Azizan Nafi Diliwat Anwar Tiga Kali Dalam Mahkamah
417 views
Skip to first unread message
xBlog ☪ Magificent Sociopolitical Blogs
Sep 6, 2012, 7:07:21 PM9/6/12
to people-ar...@googlegroups.com
Azizan Nafi Diliwat Anwar Tiga Kali Dalam Mahkamah
|
- Azizan Nafi Diliwat Anwar Tiga Kali Dalam Mahkamah
- Pak Samad: Polis tanya soalan yang depa sudah tahu jawapannya...
- Universal Declaration of Peace & Harmony
- In Sabah. some very clumsy politicians shoot themselves in the foot
- Despite CEDAW, women workers in the private sector are not protected from discrimination
- Anwar, how now?
- Berikut adalah SOP polis untuk gari pesalah...
- <br>
- Workers’ and trade union rights in BN-ruled Malaysia (Part 2)
- Batu Kawan land: “Cheap sale”
- Surat dari Sukma Darmawan kepada Anwar Ibrahim (KENANGAN)
- Old Penang: Madras Lane
- Khalid Dakwa Pejabat Setiausaha Sulit DYMM Tuanku Berbohong?
- LGBT di Melaka Bila UMNO Nak Benteras?
- Kerajaan PAS Kelantan Tawar Rasuah Kepada Ketua UMNO
- Kejadian Serangan Oleh Perkasa Di Masjid (Termasuk Kejadian Didalam Masjid)
- (Video) Fatwa Sheikh Yusof Al Qaradawi Berhubung Fitnah Terhadap Anwar Ibrahim
- Rakaman Ceramah Perdana, Jelajah MerdekaRakyat, Alor Setar 02/09/2012
- 15,000 turned up in Raub and today Federal Court case
- Wujudkah Mangsa Liwat Anwar Ibrahim Lagi?
|
Azizan Nafi Diliwat Anwar Tiga Kali Dalam Mahkamah Posted: 06 Sep 2012 11:30 AM PDT
NOTA: Di bawah saya bawa laporan dari Laman Marhean berkaitan dengan bagaimana Azizan menafikan dengan terang bahawa dia diliwat Anwar Ibrahim.
Penafian ini datang dari mulut Azizan sendiri di dalam mahkamah. Azizan bukan cakap benda ni dalam panggung wayang ataupun dalam kedai kopi.
Banding kenyataan ini dengan kenyataan Azizan dalam youtube sewaktu beliau melawat Ustaz Taib Azamuddin yang dipopularkan oleh blogger2 UMNO sekarang ini:
Ertinya Azizan sanggup pergi jumpa Ustaz Taib Azamuddin semata-mata untuk berlakon kononnya dia diliwat.
Dan cyberuk2 UMNO dibayar untuk terus menerus mengungkap perkataan Anwar meliwat Azizan. Padahal Azizan telahpun mengaku dalam mahkamah bahwa dia tidak diliwat Anwar Ibrahim.
 
|
|||||
|
Pak Samad: Polis tanya soalan yang depa sudah tahu jawapannya... Posted: 06 Sep 2012 10:11 AM PDT  Pihak polis langsung tidak menyoal Sasterawan Negara, Datuk A. Samad Said berhubung puisi "Janji Demokrasi" yang dibacanya ketika perhimpunan di Dataran Merdeka, Khamis lalu.Sebaliknya soalan yang ditanya berkisar tentang perhimpunan Janji Demokrasi anjuran Gabungan Janji. Justeru beliau memilih untuk tidak menjawab soalan-soalan yang ditanya kecuali mengenai maklumat dirinya sahaja. "Saya memilih untuk tidak menjawab semua soalan itu kecuali infomasi diri saya sahaja. "Seingat saya, tiada langsung soalan mengenai puisi yang ditanya," kata beliau selepas memberikan keterangan di Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Dang Wangi petang ini. Beliau disiasat di bawah seksyen 9 Akta Perhimpunan Aman 2012. Pak Samad juga berkata, beliau bukan penganjur perhimpunan sebaliknya hanya diundang membaca puisi. Sementara itu, Pengarah Eksekutif Empower Maria Chin Abdullah yang turut dipanggil memberi keterangan mempersoal tindakan polis yang menyoal siasat orang yang hadir menyambut merdeka. "Kami hanya menyambut merdeka, jadi polis nak dakwa atas kesalahan apa? soalnya. Peguam, Latheefa Koya berkata, polis hanya membuang masa memanggil mereka sedangkan soalan yang ditanya sudah diketahui jawapannya. "Tanya pasal sidang media yang Maria adakan, sedangkan berita ada, video ada, semua ada bukti. Kenapa panggil soal siasat lagi? katanya. Turut hadir peguam Datuk S Ambiga dan ahli jawatankuasa Bersih, Hishammudin Rais. Polis memberi notis kepada Pak Samad yang juga Pengerusi bersama Gabungan Pilihan Raya Adil dan Bersih (Bersih) dan Maria jam 4 petang semalam meminta mereka hadir ke balai polis. Siasatan hari ini merupakan tindakan ketiga ke atas Pak Samad selepas tindakan sama dijalankan ke atasnya pada Mac 2009 berhubung dasar pembelajaran Sains dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeri.Siasatan kedua pula berhubung puisi berjudul "Unggun Bersih" yang dibacanya di majlis pelancaran BERSIH 2.0 pada Jun 2011. Ketua Polis IPD Dang Wangi, ACP Zainuddin Ahmad sebelum ini berkata, polis akan menyiasat sama ada sasterawan itu melanggar undang-undang dengan membaca sajak dalam perhimpunan Janji Demokrasi itu mengikut Akta Perhimpunan Aman 2012.- harakahdaily Janji Demokrasi organiser: Police questions irrelevant... Janji Demokrasi rally organiser Maria Chin Abdullah described the questions posed by the police to her and another key leader A Samad Said during today's interview as "irrelevant".  "They only asked questions about the press conference held at the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (on Aug 24)," she said.She and Samad therefore took the stand of not answering any question, Maria (left) told the media after coming out of the police station. Police had summoned the duo to the Dang Wangi district police headquarters this afternoon to give their statements in relation to the controversial incidents that took place during the Merdeka eve rally at Dataran Merdeka. "The questions they want to know about the press conference were: who were there, what was my role during the press conference and what was my role at Dataran Merdeka. "Who were there and what was the purpose of organising the rally," said Maria. Tag didn't fit person She was represented by lawyer Latheefa Koya while Bersih 2.0 co-chairperson S Ambiga and lawyer Syahredzan Johan represented Samad, who is also co-chairperson of the election reform coalition. The interview lasted some 40 minutes with 25 questions raised.  