[PS] open patches

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Leopold Toetsch

unread,
Oct 22, 2003, 6:48:18 AM10/22/03
to P6I
http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches/ shows a list of open patches
ranging from #801 up to recent ones. Some of them are marked pending or
applied but not closed.
I'd be glad if someone could go through the list and update it so that
the actual state is reflected at that site.

I know, some of these patches got applied by myself, and I just forgot
then. So lets please for the future try to not forget to mark patches
applied/whatever and close after some time[1].

Thanks,
leo

[1] IIRC must close be done after sending the "applied notice" mail or
that would reopen it.

PS: I'd rather not do it myself lacking an 24/7 internet connection - I
have to pay for my ISDN line per minute.

PPS: PS stands for "post scriptum" or "pumpking speaking" :)

PPPS: Dunno if Juergen already has sufficient rights to update the patch
status (it was some separate step for my acccount) - If not please
update these bits in the setup. Thanks again.

Robert

unread,
Oct 22, 2003, 11:21:26 AM10/22/03
to Leopold Toetsch, P6I
If anyone goes through that list and provides me with a list of needed
updates (in a standardized format), I can do some bulk updates
relatively easily.

-R

Michael Scott

unread,
Oct 29, 2003, 4:20:24 AM10/29/03
to Robert, perl6-i...@perl.org
Some of patches on that list that are mine.

#24030 Obsolete
#24038 Obsolete
#24043 Applied
#24063 Applied
#24177 Rejected
#24188 Applied

I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied.

Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself?

Mike

Robert Spier

unread,
Oct 30, 2003, 1:20:53 AM10/30/03
to perl6-i...@perl.org
> Some of patches on that list that are mine.
> #24030 Obsolete
> #24038 Obsolete
> #24043 Applied
> #24063 Applied
> #24177 Rejected
> #24188 Applied
> I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied.
> Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself?

You have to log in with an account that uses the same email address,
and then you should be able to. (If you have an account that uses a
different email address, then I need to match things up.)

Michael Scott

unread,
Oct 30, 2003, 4:05:40 AM10/30/03
to Robert Spier, perl6-i...@perl.org

My account (mikescott) at http://auth.perl.org/auth/account shows the
correct email. The RT page assures me that I'm signed in as mikescott.
I go to the Modify ticket #24030 and set Status to resolved, click Save
Changes and get Status: Permission Denied.

Aldo Calpini

unread,
Oct 30, 2003, 5:54:34 AM10/30/03
to Leopold Toetsch, P6I

these are the patches of mine which still show as Pending:

(17405) [PATCH] correct make pdb on Win32
(24149) [PATCH] small Makefile patch (rm *.s in realclean instead of clean)
(24205) [PATCH] removing -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args for non x86 arch

the last one was applied by Dan, but the Status wasn't updated on RT.
I can't do it myself (permission denied).


cheers,
Aldo

__END__
$_=q,just perl,,s, , another ,,s,$, hacker,,print;

Robert Spier

unread,
Oct 30, 2003, 11:16:10 PM10/30/03
to Michael Scott, perl6-i...@perl.org
> My account (mikescott) at http://auth.perl.org/auth/account shows the
> correct email. The RT page assures me that I'm signed in as mikescott.
> I go to the Modify ticket #24030 and set Status to resolved, click Save
> Changes and get Status: Permission Denied.

RT had a different idea of what your email address was. (There is an
issue with propagation.) I've reeducated it.

Try now.

-R

Robert Spier

unread,
Oct 30, 2003, 11:24:52 PM10/30/03
to Aldo Calpini, Leopold Toetsch, P6I
> (24205) [PATCH] removing -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args for non x86 arch
>
> the last one was applied by Dan, but the Status wasn't updated on RT.
> I can't do it myself (permission denied).

I've updated the ticket.

RT thinks your email address is @perl.it, but the ticket was created
from the @alos.it address.

Thanks-

-R

Michael Scott

unread,
Oct 31, 2003, 5:07:08 AM10/31/03
to Robert Spier, perl6-i...@perl.org
Reeducation succeeded.

I resolved #24030 and #24038 by changing the Status field and hitting
Save Changes, then I noticed there was a Resolve option on the top
righthand side which asks for details for a notification email. I'm
wondering which is the approved way?

I ask because I'll add a details to the ParrotSubmissions page on the
wiki when I'm done.

http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/ParrotSubmissions

BTW I submitted a pod version of this page as #24103 with a suggestion
for a [NEW] prefix convention for new files but it got warnocked.

Mike

Robert Spier

unread,
Oct 31, 2003, 4:46:28 PM10/31/03
to perl6-i...@perl.org
> I resolved #24030 and #24038 by changing the Status field and hitting
> Save Changes, then I noticed there was a Resolve option on the top
> righthand side which asks for details for a notification email. I'm
> wondering which is the approved way?

Either is fine. By default the "Resolve" page will only add a comment
unless you change it to "Correspondence". But if you don't enter any
text in the big box, none will be recorded.

-R

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages