that theism/atheism is about 'belief', while gnosticism/agnosticism is about 'knowledge' If you combine the two concepts, you get a 4-quadrant grid.
In one quadrant, one can be atheistic + agnostic:
"Not only do I not believe in a god; I know that one does not/can not exist."
In another quadrant, one can be atheistic + gnostic: "I don't believe in a god, but I cannot honestly say that there isn't one. I just haven't seen any proof - yet."
In yet another quadrant, one can be theistic + gnostic: "God is knowable, and I believe in Him."
In the last quadrant is theistic + agnostic: "I don't know anything about God, but I believe in Him just the same."
That last quadrant pretty much sums up 'deism'. Some deists think that God started the whole ball rolling, but then took off, or is still on his 7th day break, or even died in childbirth. Or that he simply doesn't care about / interfere with the day-to-day goings-on of the inhabitants of a small planet in a backwater corner of just another galaxy. He may watch, but he doesn't touch, ever.
From what I can tell, 'deism' still tends to personify "God", give Him some sort of human-like traits.. But he's an absent landlord. A view that when God made the Universe, thee only building material He had was Himself, and so everything in the Universe, including us, is of God, is God, would not be strictly "deist" IMO.
If I had to choose, and wasn't allowed to pick that point where all 4 quadrants intersect, I'd put myself down for deism. Perhaps it's just my cultural indoctrination or wish-fulfilment, or just my own ego talking, but it feels like there is SOMETHING "out there". I just don't know what.
Yet.
õ¿õ¬
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:25:17 AM UTC-5, Karen Wingoof wrote:
Yeah... so... what is Deism?