're never told that, and a lot of people get the wrong
impression. Send a link to all the email accounts on the City of Philadelphia
site. Most of those accounts are receiving mail and the person has no idea how
to access the email. Tax dollars hard at work. The Free Library of Philadelphia
is horrible in this regard.
>Anyway, guess we'll never find out the real reason Weber was let go.
Probably not, unless he loosens his lips when he has a new job.
-dave
Visit a journalist's website:
*** http://www.scoop0901.net ***
For Internet/Newsgroup access: extra.newsguy.com/gate/affiliate/scoops
++ Read my column about the state of men, politics, and affairs ++
Hey, it's not like he asked for people to correspond with him. Would it be nice
if he answered, sure, but we don't know what was going on in his life at that
time that he might not have been able to respond. I know there are times that I
read my mail, mean to get back to someone, and forget.
As far as you GUESSING he receives less than 10, do you know for sure or are
you arbitrarily pulling a number out of your a$$.
Not as far as I know. It's just that well - I feel more sympathetic
towards the wife!
Gould
No need to worry, morons are not high on my list to worry about.
> I don't give a shit how many e-mails he
>gets from viewers, he should answer his mail.
Hey ghoul(d), I hate to break this to you, but what you think doesn't really
matter to a whole lot of people, myself included.
>He's only doing the
>weather for 5 GD minutes a day. What else does the man have to do but
>answer e-mail?
Maybe WB17 will release a copy of his contract and we can see exactly what they
were paying him for. Want to make a bet that answering mail was NOT in the
contract?
>For what they were paying him, he ought >to come to your
>house and pull your head outta your ass.
It's not my head up my ass, it's my foot up yours.
P.S. Why not try anger management, I have never met someone more qualified for
these classes?
Gould
L J Gould <lj...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:392DB17A...@ix.netcom.com...
Gould
Ghoul(d), the only thing I fear from you is if you would bleed on me after I
wiped the street up with you.
Big deal, the guy didn't respond to an email and some people make it out to be
the crime of the century. Now that he is gone, what are you going to whine
about now, or are you going to gloat in someone's misfortune because of some
perceived snub? Get a life.
Hey, isn't this the same mentality as those hollywood stalkers?
>Matter of
>fact, HE was the one who GAVE ME Webers email address because in my last
>email,
>I mentioned/asked something regarding Weber and I was told to write Weber
>directly with my compliment/question.
Maybe Weber thought you were the lunatic you appear to be.
> I have a real problem
>with these TV-types, with their big salaries, who rudely ignore mail/email...
If you found some real friends maybe then you wouldn't be harrassing strangers.
Then again, I can see why you don't have real friends to correspond with.
Why, what happened to her?
Her husband lost his job and she's pregnant. She's probably feeling the
stress more than he is! Heck, I can't even watch a Gap commercial without
bursting into tears. I practically had an emotional breakdown at the
Phillies game on Sunday - first because of joy over the grand slam, and
then because of anger at Jeff Brantley's pitching. If minor things like
this can destroy me (as well as most of the other pregnant women I've
known) I can't imagine how I would feel if my husband got fired.
Isn't it funny that some women want all of the equal rights, but let something
go wrong, and we should pity the woman but not the man. You are right, he's
probably at the bar drinking up the last of his paycheck while she is worried
how they will pay the rent. Give me a break. Like he isn't feeling the pressure
of losing his job knowing that his wife is pregnant and he has obligations to
meet. I wouldn't want to give him a stress test right now. I feel sorry for
both of them, for I am sure that they are both feeling a lot of stress
nowadays.
Jake
Newsanchor3 <newsa...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000525234723...@ng-bd1.aol.com...
You're being unfair, and reading into my post things which were not said.
I'd never dream of saying one should always pity the woman and not the
man. But pregnant women are physiologically different from non-pregnant
women and from men, and the pregnancy hormones have HUGE effects on
emotional state. I'm not expecting you to understand, as I certainly never
understood it before either! If she were not pregnant, I would think the
stress would be worse for the husband who lost the job. But since she is
pregnant and therefore physiologically prone to wild swings of emotion,
she's probably feeling it more. Take a look at the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis some time, you'll see what I mean.
Gould
Well, well, aren't you one bad-ass motherf...... If you ever lose your job
someday, I only hope someone tells you it's no misfortune.
Is it expected in his industry? Absolutely. But if you think that makes it
any easier to accept, or that it enables you not to worry about how you're
going to pay your bills, I think it's you who's a little out of touch with
reality.
Getting fired hurts, period. Wondering how you're going to pay your bills is
very real, period. Get with it, fella.
-d
Visit a journalist's website:
*** http://www.scoop0901.net ***
For Internet/Newsgroup access: extra.newsguy.com/gate/affiliate/scoops
++ Read my column about the state of men and modern medicine ++
Gould
How very nice of you to decide for people that losing their job is a positive
thing and that of all people to whom it happens, Weber is one for whom we
shouldn't feel sorry. Must be nice up there on the mountain, making all these
decisions.
<< I think mr. SSscold you are not in touch with today's business
environment. >>
Yeah, I guess I must be really out of touch: I'm self-employed (which you can
interpret as "can't find or keep a job") and I have companies - including
Fortune 500 companies - coming to me and asking me to take on projects for
them.
Yeah, really out of touch.
Gould
I don't give a damn about Weber's future. What concerns me is some bloodless
idiot like you coming in here and acting like losing your job is nothing - or
even a good thing. Where do you get off?
<< The question was, should he answer the unsolicited e-mail of his
viewers? >>
Is that the question? No, it's not: the question is your arrogance in
declaring his loss of a job "no big deal." Lose your job and then turn around
and tell me it's no big deal.
<< Just like Mr Mendte participates in this group. >>
Sorry, but Larry Mendte doesn't really "participate" in this newsgroup: he
responds, almost always defensively, when the company for which he works comes
under attack. He never initiates, never participates, never joins; all he does
is respond. Don't get so star-crossed that you can't see this distinction.
I have lost jobs. Yes, initially it is traumatic but it is by no means
the end of the world. I know people that worked at the same job for 30
years and lost their job. That's misfortune. A weather guy losing a gig;
where he needs to put in 5 minutes on air and maybe a few hours at best
off air and gets paid more than a guy that works 8 hours per day bustin'
it; isn't going to break my heart. It matters not how many times you
tell me I should care. I don't. Get real, people lose all kinds of
things. A job is on the bottom of the list. Lose your wife or your
child/children or your mother or father. These are real loses. That's
what is wrong with America today. Everything is considered a traumatic
experience. Everything isn't. Losing your job, especially a gravy job
like being a weather man, isn't the end. It can be a beginning. These
people are like salesman, they get kicked out of one house and they make
a big sale in the next. It's the nature of the job.
As for Mr Mendte, as I said, it's good PR. I call it participation you
don't. He didn't hurt his standing with me "participating" in this
group. He could be like Craig Weber and say nothing at all.
Gould
Yup, its the impersonal nature of this medium that brings
out such hostility. Some people think they're hot shit just
because they can insult other people without seeing those
people face-to-face.
Other people hit the SEND button, without thinking! It happens in real
life too, but you have a chance to redeem yourself before all hell
breaks loose!