Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
partial photo/image tests without Img extension?
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Christopher Chavez
Aug 19, 2018, 3:30:03 AM8/19/18
to tc...@perl.org
I notice that both Tcl::Tk and Tcl::pTk have some tests that currently require the Img extension to handle image formats not included in Tcl/Tk. Would it be desirable to still test the formats that are available (gif; png on Tk 8.6), or is the test more about exercising the capabilities in Img? Is it even possible to plan a certain number of tests and then skip a subset of them?
This is low/“wishlist” priority; I ask only because at the moment MacPorts doesn’t have the Img extension.
This is low/“wishlist” priority; I ask only because at the moment MacPorts doesn’t have the Img extension.
Konovalov, Vadim
Aug 19, 2018, 5:30:02 AM8/19/18
to Christopher Chavez, tc...@perl.org
> I
> notice that both Tcl::Tk and Tcl::pTk have some tests that currently require
> the Img extension to handle image formats not included in Tcl/Tk. Would it be
> desirable to still test the formats that are available (gif; png on Tk 8.6), or
> is the test more about exercising the capabilities in Img? Is it even possible
> to plan a certain number of tests and then skip a subset of them?
I didn't knew that png and gif are even good w/o Img extension
> notice that both Tcl::Tk and Tcl::pTk have some tests that currently require
> the Img extension to handle image formats not included in Tcl/Tk. Would it be
> desirable to still test the formats that are available (gif; png on Tk 8.6), or
> is the test more about exercising the capabilities in Img? Is it even possible
> to plan a certain number of tests and then skip a subset of them?
Yes, your proposal is highly desireable :)
0 new messages