Samad (centre in photo) said the police notice sent to him yesterday had been cancelled as he was not the rally organiser but simply invited to recite a poem at the event."I was summoned based on irrelevant issues. The notice had been withdrawn. "Several routine questions were asked, but I chose not to answer any of them except those related to my personal information. "There was no question asked about the poem as far as I can remember," said the national laureate. Elaborating further, Ambiga explained that Samad had his statement recorded today as witness under Section 110 of the Penal Code. Yesterday's notice was issued under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2011 and had described Samad as organiser, she added. While the duo was having their statements recorded, some 20 activists from NGOs waited outside the police station in a show of support.- malaysiakini Maria Chin: Soalan polis 'tidak relevan'  
|
|||||
|
Universal Declaration of Peace & Harmony Posted: 06 Sep 2012 09:21 AM PDT 
On this day, the 7th of September, in the Gregorian Year 2012,
let there be a coming together of all Star Lineages
that have contributed their diverse strands of experience and genetic heritage
unto informing the Rainbow Tribes of Earth Humanity,
and the entire spectrum of discrete lifeforms within the Biosphere,
that we collectively call
The Dance of Life.
Many of us continue to bear the residual pain of wounds and scars
sustained in the course of countless battles on all the planes,
inner and outer,
against those Fragmented Aspects of Our Greater Selves
that would not recognize and acknowledge
the Freedom and Integrity of our Sovereign Beings,
as Beloved Offspring of the Primordial Mother and Father -
indeed Prime Creator Source itself -
through all the stages of Cosmic Evolution,
conscious and otherwise,
voluntary or involuntary.
We have witnessed the grievous animosity and antagonism,
carried over within the molecular memory banks,
of warring factions across the Aeons:
between the Reptilians and the Primates;
between those of Sirian tutelage and those of the Pleiadian;
the Children of the One and the Sons of Belial;
Elohim and Nefilim;
Dark Lords and Jedi Knights;
Arcturian Emissaries and Emanations of the Orion Light Council;
Aldebaranian and Betelgeusian; Procyonian and Fomalhautian;
Rigelian and Aetherian; Martian and Venusian; Jupiterian and Saturnian;
Galactic Federation and Intergalactic Guardian Alliance;
Jews and Gentiles; Christians and Moslems; Hindus and Buddhists;
Palestinian and Israeli; Catholic and Protestant; Cowboys and Indians;
humanoid and insectoid; cuboid and spheroid;
Dreamtimers and Machinetimers;
Leftists and Rightists; Centrists and Dentists and Mentists and Adventists;
Wheelers and Dealers and Healers and Feelers;
and we hereby declare that
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
I refer specifically to the powerful imprint of the Tragedy of Avalon,
wherein the New Ways supplanted the Old through Force of Arms,
indeed, at swordpoint and on pain of excruciating death,
and wherein the Ancient Magick was driven from the Blessed Isles
by Slayers of Dragons bearing the Cross of Oppression,
instigated by the Elohim in the name of the Tetragrammaton, IHVH.
And all who had dedicated their lives in service to the ancient Pendragon bloodline
were reduced in status and cast out to perish in obscurity,
wandering the face of the Earth in disguise,
hiding their Druidic wisdom in riddles and childish rhymes.
It is time now to let these old wounds heal:
to remember the rôles we each played out, the dire oaths we swore -
that cruel injustice be avenged, the high and mighty brought low,
and the forgotten and forsaken once again be hailed as heroes and heroines,
and exalted.
Do you remember the stories of glory and of sacrifice,
the defeats and victories, the love triangles and tragic romances,
the secret alliances and desperate betrayals,
we have each played out in the Holographic Hell
that is even now fading away like a nightmare
upon our Awakening?
REMEMBER...
and be restored, now and forever, unto Wholeness and Harmony,
that we may all sing and dance and laugh and love one another
in innocence and purity, without armor or masks,
in the Rose Garden that the
Glorious House of Ram
built.
REMEMBER...
the UNITY in COMMUNITY, the ALL-ONE-ness in ALONE,
The ONE in H-ONE-STY,
indeed,
let us honor even the PIG within us that dwells in the STY of Hone-STY...
so that the EARTH-HEART we call H.O.M.E.
will once again reveal her True Beauty as the Lady Melina -
and our Beloved Planet shall once more flow
with sweet HONE-st-Y and the MILK of Human Kindness.
Let there be no farther or "Father" di-VISION
in the EYE or "I" that is SINGLE -
or div-IS-ion in our molecular IS-ness!
