PGE is currently passing all tests, but failing to run a "large" pugs
grammar (one for p6 regexps). So I transliterated part of the grammar
into a (failing) test. Attached. The test can grow into a full regexp
description, and serves as a way of flagging any apparent pge problems
encountered along the way.
Thanks for all your work,
Wow, this is excellent, thanks!
Is this test based on the rules grammar that is currently in
pugs/trunk/modules/Grammars/rx_grammar.pl? (It appears so.)
If yes, can I propose that we go ahead and clean up that grammar
definition a bit, and then build the test off of that? (My use
of "we" here explicitly includes "me".) Some of the rules listed
in rx_grammar.pl are not as I think they should be, so it might be
productive to hammer out a better working definition for the
syntax and then build the test.
(Plus, we may be able to use this as a good reason to get the PGE
test suite to directly read and test rx_grammar.pl, so that we don't
have to manually maintain both.)
So, if you're in agreement, shall I post my changes to rx_grammar.pl
for discussion (to perl6-compiler)? Or should we take a different