Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ampheta and r2: Working

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Morbus Iff

unread,
Sep 8, 2002, 10:46:06 AM9/8/02
to Chris Nandor, macperl...@perl.org, a...@afco.demon.co.uk, ro...@sj.com

I fear I made some late night mistake on my first round of testing:

>Unfortunately, I was able to duplicate this using the latest CVS.
>AmphetaDesk started up fine, ran fine, but the minute I tried to Apple-Q,
>nastiness would start happening. The first time, AmphetaDesk closed fine.
>Second time, hard reboot required (no dialog box about closing the
>script). Tried again, hard reboot after first attempt to Quit.

After testing again this morning, I was able to run Ampheta, under r2,
without the SIGINT commented, about a dozen times with no crashes, or other
noticeable negatives. I'm now wondering if I was stupidly running r1 over
again in my earlier tests. So, until otherwise, I'm confirming this fixed:

>* AmphetaDesk users: please try to use this, and
> try to duplicate the previous crashing bug.

Sorry 'bout that.

--
Morbus Iff ( notice how he deftly sidesteps the panty issue. )
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
Tech: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779 - articles and weblog
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus

Chris Nandor

unread,
Sep 8, 2002, 10:47:33 AM9/8/02
to Morbus Iff, macperl...@perl.org, a...@afco.demon.co.uk, ro...@sj.com
At 10:46 -0400 2002.09.08, Morbus Iff wrote:
>I fear I made some late night mistake on my first round of testing:
>
> >Unfortunately, I was able to duplicate this using the latest CVS.
> >AmphetaDesk started up fine, ran fine, but the minute I tried to Apple-Q,
> >nastiness would start happening. The first time, AmphetaDesk closed fine.
> >Second time, hard reboot required (no dialog box about closing the
> >script). Tried again, hard reboot after first attempt to Quit.
>
>After testing again this morning, I was able to run Ampheta, under r2,
>without the SIGINT commented, about a dozen times with no crashes, or other
>noticeable negatives. I'm now wondering if I was stupidly running r1 over
>again in my earlier tests. So, until otherwise, I'm confirming this fixed:
>
>>* AmphetaDesk users: please try to use this, and
>> try to duplicate the previous crashing bug.
>
>Sorry 'bout that.

No worries; I didn't spend any significant amount of time looking into it,
so no harm done. :) But everyone else who wishes, please do test it as
well.

Thanks, Morbus, that's good news.

--
Chris Nandor pu...@pobox.com http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network pu...@osdn.com http://osdn.com/

0 new messages