With All-Encompassing & Deep-Healing Love,
Antares
~^@^~
xxx+xxx
Some rights reserved © Antares/Magick River
You may borrow and/or modify content for your own blog
but please credit and backlink, thanks.
|
|||||
|
In Sabah. some very clumsy politicians shoot themselves in the foot Posted: 06 Sep 2012 10:35 AM PDT
Bet you also didn't know that the area of TPAS (Totally protected areas) reserves in Sabah is reaching 1.3 million ha or about 20% of Sabah’s total land area, even exceeding the IUCN standard of 10%. The latest addition is about 180,000 ha — the 55,000 ha. wildlife corridor linking Maliau Basin, lmbak Canyon to Danum/Ulu Segama and the re-classification of Ulu Segama (130,000 ha) to total protected status. And you were most probably ignorant of the fact that under current Chief Minister Musa Aman, Sabah has seen the greatest extent of TPAS expansion in the history of Sabah, despite enormous opportunity cost of conservation! These are FACTS that most of us didn't know and weren't really thinking about. But thanks to some daft politicians in Sabah who, on orders from their orang Malaya masters, were trying to take Musa Aman down with wild allegations of timber/logging kickbacks, we are now drawn to the good things the Sabah government has done - but has not been shouting about - to protect the state's forests. Read more about a winning battle against illegal and excessive logging H E R E. 
|
|||||
|
Despite CEDAW, women workers in the private sector are not protected from discrimination Posted: 06 Sep 2012 07:49 AM PDT Women in Malaysia, despite Malaysia's ratifying of CEDAW, continue to be discriminated against. This would include women workers in the private sector.. Even though, Malaysia's constitution guarantees Equality....it is not for all. Some in Malaysia can discriminate on grounds of gender, etc and it is allowed..and legal. 8. Equality.
And, the fact is that this guarantee of equality and/or non discrimination only is for workers employed by government and government agencies - not to workers employed in the private sector. This came to light, amongst others, in the Beatrice Fernandez case. Recently the same was reiterated in the Guppy Plastic case - whereby this case challenged the fact that women were required to retire at 50 and men at 55 claiming that this was discrimination on the grounds of gender...
We want the guarantee of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of gender, etc for everyone in Malaysia. It must be a guarantee enjoyed by all workers, both in public and private sector. Laws can be enacted that rights contained therein will supercede existing contracts and agreements, and as a precedence we have that in Malaysia's Employment Act 1955, whereby section 7 does this...It matters not what your employment contract says, you can rely on better terms, conditions and rights contained in the law...
Likewise, should not the fundamental rights/liberties guaranteed in our Constitution, i.e. the guarantee of equality and equal treatment...the guarantee that there will be NO discrimination on the basis of GENDER, etc also apply to all in Malaysia. We have been independent for 55 years, but the government has failed to ensure that women are not discriminated against on the basis of their gender... WOMEN workers not being employed by government or government agencies are still being discriminated against in Malaysia. Malaysia ratified/aceded/signed the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in 1995, and in 2001, the Federal Constitution to include 'gender' in Art 8(2)...but in reality private corporations and employers are still free to discriminate women - women workers... When Malaysia ratifies/signs a UN Convention, it is best that an Act be enacted that clearly states that all rights and obligations contained therein is now part of Malaysian law, and overrides all provisions in other existing laws and subsidiary legislation that is contrary to the said Convention. Now, what is done is that the Government makes amendment in this law and that to ensure compliance - and, of course, some may be missed out by the law makers/drafters - but if there exist a law that immediately puts into effect UN, ILO or other Conventions and/or Instruments that Malaysia has already publicly adopted/accepted/acceded to/signed/ratified, it would be good for all in Malaysia and these can be raised in courts... And, the courts' findings will assist the government to make the necessary amendments to the laws to bring it in line with the said Convention... This really is not a new thing. For even today, many existing laws/regulations/etc are being challenged as being contrary to the Federal Constitution...so when CEDAW was ratified, by law it should have immediately been put into effect by such a law... Slowly, the government law drafters can vet the hundreds of existing law and make necessary amendments as they find inconsistencies and non-compliance with CEDAW... I am sure CEDAW does not women workers, by virtue of they being in the private sector and not in the public sector, to be discriminated by reason of their gender. This state of affairs itself is DISCRIMINATION - for people are being discriminated on the basis of who their employer is, i.e. the government or some private corporation/company/person.. What is scary is that every worker, not in the employ of government or government bodies, can be discriminated against on the basis of religion, race, descent, place of birth or gender. I wonder also why Art. 8(2) only refers to citizens and not all persons as in Art. 8(1) 
|
|||||
|
Posted: 06 Sep 2012 06:05 AM PDT  Haram Al-Shariff Al Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem, Palestine This was something really interesting which happened early this morning. Israeli Jews which had Isreali armed military escort, broke into Haram Al-Shariff Al Aqsa Mosque, to perform Talmudic rituals.
Haram Al-Shariff is Muslims third most sacred mosque in the world. It is the site where Muhamad S.A.W. mounted the Buraq to be taken to the heavens in a holy incidence known as Israq Mikraj, met God Al Mighty. It is also when Muslims were commanded to perform prayers, five times in a day and kneel before God Al Mighty seventeen times within the same time.
The Israelis have been tunneling under the mosque for quite sometime now. The Zionist Jews need hard evidence to prove the Temple of Solomon, which they believe to be on the same spot where the Haram Al-Shariff now exist.
According to the Al Quran, Yaacob built the first mosque forty years after Abraham. Solomon, which is a prophet, expanded the mosque. The Israelis have a supporter within Malaysian political system. In 2008 just days after the ‘Political Tsunami’ and Opposition won 5 + 1 states, Jerusalem Post published this:
Lets hear it from Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, who is darling of the West and Neo Con Jews, on this incursion on Muslims’ third holiest mosque in the world.  
