It would be quite interesting to have Parrot figures too and see
benchmark timings decrease steadily ;-)
I've someone wants to take over that part:
- configure => perl Configure.pl --optimize
- make && make install ought to be ok to /usr/local ...
So we'd just need the benchmark code translated to PIR. I've here
harmonic.pir and ack.pir (the latter sucks badly)
leo
How is this different from timeparrot? <http://xrl.us/f9oy>
> So we'd just need the benchmark code translated to PIR. I've here
> harmonic.pir and ack.pir (the latter sucks badly)
Adding .pasm, .imc, and .pir scripts to examples/benchmarks/ will
cause them to be benchmarked and graphed as part of timeparrot every
day.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
> How is this different from timeparrot? <http://xrl.us/f9oy>
The difference is comparison to ~60 different compiled and interpreted
languages (click "Sandbox").
>> So we'd just need the benchmark code translated to PIR. I've here
>> harmonic.pir and ack.pir (the latter sucks badly)
> Adding .pasm, .imc, and .pir scripts to examples/benchmarks/ will
> cause them to be benchmarked and graphed as part of timeparrot every
> day.
Yes I know. We should do that additionally to get figures vs time to see
how Parrot evolves.
leo
Okay. I wasn't sure that you meant to actually add it to the Shootout.
Looking at the site again, I found the FAQ and understand what you are
saying.