Standards of Permaculture
A comprehensive overview of the movement's foundational ethics, curriculum standards, and accreditation frameworks, drawn from source material
This document gathers what "standards" have concretely meant in permaculture since its founding: the ethical foundation all design work is meant to rest on,
the curriculum standard that defines a genuine Permaculture Design Course, and the accreditation frameworks built to verify advanced practice.
It focuses on documented standards as they were established and taught — not on disputes over them — with attribution and links to primary sources throughout.
1. The Ethical Foundation
Every standard built on top of permaculture rests on the same base: three ethics, first articulated by Mollison and Holmgren and carried forward by every teaching lineage since.
Earth Care, People Care, Fair Share — described as the foundation for permaculture design, found in most traditional societies in some form.
Widely cited formulation; see Holmgren's Essence of Permaculture and
permacultureprinciples.com.
Holmgren's later work sometimes rendered the third ethic as "Future Care" or "Return of Surplus" — reinvesting surplus back into supporting the first two ethics —
but the three-part structure itself has remained constant across every major teaching lineage since the 1970s.
2. The Twelve Design Principles
Building on the three ethics, Holmgren articulated twelve design principles in Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability (2002), now the most widely taught principle set in the movement:
Observe and interact
Catch and store energy
Obtain a yield
Apply self-regulation and accept feedback
Use and value renewable resources and services
Produce no waste
Design from patterns to details
Integrate rather than segregate
Use small and slow solutions
Use and value diversity
Use edges and value the marginal
Creatively use and respond to change
Source: David Holmgren, Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability (Melliodora, 2002);
permacultureprinciples.com.
3. The 72-Hour PDC Curriculum Standard
The single most consistent, widely-enforced standard in the entire movement is the Permaculture Design Certificate (PDC) curriculum, standardized at a minimum of 72 contact hours.
The PDC curriculum traces directly to Bill Mollison's original teaching and to Permaculture: A Designer's Manual, and remains the baseline every internationally-recognized PDC provider still teaches to.
Confirmed independently across many current teaching organizations — Midwest Permaculture, the Northern School of Permaculture, Santa Cruz Permaculture, and others —
all of whom cite the same 72-hour figure as the non-negotiable floor.
The standard carries real weight beyond course length: completion of an official 72-hour PDC is what conventionally authorizes a graduate to use the word "Permaculture"
in connection with their own commercial teaching or design work — an honor-system convention going back to the movement's earliest days, when Mollison himself issued
certificates of completion to his own students as a mark of having been properly exposed to the full curriculum.
Some schools extend beyond the 72-hour floor (adding field practicum hours, regional modules, or hands-on project time), but none teach less and still call the result a
PDC in the traditionally recognized sense — courses that shorten the curriculum are generally understood within the standards-conscious wing of the movement as a
different, lesser credential, whatever they may call themselves.
4. Scott Pittman and the Question of Standards
Scott Pittman — co-founder with Bill Mollison, Vint Lawrence, and Francis Huxley of the Permaculture Institute, Inc. in 1997 — was among the most consistent voices
insisting that the 72-hour threshold be treated as a hard floor, not a marketing suggestion.
"Some people are teaching PDCs that have less than 72 contact hours... it dilutes the credibility of courses that most other people are teaching."
Scott Pittman, interviewed on the Permaculture Salad podcast, Episode 9: "Permaculture History and Standards."
Over more than two decades running the Permaculture Institute out of Santa Fe, Pittman and his wife Arina built out a full teaching and accreditation structure on top of
the 72-hour PDC floor: the Institute issued 7,597 PDC certificates and 60 advanced-practitioner Diplomas of Permaculture Design over its history —
real, countable outcomes of a standards-first approach to teaching.
In his later writing (2018–2019), Pittman pushed the standards conversation further still, arguing for a curriculum that put ethics and principles more explicitly at the center of
PDC teaching, deliberately working against what he saw as the encroachment of materialism into how the subject was being presented — a sign that, for Pittman, "standards"
was an actively maintained, evolving commitment rather than a document filed away and left untouched.
The Permaculture Institute, Inc. has announced it will close at the end of 2026, following Pittman's death and a transition period under Jason Gerhardt and Natalia Vega Araya.
5. Advanced Accreditation: The Diploma Standard
Beyond the entry-level PDC, the movement's most fully developed accreditation framework is the UK Permaculture Association's Diploma in Applied Permaculture Design —
a structured, peer-assessed standard for verifying advanced practice, not just course attendance.
Entry requirement
A completed PDC is required before beginning the Diploma pathway; the Certificate in Applied Permaculture Design (CAPD) serves as a two-design foundation step
into the full ten-design Diploma.
Portfolio requirement
Diploma apprentices complete a self-directed portfolio of ten real designs spanning both land-based and non-land-based applications (education, community development,
business planning, and similar), each guided by a personal tutor.
Assessment criteria
Work is judged against essential and complementary criteria, developed to verify design competence is genuinely embodied, not just documented:
Theory in Action — evidence the apprentice is living permaculture's ethics, not just designing on paper
Design Practice — competent choice and application of design processes to real situations
Dissemination — how the work is shared back with the wider permaculture body (writing, teaching, mentoring)
Community Building, Symmetry, and Evaluation & Costings — complementary criteria on the design's wider relational and practical soundness
Accreditation event
Accreditation culminates in a 45-minute presentation of the apprentice's portfolio to a peer panel of Diploma holders and PDC holders,
who inspect the full portfolio directly against the criteria above before granting accreditation — a real, in-person standard of proof, not a self-certification.
Source: Permaculture Association (UK), Diploma in Applied Permaculture Design program pages and Accreditation for the Diploma guidance.
6. Summary: What "Standards" Concretely Means
A shared ethical foundation — Earth Care, People Care, Fair Share — underlying all design work, regardless of teaching lineage
Twelve design principles (Holmgren) providing a common working vocabulary across the movement
A 72-hour minimum curriculum for any course claiming to be a genuine PDC, traced directly to Mollison's own teaching
An honor-system convention that only PDC graduates commercially use the word "Permaculture" for their own teaching or design work
Structured advanced accreditation (the Diploma) requiring a real portfolio, tutoring, and peer-panel assessment — not self-declaration
Active, ongoing advocacy for these standards by figures like Scott Pittman, who treated the 72-hour floor and curriculum integrity as worth actively defending, not just historically established
Compiled from a web survey conducted August 16, 2026, from currently available primary and institutional sources. A natural next step for this reference is cross-referencing it
against firsthand discussion of these standards in the permaculture list archive (
lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture) — particularly threads involving Scott Pittman or PDC/Diploma standards directly.
--