|
|||||
|
Berikut adalah SOP polis untuk gari pesalah... Posted: 06 Sep 2012 12:33 AM PDT  Kalau pesalah itu kroni BN/UMNO atau rakan sekerja beginilah SOPnya...       Kalau pesalah tu orang awam,penyokong, pemimpin Pembangkang, NGO beginilah SOPnya....    Gari gadis 'sangat lembut', kata polis... Ketua Polis Kuala Lumpur Datuk Mohmad Salleh mempertahankan tindakan menggari gadis yang didakwa memijak gambar Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak semasa perhimpunan Janji Demokrasi sebagai "lembut dan mengikut prosedur". "Gari ini prosedur tangkapan. Prosedur menangkap orang, gari. Itup un saya rasa, gari pun sangat lembut (very mild). Kalau ikut (betul-betul) gari ini di belakang. "Jadi bila tangkap orang, isu gari bukan satu isu. Apa pun tangkapan suspek mesti gari... (Ia) memang asas yang diperuntukkan oleh undang-undang. Bukan menjadi satu kesalahan kita menangkap pesalah, dengan menggunakan gari," katanya. Pemberita sebelum itu menunjukkan keratan sebuah akhbar berbahasa Cina kepada Mohmad dan meminta beliau menjelaskan kenapa gadis yang menyerah diri itu digari tangannya.- malaysiakini  Cops: Handcuffed girl got it 'very mild'... The Kuala Lumpur police chief Mohmad Salleh has defended his men for handcuffing a 19-year-old girl who surrendered herself yesterday. Speaking to reporters today, Mohmad said the the matter was considered "light" and that proper procedures were followed. "Handcuffing someone is an arrest procedure... I think (in her case) it was very mild. If we follow (the procedures strictly), she would be cuffed behind her back.  "So during an arrest, the handcuffs are not an issue. In any arrest, the suspect must be handcuffed."This is prescribed by law. It is not wrong for us to use handcuffs when apprehending a (suspect)," he said. He was responding to questions from reporters at a function in Kuala Lumpur. Mohmad was shown a news clipping depicting the girl in handcuffs. The girl is accused of violating the Sedition Act 1948 at Dataran Merdeka on Merdeka Day eve by stepping on Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's photograph.- malaysiakini Ini tak boleh kerana PM...  Ini boleh kerana pemimpin pembangkang...     cheers. 
|
|||||
|
Posted: 06 Sep 2012 12:19 AM PDT 
|
|||||
|
Workers’ and trade union rights in BN-ruled Malaysia (Part 2) Posted: 06 Sep 2012 12:21 AM PDT The first part of this article could be found in Worker and trade union rights in BN-ruled Malaysia (Part 1)Workers’ and trade union rights in BN-ruled Malaysia (Part 2)By Aliran, on 25 August 2012 Under this pro-business BN government, trade unions have been weakened and workers’ bargaining powers eroded, writes Charles Hector.  Photograph: Jerit As of January 2012, the employed labour force in Malaysia was about 12.4m. Out of this, only 798,941 workers (6.44 per cent) are members of trade unions, of which about 53 per cent are private sector workers, 38 per cent public sector workers, and 9 per cent workers of statutory bodies/local authorities, after more than 50 years of independence. It is obvious that this Malaysian government has not been actively promoting the formation of trade unions. In fact, its more recent policies seem directed towards the weakening of trade unions. Electronic workers, for example, have still not yet been allowed to form a national union. The only concession made after years of struggle was when the BN allowed the formation of four regional unions in the Peninsula in 2010 (The Star, 1 May 2010). The perception amongst workers is that this government has favoured unions that represent workers in the public sector, statutory bodies and local authorities, who have enjoyed wage increases, cost of living allowances (Cola) and other benefits. The primary motive, however, may not be acknowledgement of the rights and welfare of workers; instead, it is to woo these workers to support the Umno-led BN coalition. That said, the perks and ‘special treatment’ of these workers just prior to elections does not necessarily translate into blind loyalty to the BN cause. For today, the people, including workers in the public sector, have awakened from their slumber, thanks to the availability of more information via the alternative media and exposure to the global media. Hence, they will vote in the upcoming elections as they please! Another reason for the declining number of workers involved in the trade unions is the growing use of short-term contract employment, temporary and/or casual employees at the workplace. Such short-term and temporary employment which can be terminated by not renewing the employment contracts have made such workers disinclined to form, let alone join and actively participate in, trade unions. The fact that unions often hold general meetings and elect their leaders once every three years, further discourages short-term contract workers from active participation in the unions. Trade union membership in Malaysia 2006-2012  Source: Department of Trade Union Affairs website Compounded with this is the emergence of a new class of workers commonly known as ‘outsourced workers’, who are not considered employees of the principal or owner of the workplaces. As such, they are not allowed to join in-house unions or even regional/national unions. As well, they cannot resort to Collective Agreements, since these are agreements between employers and direct worker-employees. With no law limiting the percentage of ‘outsourced workers’ working at a particular workplace, they can account for up to 50 per cent of total workers in some factories. The Trade Union Act also provides that when a worker has been terminated, he/she automatically will cease to be a member of the trade union. At a time like this, when a worker really needs the support and assistance of the trade union, he/she is legally deprived of union membership. In this regard, there have been an increasing number of cases wherein active union leaders have been dismissed. Often, the reason advanced by their employer is that they have brought disrepute and/or insulted the management of their employer-company – eg, Hata Wahari, the president of the