Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[perl #27246] [PATCH] Correct ommision inconfig/gen/makefiles /befun ge.in

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Jerry Gay

unread,
Mar 1, 2004, 11:48:08 AM3/1/04
to perl6-i...@perl.org
if this is accepted, please close [perl #27083], as it addresses this bug,
but i haven't yet seen it posted to the list.

--jerry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nigels...@btconnect.com
> [mailto:bugs-...@netlabs.develooper.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:20 AM
> To: perl6-i...@perl.org
> Subject: [perl #27246] [PATCH] Correct ommision
> inconfig/gen/makefiles/befun ge.in
>
>
> # New Ticket Created by nigels...@btconnect.com
> # Please include the string: [perl #27246]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # <URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27246 >
>
>
> There was no
> PERL = ${perl}
> definition in this file (which does exist in jako.in and
> others), hence when the
> "clean" target was called, the RM_F expansion omitted the
> perl resulting in
>
> nmake befunge clean
>
> and all the dependancies
>
> nmake languages-clean
> nmake clean
> nmake realclean
>
> failing with "invalid command or filename".
>
> Lokking around, I think that BF.in is similarly wrong, but I
> am not currently
> building that, and could be mistaken .
>
>
>

**************************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you
for your compliance.

Stephane Peiry

unread,
Mar 1, 2004, 4:39:37 PM3/1/04
to Gay, Jerry, perl6-i...@perl.org

Done thanks,
Stéphane
0 new messages