Can 350.org save the world?

[GLT]

Can 350.org save the world?

Groups gear up to issue an emergency alert that carbon dioxide in the
global atmosphere has already passed a tipping point

By Bill McKibben
May 15, 2009


Writing From Sydney -- All around the world, national governments are
trying to hammer out their global warming policies, preparing for the
United Nations' climate-change conclave in Copenhagen at the end of
the year. And in too many places, the effort seems to be going
nowhere.

Here in Australia, for instance, the government last week decided to
postpone any real action for another year, citing the recession. It
weakened major elements of its so-called emissions trading scheme,
bowing to pressure from the coal industry, which is the country's
biggest exporter, and other major polluters.

Ads by Google

Global Warming Hoax

Find out how scientists, government are fooling the public.

www.douglassreport.com

The New Eco-Fina Bottle™

Pure Water That You Can Trust. 50% less Plastic, 100% Recyclable…

Aquafina-Community-Action.com

Help Solve Global Warming

Discover How You Can Take Action & Demand Change From Your Leaders.

www.WeCanSolveIt.org
In Washington, meanwhile, the Obama administration is valiantly
helping to push a bill through Congress that would finally set a cap
on U.S. carbon emissions. Introduced by Reps. Henry A. Waxman (D-
Beverly Hills) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), it has the support of
most environmental groups and represents the culmination of years of
hard lobbying work. And if the leaks coming out of the committee are
correct, it's watered down with lots of loopholes and compromises.
These concessions are clearly necessary to win passage, but they may
also limit the speed and breadth of the legislation's impact.



The trouble is, physics and chemistry aren't adjusting their schedule
to fit our political and economic convenience. Each week brings new
accounts of crashing ice sheets and spreading droughts. The scientific
journal Nature said in its April 29 cover story that "a growing number
of scientists agree that the CO2 challenge is even greater than had
been previously thought."

As politics gets slower, global warming speeds up. The problem isn't
feckless officials. Obama has a dream team of climate specialists:
Clinton administration EPA veteran Carol Browner as energy czar,
Harvard physicist John Holdren as top science advisor, Nobel Prize-
winning physicist Steven Chu as Energy secretary and Oakland activist
Van Jones as White House green jobs coordinator.

And the problem isn't that environmental groups aren't working hard
enough. I've never seen them work more tirelessly, with lobbying
efforts in capitals around the world.

In fact, the problem is pretty simple: The environmental movement
isn't big enough. It's one of the most selfless of advocacy efforts.
But the movement has been sized to save whales and build national
parks and force carmakers to stick catalytic converters on exhaust
systems. It's nowhere near big enough to take on the fossil fuel
industry, the biggest player in our global economy. It's like sending
the Food and Drug Administration to fight the war in Afghanistan.

Exxon Mobil Corp. made more money last year than any U.S. company in
the history of money. That gives it more clout than all the green
groups combined. Which is why, if the Copenhagen conference is going
to be anything but a disaster, we need to build a stronger movement.
All around the world. Very fast.

That sounds quixotic, but maybe not. I'm here in Australia, organizing
people for a new campaign called 350.org. We take our name from the
most important number in the world, a number that scientists only
identified about 18 months ago. It's the amount of carbon dioxide,
measured in parts per million in the atmosphere, that scientists now
say is the safe maximum for the planet -- a maximum we're well past.
Currently, our atmosphere holds 387 parts per million, which is
precisely why the Arctic is melting, precisely why Australia is
catching on fire.

Our plan is simple. We asked people around the world, through our
website, to hold organized actions on Oct. 24 -- from high in the
Himalayas to underwater on the Great Barrier Reef, from Easter Island
to inner-city America -- in an effort to take that number and drive it
into the human imagination. If we can, it will help the world
understand that this is not some future problem to be set aside until
conditions improve, but a capital-E emergency now overtaking the Earth
that demands a powerful and urgent global response. We can reboot the
conversation, make it about the peril we face but also about the
promise of green jobs and clean economies.

So far it's working. Though 350 parts per million carbon dioxide is an
arcane number, those three digits mean the same thing in Delhi and
China and Melbourne and D.C. Already, more than 700 actions have been
planned in a third of the countries of the world. There will be 350
bicyclists leaving on 350-kilometer trips, and 350 surfers on the
waves in one beach town after another; 350 divers at the Great Barrier
Reef.

Environmental groups from across the spectrum have pledged to help, as
have human rights organizations such as Oxfam, and big networks of
young people in the developing world, and leaders from every faith
community -- hundreds of churches have pledged to ring their bells 350
times on Oct. 24.

The news coming out of world capitals makes it clear that we need more
than lobbying by environmentalists to get the changes the science
demands. We need a movement, a groundswell, to give those lobbyists
the clout they need. But we can make it happen only if we join
together fast.

Bill McKibben is scholar in residence at Middlebury College and
founder of 350.org

CHECK OUT HIS BOOKS