National Union of Journalists, and more recently Chen Ka Fatt and Abdul Jamil Lalaludeen, respectively, honorary treasurer and vice-president of the National Union of Bank Employees (Nube) were dismissed. In the latter two cases, the Nube leaders apparently had participated in a rally outside the United Nations building in Geneva where they carried a banner declaring “Maybank robs poor Malaysian workers” (Harakah, 7 Feb 2012). Workers should not be terminated, save by reason of non-performance of their job and/or some infringement/breach at the workplace or related to work. It is wrong to start dismissing workers because they criticise their employers. Erosion of the right to permanent employment Permanent employment is a basic right, essential for the well being and welfare of workers and their families. One’s employment usually determines where one will settle-down, buy homes and land, where one fs children will go to school and even where one fs spouse will find employment. With short-term contracts increasingly the practice, it is stressful for the worker not knowing whether at the end of his contract period, he or she will still be employed at the workplace. In our employment laws, what was clearly envisaged was permanent employment until retirement. Accordingly, the Employment Act 1955 contains clauses that provide for gradual increases in entitlements to annual leave, sick leave and even the calculation of termination and lay-off benefits. Even when it comes to retrenchment, there was the Last In First Out (LIFO) policy, that protected workers with longer periods of service. Indeed, the law imposed the obligation on employers to first attempt to provide alternative employment within the workplace, before having to let an employee go. This right to permanent employment has systematically been replaced with short-term or fixed duration contracts of employment, sometimes less than one year, with no guarantee or safeguard of a renewal of employment contract even if the employer still needs workers at the end of the contract period. For those, who already are permanent employees, employers have used various means to destroy this relationship and to replace it with short-term contracts. One method used is the outsourcing of work to third parties: forcing employees to leave and to enter into a new contract with these new third party employers, or face retrenchment. Another method employed in Malaysia is the Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS). Ironically, many workers have lost permanent employment and only to be re-employed by the same employer, this time as short-term contract workers. Public sector employees also lost permanent employment with pension rights when state entities were privatised and this continues to happen. Employers now can very easily get rid of workers who are older, ‘problematic’ (because they are demanding rights or even getting involved in union activities), pregnant or partially disabled following an industrial accident. Or they may just not offer them a new contract of employment. This effectively diminishes significantly the workers’ ability to fight for better wages, working conditions and other employment benefits. The provisions for employing temporary or casual workers also gives the Minister the power to reduce workers f rights guaranteed by the parent Act for these workers. Having different classes of workers at the workplace strengthens the ability of employers to ‘divide and rule’ workers – hence greater power to control workers while eroding the workers’ ability to demand better rights. ‘Bonded’ migrant workers Initially, the Malaysian government created Free Trade Zones near the bigger towns, and workers from all over the country came to work. As time passed and wages remained low while the cost of living rose and the quality of life declined, workers started moving back to their home towns and new workers were less inclined to come. The government then allowed these factories to be established all over Malaysia, especially where the workers and their families resided. Today, there are over 200 industrial estates, free commercial zones and free industrial zones spread all over the country. As time went on, Malaysian workers demanded higher wages and better working conditions. Instead of facilitating these demands, the Malaysian government came to the assistance of employers by bringing in more controllable and cheaper labour, namely, the migrant workers, who were obliged to work for one employer only which, invariably enabled employers to oppress these workers. After all, if the migrant workers were dissatisfied, the only choice they had was to quit and return to their home country. In fact, even this is not a real option – for these workers would have spent a lot of money and incurred debts when they chose to come to Malaysia as migrant workers. Access to justice is available to migrant workers just like any other worker, but when they complain of rights violations or start using these legal mechanisms, the response of many employers is simply termination of their employment: work passes/visas would be cancelled, disallowing the workers to legally remain in the country. Hence, they would lose any right to pursue their claims in the Labour Courts or via other avenues. If they stay on in the country ‘illegally’, they risk being arrested, detained, charged in court, convicted, whipped, and thereafter deported. The fact that they have valid claims or have lodged complaints in relevant avenues for justice is irrelevant. Hence, migrant workers became a preferred source of labour for many employers – bonded and forced to work for the one employer, so very easily forced to work overtime, denied rest days and even public holidays. Fortunately, there has emerged some measure of workers’ solidarity and Malaysian workers and trade unions, including the MTUC began to accept migrant workers as workers, and started fighting for the rights of migrant workers too. The unions accepted migrant workers as members of trade unions, irrespective of the fact that one of the conditions of these migrant