Piezo stage/control recommendations

70 views
Skip to first unread message

drolive...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 16, 2017, 7:08:55 PM3/16/17
to pgFocus
Really interested in implementing pgFocus on our custom built TIRF system, based on a Nikon Ti U inverted microscope.

I thought I'd ask the community for advice or recommendations as to the relative merits of different focus control options. We carry out imaging on non-standard samples, often within a faraday cage/box  (~25cm^2 footprint) which would likely limit some of our piezo stage options as we need large, flat, stage footprint and relatively large area for access from under the sample. 


I figure unless there's a piezo stage insert that will fit within, or interfaces with, the recess for the nikon circular stage plate, we have a couple of options -


1) Replace the whole microscope stage with either a) a full custom piezo stage mounted to the microscope or optical table, or b) a manual stage with rectangular stage insert suitable for a more traditional square/rectangular z-stage (we could relatively easily modify the cut-out in the faraday cage to integrate the piezo stage design surface if needed)


2) Purchase a Nikon piezo nosepiece and jump on this.


3) Use a small intermediate objective spacer with piezo displacement - hopefully there will be sufficient downward travel in the nosepiece focus movement to compensate for the increased mounting height of the objective and prevent change in absolute position of back focal plane of objective relative to the TIRF lens.


4) Use a stepper motor to adjust the manual fine-focus control knob of the microscope, either a commercial system or home built equivalent.


5) any other suggestions?


Does anyone have any experience of any of these solutions? Any advice on the pros and cons, especially with regard to operability with pgFocus, speed of response, sensitivity of focus adjustment, cost and practicality, would be really helpful.


Many thanks in advance


Oliver



Karl Bellve

unread,
Mar 17, 2017, 10:50:29 AM3/17/17
to drolive...@gmail.com, pgFocus
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:08 PM <drolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
Really interested in implementing pgFocus on our custom built TIRF system, based on a Nikon Ti U inverted microscope.

I thought I'd ask the community for advice or recommendations as to the relative merits of different focus control options. We carry out imaging on non-standard samples, often within a faraday cage/box  (~25cm^2 footprint) which would likely limit some of our piezo stage options as we need large, flat, stage footprint and relatively large area for access from under the sample. 


I figure unless there's a piezo stage insert that will fit within, or interfaces with, the recess for the nikon circular stage plate, we have a couple of options -


1) Replace the whole microscope stage with either a) a full custom piezo stage mounted to the microscope or optical table, or b) a manual stage with rectangular stage insert suitable for a more traditional square/rectangular z-stage (we could relatively easily modify the cut-out in the faraday cage to integrate the piezo stage design surface if needed)

2) Purchase a Nikon piezo nosepiece and jump on this.


Can you actually buy this as a separate part????? It would be really cool if you could! I wonder what the cost would be. Usually, commercial focus control systems are as much as $20,000US.

Or, do you plan on integrating the complete Perfect Focus, or just use the nose piece from the Nikon with pgFocus? If the latter, that would be very cool to see done... 

But, my guess is the entire Perfect Focus control system is in that nosepiece, optics+electronics...rather than just a dichroic to get the infrared beam in/out.


3) Use a small intermediate objective spacer with piezo displacement - hopefully there will be sufficient downward travel in the nosepiece focus movement to compensate for the increased mounting height of the objective and prevent change in absolute position of back focal plane of objective relative to the TIRF lens.


You should be able to put spacers underneath the nikon stage to compensate for the height added by the piezo and our piezo adds 15mm to the height of the objective. If you can move your stage down >15mm, you should be fine without spacers. If this works, this seems to be the simplest option. 
 


4) Use a stepper motor to adjust the manual fine-focus control knob of the microscope, either a commercial system or home built equivalent.


This would just slow down pgFocus and I haven't written the software to manipulate a Z-stepper motor yet. Software isn't hard to do though. I am not sure slowing down pgFocus due to control loop to adjust a Z-stepper motor is a big issue. The biggest issue on TIRF systems is slow temperature drift, I wouldn't think it would be an issue...

But, this would also increase the error on focus control due to slow z-stepper and gear lash. However, most commercial systems rely on the a stepper drive to control focus and it works well enough for them. Depends whether you need ±3nm control with 30Hz control loop or you don't. Hmm..you did write TIRF..so my guess you do need very fine focus control. We use pgFocus on our TIRF microscopes.

If you go the route Z-stepper drive, you wouldn't need a complete pgFocus. You would just need to the pgFocus sensor board and an arduino. The electronics becomes simple...

I personally hope you go this route for selfish reasons. This would force me to adapt the software for Z-stepper control, and make pgFocus available for a wider audience...


