This was mentioned by Leo in Ticket 34934 and 30230:
> Oh well, while at it, the *BooleanArray should just use one bit per item
> not an INTVAL.
I'll tackle that. First I'll propable take a look at Bit::Vector in Perl5,
as there are propably a lot of interesting methods on a boolean array.
There are even CPUs with processor instructions for counting set bits.
Does that call for some inline assembler in PMC C-code?
CU, Bernhard
--
/* Bernhard.S...@biomax.de */
DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Superg�nstig und stressfrei einsteigen!
AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>
> This was mentioned by Leo in Ticket 34934 and 30230:
>
>
>>Oh well, while at it, the *BooleanArray should just use one bit per item
>>not an INTVAL.
>
>
> I'll tackle that. First I'll propable take a look at Bit::Vector in Perl5,
> as there are propably a lot of interesting methods on a boolean array.
Great, thanks.
> There are even CPUs with processor instructions for counting set bits.
> Does that call for some inline assembler in PMC C-code?
Not yet IMHO. But I can imagine that PGE might need all available speed
hacks. Let's see.
> CU, Bernhard
leo