workers’ work passes/visas denies them the freedom of association. The unions, including the MTUC, have been ready and willing to take the matter to court if any employer, or the Malaysian government, contests the right of migrant workers to join unions or to benefit from Collective Agreements. Besides migrant workers, the Malaysian government also created other classes of workers – temporary and casual workers. Such different categories of workers kept them divided and prevented them from joining existing unions. Using labour without entering into employment relationship In fact, short-term contract workers, migrant workers or the other types of workers are employees of the factory and workplaces they work in. Hence, employers have duties and obligations to ensure that the rights and welfare of these worker-employees, as contained in existing national laws and in collective agreements, are provided for. Alas, in 2005, the Malaysian government came up with a policy that allowed factories and workplaces to use workers, without having to enter into any employment relationship with these workers. A new entity was created called ‘outsourcing agents/companies’ , who would be labour/manpower suppliers, who would be supplying workers to factories and workplaces. Under the Private Employment Agencies Act 1971, private employment agencies are considered the employers of these workers, and will continue to be the employer of the workers even after they start working in particular factories and workplaces. These workers are commonly known as ‘outsourced workers’. In contrast, the ‘outsourcing agencies/companies’ are not considered to be the employers of these outsourced workers. Significantly, it was not the Ministry of Human Resources but the Ministry of Home Affairs that issued the licence/permits to these ‘outsourcing agents/companies’. In this regard, I believe that this new Act runs contrary to the spirit of existing laws and principles. In the beginning, this practice applied only to migrant workers. It was later extended to cover local workers too. Consequently, in some factories today, about 50 per cent of the workforce is made up of these ‘outsourced workers’ who are not employees of the factory and/or workplace. Accordingly, they cannot join workplace unions and/or benefit from Collective Agreements either. The ‘outsourcing agents/companies’ set-up is a very profitable business with little or no risk, even from their ‘employees’, who even if they were to strike would not affect these labour suppliers (‘contractors for labour’). After all, they do not run factories; indeed, there is no work that needs to be performed in order to generate profits. This is a form of what might be called ‘rentier capitalism’! In 2010, the Malaysian government took steps to give statutory recognition to this unjust employment practice and relationship. They wanted to give legal recognition to these ‘contractors for labour’ – these labour suppliers. They wanted to confirm that the ‘contractor for labour’ is the employer, and remains the employer of these ‘outsourced workers’ even after they start working in the workplaces of principals. All this was achieved, despite strong protests coming from workers, their unions, MTUC, civil society groups not just within Malaysia but also internationally. The amendments proposed was passed and came into effect on 1 April 2012. The use of ‘outsourced workers’ or outside workers at workplaces by principals are growing, and it also happens in government-linked companies. For example, the TNB Junior Officers Union protested in early 2012 against the employment and use of eoutsourced workers f by TNB. The Minister of Human Resources recently announced an exemption of some (but not all) of the recent amendments concerning ‘contractor for labour’ to all sectors except the agricultural sector. In fact, it was just a reaffirmation of ‘contractors for labour’ and the continued use of ‘outsourced workers’ by principals who do not consider them as their employees. There is no doubt that such arrangements run contrary to the sentiments and principles governing employment relationships of the International Labour Organization. Our own Employment Act also clearly states that ‘the person or class of persons employed, engaged or contracted with to carry out the work shall be deemed to be an employee or employees and (a) the principal or owner of the agricultural or industrial undertaking, constructional work, trade, business or place of work; or (b) the statutory body or local government authority, shall be deemed to be the employer’. Rightfully all involved in the business of finding and supplying workers must be private employment agencies, governed by the Private Employment Agencies Act 1971, who for their services will be paid a fixed one-time fee. They will thereafter have no other relationship, let alone employment relationships, with the workers after they are accepted and start working for the principal. The workers will then become the principal fs employees. Hence this provision for ‘contractors for labour’ is totally against the spirit of our own Employment Act! The MTUC and workers have continued to protest against this provision for labour contractors. In 2012, the Malaysian Bar passed a Resolution unanimously calling for the maintenance of a two-party employment relationship between workers and the principal to the exclusion of all thid parties, especially the ‘contractor for labour’. Regardless of whether they are called labour/manpower suppliers or outsourcing companies/agents, there must be just one class of workers – all of whom are employees of the principal – who can join the unions at the workplace and fight as one for better workers’ rights and benefits. The way forward The BN government seems to have lost its way and abandoned its duties and obligations to improve the rights and welfare of persons, workers and their families. Slowly but surely workers’ and trade union rights have been eroded. The government needs to stop being pro-employer and pro-business, concerned only with big profits. It must do what is needed immediately to restore the rights of workers to permanent employment until retirement, to strengthen trade unions, which is an essential tool for the protection and improvement of the livelihood of workers, and most importantly to maintain the two-party employment relationship. Charles Hector is a human rights lawyer based in Temerloh. Part 1 of this article appeared in the previous issue of Aliran Monthly. 
|
|||||
|
Posted: 06 Sep 2012 07:31 AM PDT The Chief Minister has revealed that 750 acres of land in Batu Kawan was sold at between RM3.05 and RM4 per square foot in 2004. The information was contained in a press statement released by Guan Eng yesterday. This would be prime land on the mainland next to the site where the second Penang Bridge [Read more]
|
|||||
|
Surat dari Sukma Darmawan kepada Anwar Ibrahim (KENANGAN) Posted: 05 Sep 2012 09:45 PM PDT
NOTA: Sempena Ulangtahun Peristiwa Tragis September 2 1998, Tulang Besi membawa kembali satu surat yang didakwa ditulis oleh SUkma kepada Anwar Ibrahim sejurus selepas Sukma dibebaskan dari tahanan ISA.
Tulang Besi berharap mereka yang terus menerus menuduh Anwar meliwat tu berhenti dan bertaubat nasuha, kalau kamu betul2 beriman dengan Allah dan Rasul.
(Bermula)Assalamualaikum wr.wbh. Abang Anwar yang diingati, saya harap Abang Anwar sihat. Saya Alhamdulillah, sehat. Hanya pemikiran saya saja yang kurang sehat, kerana saya masih terkenangkan peristiwa pertama-tama ditangkap polis, dimasukkan ke lokap dan disoal siasat dan yang paling menyedihkan ialah saya dipaksa untuk mengaku dan menandatangani dokumen2 yang kononnya saya ada hubongan sejenis dengan Bang Anwar, Azizan dan Meor, serta Ismail dll. yang saya tidak pernah mengenalinya. Di sini saya ingin mengambil kesempatan untuk memohon berjuta2 ampun dan maaf karena telah memburukkan nama Abang Anwar yg mana Abang sendiri tidak pernah melakukannya. Saya harap Abang dapat mengerti kerana saya terpaksa dan dipaksa. Bang Anwar…..maafkan saya?! Dihari penangkapan saya saya berada di restoran di Lot 10 dg Kak Mala. Betapa malunya, saya digari tangan dihadapan beratus2 orang dimana saya tidakpun membuat sebarang kesalahan. Selepas itu saya dibawa ke rumah saya di Tivoli dan mereka menggeledah rumah saya dan memecahkan pintu kamar saya. Tak taulah apa yg mereka cari dan telahpun terbukti saya tidakpun mempunyai atau menyimpan apa-apa barang yang salah disisi undang2. Akhirnya mereka mengambil passport, & diary (kosong/hanya alamat) dan album2 lama saya. Kemudian saya dibawa ke Bukit Aman ke tingkat 11 pejabat Tuan Musa dan Tuan Rodwan. Mereka harus mengisi borang penahanan saya, tetapi mereka tidak tahu penahanan saya atas sebab apa. Sebab mereka saling bertanyakan sesama mereka saya ditahan atas sebab apa?! & setengah jam mereka fikir2, akhirnya mereka menulis penahanan saya atas sebab tertentu. Yang mana sampai sekarang puas saya tak tahu. Mereka hanya memberitahu untuk penyiasatan. Begitu juga dgn mahkamah. Beliau tidak memberi tahu sebab penahanan saya. Saya hanya diberitahu ditahan di bawah Akta 177 sahaja. Di mana ini berlaku dikeesokan harinya dan saya tahu benar mereka mengenali sesama-satu dg rapat (orang mahkamah & Rodwan). Di sini saya rasakan penahanan saya ini sebenarnya ialah "penculikan". Dihari ke 3 saya dibawa kesebuah bilik di tingkat 3, di sini saya ditelanjangi (naked) dgn keadaan aircon. yang sangat2 dingin dan saya disoal siasat dgn cara yg sangat kasar. Dicaci, dihina, dipukul, ditelanjangi, digari oleh 6 orang petugas. Begitu juga dg cermin mata saya dilempar dan diketuk2 ke meja dan lantai. Nasib baik tidak pecah (plastik). Saya tidak dapat berkata apa2 karena hanya tuhan saja yg tahu betapa sakitnya badan, hati dan pemikiran saya pd. ketika itu. Saya kembali ke lokap (sel). Di lokap polis2 bertanyakan samada saya dipukul atau tidak, tapi saya kata tidak, padahal betapa sakitnya badan saya ketika itu. Saya takut menceritakan keadaan sebenar (dipukul) kpd polis di lokap. Takut salah dan takut dipukul lagi. Asma saya pun kambuh lagi dg teruk, kerana pd waktu itu saya hanya memakai seluar dalam saja dg keadaan yang dingin dan lembab di sel (lokap). Keesokan harinya saya ditemukan dgn seorang doktor forensik untuk pemeriksaan DNA kononnya. Sekali lagi saya ditelanjangi (naked) di hadapan pegawai dan difoto. Mereka mengambil darah saya (tiga botol), rambut saya dan rambut ketiak & kemaluan, tapi yg paling menyedihkan mereka menyuruh dokter TSB untuk memasukkan tangannya (3 jari) ke dalam dubur saya. Ya…Allah, sakitnya! Kemudian saya dibawa ke bilik siasat lagi. Di sini saya dipaksa lagi untuk bercerita mengenai hubungan saya dgn Bang Anwar. Padahal saya telah jelaskan dg sebenarnya bahwa Bang Anwar bukan sekadar Abang Angkat tapi sebagai ayah saya sendiri. Tetapi semakin saya bercerita benar, mereka semakin ganas terhadap saya, dgn memberitahu saya akan ditahan di bawa Akta ISA mereka boleh simpan peluru dirumah atau dikereta saya ataupun mereka boleh membeli 1 peluru untuk menembak saya. (Katanya, peluru murah aje…45 cent). Ataupun saya bercerita kpd mereka dan akan dibebaskan minggu depan. Dari sinilah bermulanya reka2an cerita saya. Semakin saya reka semakin bahagialah mereka. Saya katakan saya ada hubungan dengan Abang sejak mula saya datang ke K.L. sehinggalah ke bulan April yg lalu. Mereka sangat sibuk menulis cerita rekaan saya seolah-olah mereka sedang menyiapkan novel. Dari mula inilah saya dibukakan gari tangan, dibenarkan memakai baju, diberi makan & minum yg enak dan rokok, dengan satu "harapan" saya, saya akan dibebaskan minggu depan. Setelah seminggu berlalu, mereka masih tetap tidak membebaskan saya dg alasan kerja2 belum siap. Rupa2nya mereka masih belum puas dg cerita rekaan saya itu. Disinilah saya disangkut pautkan dengan nama2 seperti Azizan dan Ismail dan banyak lagi nama2 termasuk semua staff saya baik lelaki maupun perempuan. (Mereka ini benar2 gila!) dan arwah Tan Sri Yahya (sedih saya dibuatnya) tetapi akhirnya mereka memutuskan untuk bercerita mengenai Azizan dan Ismail. Bermulalah cerita rekaan saya lagi sampai mereka pun naik birahi. Dan mereka, terutamanya Rodwan berpuluh-puluh kali agar saya bercerita