Daniel Price
unread,Jan 16, 2018, 7:55:40 PM1/16/18Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Christophe Pinte, Jean-François Gonzalez, phantoms...@googlegroups.com, James Wurster
Hi Christophe, J-F,
There is an option to automatically adjust dtmax downwards if it is going to take more than 12 hours of wall time to get an output file.
James just pushed a fix so that this also promotes small dumps to full dumps to avoid the problem you encountered. I’ve also suggested we make this optional (on by default, but able to be turned off in the input file).
Cheers,
Daniel
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 10:07 am, Christophe Pinte <
christop...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I received this email from JF, and I have a quick question regarding this point :
>
> "However, the time step must be getting smaller and smaller because of dust accumulating in a denser and narrower disk, so that phantom decided to divide the time between dumps by 2, then to do it again sometimes later… which means that full dumps no longer coincide with complete orbits!"
>
> is that correct ? I thought the time between dumps was always constant.
>
> Cheers,
> C.
>