5) any other suggestions?


Does anyone have any experience of any of these solutions? Any advice on the pros and cons, especially with regard to operability with pgFocus, speed of response, sensitivity of focus adjustment, cost and practicality, would be really helpful.


I just posted a few emails about an optical layout board for pgFocus and a pgFocus-shield. Both beta. Just to let people know they are another possibility.

Cheers Karl

drolive...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 17, 2017, 12:22:47 PM3/17/17
to pgFocus, drolive...@gmail.com
Thanks very much for the info and the help...some responses/further detail below...


On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 2:50:29 PM UTC, Karl Bellve wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:08 PM <drolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
Really interested in implementing pgFocus on our custom built TIRF system, based on a Nikon Ti U inverted microscope.

I thought I'd ask the community for advice or recommendations as to the relative merits of different focus control options. We carry out imaging on non-standard samples, often within a faraday cage/box  (~25cm^2 footprint) which would likely limit some of our piezo stage options as we need large, flat, stage footprint and relatively large area for access from under the sample. 


I figure unless there's a piezo stage insert that will fit within, or interfaces with, the recess for the nikon circular stage plate, we have a couple of options -


1) Replace the whole microscope stage with either a) a full custom piezo stage mounted to the microscope or optical table, or b) a manual stage with rectangular stage insert suitable for a more traditional square/rectangular z-stage (we could relatively easily modify the cut-out in the faraday cage to integrate the piezo stage design surface if needed)

2) Purchase a Nikon piezo nosepiece and jump on this.


Can you actually buy this as a separate part????? It would be really cool if you could! I wonder what the cost would be. Usually, commercial focus control systems are as much as $20,000US.

Or, do you plan on integrating the complete Perfect Focus, or just use the nose piece from the Nikon with pgFocus? If the latter, that would be very cool to see done... 

-> I was thinking about just the piezo nose piece. I have bought incomplete parts from Nikon in the past. I don't know if they would split the Perfect Focus system, but I've found them generally accommodating to specific requests if you're buying a microscope body.

But, my guess is the entire Perfect Focus control system is in that nosepiece, optics+electronics...rather than just a dichroic to get the infrared beam in/out.

-> I had assumed that was all off board and this was simply a motorised version of the standard nose piece - I must admit I'm not sure though. 


3) Use a small intermediate objective spacer with piezo displacement - hopefully there will be sufficient downward travel in the nosepiece focus movement to compensate for the increased mounting height of the objective and prevent change in absolute position of back focal plane of objective relative to the TIRF lens.


You should be able to put spacers underneath the nikon stage to compensate for the height added by the piezo and our piezo adds 15mm to the height of the objective. If you can move your stage down >15mm, you should be fine without spacers. If this works, this seems to be the simplest option. 

-> This is a good suggestion, thanks. Only potential downside is that if the spacer is required on the stage, the back focal plane of the objective relative to the TIRF lens changes and so it will need a bit of re-alignment and lens re-positioning. This isn't a big deal, unless the ideal location ends up being in some difficult to access position! This can be dealt with a series of relay lenses for our free space TIRF, but our fibre launch we're a bit more constrained, so I'd rather keep the bfp in the same place if possible - or ensure we have enough lens travel to accomodate. Out of interest, which piezo objective mount do you use?
 


4) Use a stepper motor to adjust the manual fine-focus control knob of the microscope, either a commercial system or home built equivalent.


This would just slow down pgFocus and I haven't written the software to manipulate a Z-stepper motor yet. Software isn't hard to do though. I am not sure slowing down pgFocus due to control loop to adjust a Z-stepper motor is a big issue. The biggest issue on TIRF systems is slow temperature drift, I wouldn't think it would be an issue...

But, this would also increase the error on focus control due to slow z-stepper and gear lash. However, most commercial systems rely on the a stepper drive to control focus and it works well enough for them. Depends whether you need ±3nm control with 30Hz control loop or you don't. Hmm..you did write TIRF..so my guess you do need very fine focus control. We use pgFocus on our TIRF microscopes.

-> Yes, most ideally fast and fine control, so I guess this is less ideal for us

Karl Bellve

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 1:35:21 PM3/20/17
to pgFocus
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <drolive...@gmail.com>

  •  Out of interest, which piezo objective mount do you use?
I think this is the only question. If I missed one, let me know.

We just use a PI P-721.LLQ coupled to a PI E-662 controller.



Cheers Karl


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pgFocus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pgfocus+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pgf...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pgfocus/3a3d6431-532b-40f1-a87e-8e86dc25e32b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

drolive...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 10, 2017, 8:40:25 AM4/10/17
to pgFocus
Thank you very much
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages