Reuters.com - Expert asks Ecuador court to fine Chevron $27 billion

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Reuter...@reuters.com

unread,
Nov 26, 2008, 10:39:58 PM11/26/08
to Philippine-enviro...@googlegroups.com

qt (PIANO...@GMAIL.COM) has sent you this article.
Personal Message:
Reuters
Expert asks Ecuador court to fine Chevron $27 billion
Wed Nov 26 23:19:57 UTC 2008

By Alonso Soto

QUITO (Reuters) - An environmental expert told a court in Ecuador that oil company Chevron Corp should pay $27 billion in compensation for environmental damage in the country, the company said on Wednesday.

Chevron said in a statement that it rejected geologist Richard Cabrera's revised damage estimate by saying his work "contains fabricated and erroneous evidence." In April, Cabrera recommended to the court that the U.S. oil company should pay up to $16 billion in damages.

The lawsuit, which peasants and Indians in Ecuador brought in the early 1990s, contends that Texaco, which Chevron bought in 2001, polluted the jungle and damaged their health by dumping 18 billion gallons (68 billion liters) of contaminated water from 1972 to 1992.

Chevron questioned Cabrera's independence and charges the plaintiffs of helping him produce his damage assessment.

"Cabrera's work was monitored, supported, and conducted by the plaintiffs. They paid more than $200,000 to fund his 'independent' findings," Chevron said in the statement. "

One of plaintiffs' attorneys Steven Donziger denied helping Cabrera produce the report and said Chevron is trying to undermine the expert's findings to reject any eventual negative court ruling.

"The party that asks for the technical work has to pay for it. Chevron partially payed for Cabrera's work in a previous part of the case," Donziger told Reuters. "We had to fund his (Cabrera) budget because we were the only ones asking for the overall assessment. Chevron is again trying to undermine the court."

Chevron has argued that it was released from any liability because it paid $40 million for an environmental cleanup in the 1990s, and blames state oil company Petroecuador for much of the pollution.

The plaintiff said they expect a final ruling on the case in 2009.

(Reporting by Alonso Soto; Editing By Bernard Orr)

This service is not intended to encourage spam. The details provided by your colleague have been used for the sole purpose of facilitating this email communication and have not been retained by Thomson Reuters. Your personal details have not been added to any database or mailing list.

If you would like to receive news articles delivered to your email address, please subscribe at www.reuters.com/newsmails

© Copyright Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.

Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Thomson Reuters and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages