Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More IMCC bugs
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Dan Sugalski
Dec 10, 2003, 5:48:50 PM12/10/03
to perl6-i...@perl.org
A .sub that's prototyped (Dunno about the non-prototyped case) that
doesn't have a .pcc_begin_return/.pcc_end_return pair in it (empty is
fine) will cause parrot to crash'n'burn. Subs without a designated
return should be assumed to return nothing, the same as if an empty
begin/end pair was specified.
--
Dan
doesn't have a .pcc_begin_return/.pcc_end_return pair in it (empty is
fine) will cause parrot to crash'n'burn. Subs without a designated
return should be assumed to return nothing, the same as if an empty
begin/end pair was specified.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
d...@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Leopold Toetsch
Feb 22, 2004, 9:38:45 AM2/22/04
to Dan Sugalski, perl6-i...@perl.org
Dan Sugalski <d...@sidhe.org> wrote:
> A .sub that's prototyped (Dunno about the non-prototyped case) that
> doesn't have a .pcc_begin_return/.pcc_end_return pair in it (empty is
> fine) will cause parrot to crash'n'burn. Subs without a designated
> return should be assumed to return nothing, the same as if an empty
> begin/end pair was specified.
> A .sub that's prototyped (Dunno about the non-prototyped case) that
> doesn't have a .pcc_begin_return/.pcc_end_return pair in it (empty is
> fine) will cause parrot to crash'n'burn. Subs without a designated
> return should be assumed to return nothing, the same as if an empty
> begin/end pair was specified.
Done.
leo
0 new messages