I was glad to see this group but I was hoping there would be some content here.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

DoubleBitAxe

unread,
Nov 7, 2007, 10:56:39 PM11/7/07
to Philosophy for Children Google Group
I suppose I will get the ball rolling. I believe the most important
kinds of philosophical thinking we can teach the children of our
society are empiricism, critical thinking, and skepticism. It's too
bad Carl Sagan didn't write children's books. If you agree check out
the following website dedicated to teaching critical thinking skills
to children. http://www.criticalthinking.net.au/index.html
If you do not agree I'd love to hear why.

kiless

unread,
Nov 8, 2007, 12:48:16 AM11/8/07
to Philosophy for Children Google Group
...might be better to start off with a subject line that better
addresses the main content! :) As I contacted you regarding this post,
the group was only started this morning. So, you can consider yourself
to be the first poster.

On Nov 8, 12:56 pm, DoubleBitAxe <MichaelDFar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suppose I will get the ball rolling. I believe the most important
> kinds of philosophical thinking we can teach the children of our
> society are empiricism, critical thinking, and skepticism. It's too
> bad Carl Sagan didn't write children's books.

Actually, there's a great number of books for children, some produced
within groups who are within 'skeptic publishing' circles and outside.
Do you have any recommendations regarding what you use? I haven't
personally found 'Demon Haunted' to be a particularly difficult text
to follow when suggesting it to teenagers. I seem to recall that it
was suggested as a NF text for the English course in my state, but
that was before new changes occurred.

>If you agree check out
> the following website dedicated to teaching critical thinking skills
> to children. http://www.criticalthinking.net.au/index.html
> If you do not agree I'd love to hear why.

I'd be interested in why you think you'd get disagreement? :) Peter
Ellerton has been invited to this group; his last article in the Aust
Skeptics gave an outline of what he is doing but it doesn't use P4C,
as far as I recall...

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages