Arouter is in charge of connecting incoming requests to the services that can handle them.In the process, routers may use pieces of middleware to update the request,or act before forwarding the request to the service.
Rules are a set of matchers configured with values, that determine if a particular request matches specific criteria.If the rule is verified, the router becomes active, calls middlewares, and then forwards the request to the service.
To avoid path overlap, routes are sorted, by default, in descending order using rules length.The priority is directly equal to the length of the rule, and so the longest length has the highest priority.
In Traefik v3 a new rule syntax has been introduced (migration guide).ruleSyntax option allows to configure the rule syntax to be used for parsing the rule on a per-router basis.This allows to have heterogeneous router configurations and ease migration.
The default value of the ruleSyntax option is inherited from the defaultRuleSyntax option in the static configuration.By default, the defaultRuleSyntax static option is v3, meaning that the default rule syntax is also v3.
When a TLS section is specified, it instructs Traefik that the current router is dedicated to HTTPS requests only(and that the router should ignore HTTP (non TLS) requests).Traefik will terminate the SSL connections (meaning that it will send decrypted data to the services).
Even though one might get the impression that a TLS options reference is mapped to a router, or a router rule,one should realize that it is actually mapped only to the host name found in the Host part of the rule.Of course, there could also be several Host parts in a rule, in which case the TLS options reference would be mapped to as many host names.
Another thing to keep in mind is:the TLS option is picked from the mapping mentioned above and based on the server name provided during the TLS handshake,and it all happens before routing actually occurs.
Since a TLS options reference is mapped to a host name,if a configuration introduces a situation where the same host name (from a Host rule) gets matched with two TLS options references,a conflict occurs, such as in the example below:
Most likely the root domain should receive a certificate too, so it needs to be specified as SAN and 2 DNS-01 challenges are executed.In this case the generated DNS TXT record for both domains is the same.Even though this behavior is DNS RFC compliant,it can lead to problems as all DNS providers keep DNS records cached for a given time (TTL) and this TTL can be greater than the challenge timeout making the DNS-01 challenge fail.
The Traefik ACME client library lego supports some but not all DNS providers to work around this issue.The supported provider table indicates if they allow generating certificates for a wildcard domain and its root domain.
If both HTTP routers and TCP routers listen to the same EntryPoint, the TCP routers will apply before the HTTP routers.If no matching route is found for the TCP routers, then the HTTP routers will take over.
For protocols where the server is expected to send first, such as SMTP, if no specific setup is in place,we could end up in a situation where both sides are waiting for data and the connection appears to have hanged.
The only way that Traefik can deal with such a case, is to make sure that on the concerned entry point,there is no TLS router whatsoever (neither TCP nor HTTP),and there is at least one non-TLS TCP router that leads to the server in question.
Rules are a set of matchers configured with values, that determine if a particular connection matches specific criteria.If the rule is verified, the router becomes active, calls middlewares, and then forwards the request to the service.
It is important to note that the Server Name Indication is an extension of the TLS protocol.Hence, only TLS routers will be able to specify a domain name with that rule.However, there is one special use case for HostSNI with non-TLS routers:when one wants a non-TLS router that matches all (non-TLS) requests,one should use the specific HostSNI(`*`) syntax.
It would be a security issue to let a user-defined router catch the response toan ACME TLS challenge previously initiated by Traefik.For this reason, the ALPN matcher is not allowed to match the ACME-TLS/1protocol, and Traefik returns an error if this is attempted.
Which means that requests from 192.168.0.12 would go to Router-2 even though Router-1 is intended to specifically handle them.To achieve this intention, a priority (higher than 26) should be set on Router-1.
To do so, Traefik reads the first bytes sent by a Postgres client,identifies if they correspond to the message of a STARTTLS negotiation,and, if so, acknowledges and signals the client that it can start the TLS handshake.
Please note/remember that there are subtleties inherent to STARTTLS in whether the connection ends up being a TLS one or not.These subtleties depend on the sslmode value in the client configuration (and on the server authentication rules).Therefore, it is recommended to use the require value for the sslmode.
As mentioned above, the sslmode configuration parameter does have an impact on whether a STARTTLS session will succeed.In particular in the context of TCP TLS PassThrough, some of the values (such as allow) do not even make sense.Which is why, once more it is recommended to use the require value.
As seen above, a TLS router will terminate the TLS connection by default.However, the passthrough option can be specified to set whether the requests should be forwarded "as is", keeping all data encrypted.
Similarly to TCP, as UDP is the transport layer, there is no concept of a request,so there is no notion of an URL path prefix to match an incoming UDP packet with.Furthermore, as there is no good TLS support at the moment for multiple hosts,there is no Host SNI notion to match against either.Therefore, there is no criterion that could be used as a rule to match incoming packets in order to route them.So UDP "routers" at this time are pretty much only load-balancers in one form or another.
Even though UDP is connectionless (and because of that),the implementation of an UDP router in Traefik relies on what we (and a couple of other implementations) call a session.It basically means that some state is kept about an ongoing communication between a client and a backend,notably so that the proxy knows where to forward a response packet from a backend.As expected, a timeout is associated to each of these sessions,so that they get cleaned out if they go through a period of inactivity longer than a given duration.Timeout can be configured using the entryPoints.name.udp.timeout option as described under EntryPoints.
A router is connected to two or more data lines from different IP networks. When a data packet comes in on a line, the router reads the network address information in the packet header to determine the ultimate destination. Then, using information in its routing table or routing policy, it directs the packet to the next network on its journey. Data packets are forwarded from one router to another through an internetwork until it reaches its destination node.[5]
The most familiar type of IP routers are home and small office routers that forward IP packets between the home computers and the Internet. More sophisticated routers, such as enterprise routers, connect large business or ISP networks to powerful core routers that forward data at high speed along the optical fiber lines of the Internet backbone.
Routers can be built from standard computer parts but are mostly specialized purpose-built computers. Early routers used software-based forwarding, running on a CPU. More sophisticated devices use application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) to increase performance or add advanced filtering and firewall functionality.
When multiple routers are used in interconnected networks, the routers can exchange information about destination addresses using a routing protocol. Each router builds up a routing table, a list of routes, between two computer systems on the interconnected networks.[6][7]
A router may have interfaces for multiple types of physical layer connections, such as copper cables, fiber optic, or wireless transmission. It can also support multiple network layer transmission standards. Each network interface is used to enable data packets to be forwarded from one transmission system to another. Routers may also be used to connect two or more logical groups of computer devices known as subnets, each with a unique network prefix.
Routers may provide connectivity within enterprises, between enterprises and the Internet, or between internet service providers' (ISPs') networks, they are also responsible for directing data between different networks.[9] The largest routers (such as the Cisco CRS-1 or Juniper PTX) interconnect the various ISPs, or may be used in large enterprise networks.[10] Smaller routers usually provide connectivity for typical home and office networks.
All sizes of routers may be found inside enterprises.[11] The most powerful routers are usually found in ISPs, academic and research facilities. Large businesses may also need more powerful routers to cope with ever-increasing demands of intranet data traffic. A hierarchical internetworking model for interconnecting routers in large networks is in common use.[12] Some routers can connect to Data service units for T1 connections[13][14][15] via serial ports.[16][17]
3a8082e126