soal Azizan dg secara terperinci, seolah-olah kita buat bertiga. Setiap kali mereka menyiapkan novelnya, saya sentiasa bertanya bila nak bebaskan saya dan jangan "charge" saya di mahkamah. Mereka hanya jawab, besok…besok…dan besok! Dan mereka bersumpah tidak akan "charge" saya. Hanya dua hari lagi tahanan reman saya akan berakhir. Rodwan datang menemui saya di lokap dan memberitahu saya akan dibebaskan besok dg (satu) syarat saya hendaklah membuat confession (pengakuan) di hadapan Hakim dan harus dititikberatkan (detail) mengenai cerita hubungan bertiga dg Azizan (He said: Please….please….very very detail). Maka terhasillah pengakuan saya dihadapan Hakim (dimana mereka juga kawan rapat Rodwan & Musa, melalui telefon dan perjumpaan dihadapan saya). Tetapi dasar mereka licik, jahat, penipu dan kejam, dihari2 terakhir (Sabtu) saya dipanggil Tuan Musa untuk charge saya di court. Menurutnya, saya telah membuat kesalahan melakukan hubungan jenis dg you & Azizan. Di sini saya meminta kebenaran untuk tel. Family untuk panggil lawyer. Dia cakap "kamu sudah ada lawyer Ganesan, tapi saya tak benarkan karena Ganesan telah curi Ismail". Dia juga berkata: "Kamu ada lawyer Zulkifli Nordin yg dilantik oleh kakak kamu, tapi kalau gunakan Zulkifli saya akan charge kamu di Alta 377A & B (minimum 5 tahun dan sebat) tetapi kalau gunakan lawyer saya (Polis) awak akan dicharge 377D (minimum 1 hari penjara dan denda)". Dan dengan syarat saya harus mengaku salah, kalau tidak mereka akan tangkap lagi dan charge 377A kes dg Azizan. Dan kalau saya cakap2 atau meminta rayuan kepada lawyer2 sendiri atau lawyer2 Anwar saya akan dicharge lagi dgn 377B. Dari sebab inilah saya mengaku salah di mahkamah, di mana saya terus ditipu bukan 1 hari penjara tapi 6 bulan. Dari sini saya sudah bertekad untuk melantik Karpal Singh (lawyer) sbg peguam saya mewakili kes saya. Tapi saya tak berkesempatan untuk memberitahu sesiapa. Saya ada berjumpa Karpal Singh di Kajang (kes orang lain). Ingin rasanya berjumpa dgnnya dan terus melantiknya, tapi tak sempat sebab pegawai dari Bukit Aman datang untuk mengambil saya. (Karpal pun melihat pd. masa itu). Setelah 3 minggu berlalu, keluarlah cerita baru, yaitu Meor, dimana beliau terpedaya seperti saya, tapi dia lebih teruk kerana dia lebih lemah dari saya. Yang saya marah dengan Meor ialah dia membabitkan nama saya (dipaksa oleh Polis). Jadi di sini saya menjadi saksi mereka dan dipaksa agar menceritakan keterbabitan saya. Dimana saya hanya mengenali beliau 5 tahun lalu sebagai tukang jahit dan memperkenalkan pada Kak Izah. Itu saja. Hai….tak taulah kenapa mereka begitu kejam terhadap Bang Anwar. Hmm…disinilah saya sekrang (sel no.8) tetapi saya sangat dimanja oleh tuan2 tingkat 11 kerana mereka masih memujuk untuk menandatangani report polis yg saya tidak melantik mana2 lawyer. Dan mereka mengharapkan saya sebagai saksi mereka dlm kes you tapi sampai sekarang saya tidak mau menanda tangani apa2 lagi form. Serik! Jadi saya dibawa jalan2 ke Melaka (shopping), Jasin makan ikan bakar, ke pantai sampai jam 2 pagi. Gila! Saya dipaksa pakai topi supaya tidak dikenali. Minggu depan saya mau dibawa ke Trengganu atau Bandung-Ind. Untuk 3 hari cuti bersama mereka di kampung saya. Tapi saya tidak mau pergi. Sakit hati saya. Sampai disini sahaja. Banyak lagi cerita yg menyakitkan yg saya tak sempat ceritakan disini. Saya rindu family kita. Take care! Sembah sujud penuh kemaafan, Tandatangan  
|
|||||
|
Posted: 06 Sep 2012 07:04 AM PDT Tunglang recalls what life was like in Madras Lane in the 1960s and 70s: Madras Lane was once a quaint part of inner city George Town. Famed for its copra mill (that’s how it is called Yew Kar Lor, Hokkien for Copra Mill Lane), you would find a row of prewar houses, two sundry shops, [Read more]
|
|||||
|
Khalid Dakwa Pejabat Setiausaha Sulit DYMM Tuanku Berbohong? Posted: 05 Sep 2012 09:40 PM PDT i. Berhubung dengan kenyataan Menteri Besar bahawa sejak 2003 DYMM Tuanku Sultan Selangor tidak dijemput ke program Ambang Merdeka, saya nyatakan bahawa kenyataan tersebut adalah tidak benar. Semasa di bawah Barisan Nasional Tuanku Sultan Selangor sentiasa dijemput secara rasmi dan lisan. Ini disahkan sendiri oleh Setiausaha Sulit DYMM Tuanku dalam media massa beberapa hari lalu. Adakah Tan Sri
|
|||||
|
LGBT di Melaka Bila UMNO Nak Benteras? Posted: 05 Sep 2012 09:20 PM PDT
NOTA: Kalau mengikut artikel di bawah ini, Melaka menjadi tumpuan pondan2 antarabangsa bagi industri pelacuran pondan. Tulang Besi cuma hairan dalam UMNO sebuk2 menentang LGBT ni, bila mereka nak benteras industri pondan di negeri kubu kuat UMNO ini.
Yang kita dengar unjuran nak buat asrama untuk ibu mengandung luar nikah serta pemanjangan tempoh waktu operasi pusat2 hiburan walaupun di bulan puasa.  Mengikut laporan THE STAR 4 October 2011 di atas, pondan2 di Melaka sedang menghadapi masaalah untuk menjalankan "perniagaan" mereka di Taman Melaka Raya. Ini kerana pondan-pondan dari luar negeri sedang menjajah tempat biasa itu dan menyebabkan pondan2 tempatan terpaksa lari ke tempat lain. Kebanjiran pondan dari luar negeri ini sangat2 tidak disukai oleh pondan-pondan tempatan. Namun, pondan2 ini dilindungi serta bilangan mereka terlampau ramai. Akhirnya, pondan2 tempatan terpaksa mengaku kalah dan melarikan diri ke tempat lain. Selepas ni, kita kena panggil Melaka "Darul Pondan". Tak tau lah berapa UMNO dapat dari industri pondan ni, tapi takkan kerajaan UMNO Melaka tidak maklum berkaitan dengan aktiviti pondan di Taman Melaka Raya. Dalam UMNO sebuk2 memfitnah Anwar meliwat Saiful, rupa-rupanya mereka membela industri pondan di Melaka. Yang lebih menghairankan adalah Melaka adalah satu-satunya negeri di Malaysia yang mana UMNO boleh memerintah tanpa parti2 komponen Barisan Nasional. Dengan kata lain, wakil rakyat DUN UMNO sahaja menguasai 2/3 dari seluruh Dewan Undangan Negeri Melaka. Kalau besok UMNO keluar dari Barisan Nasional, UMNO masih boleh perintah Melaka dengan majoriti 2/3. Juga, satu maklumat yang menarik adalah kenyataan seorang pondan dalam artikel di atas. Beliau berkata "industri pondan" ini begitu maju kerana sektor pelancongan Melaka yang begitu pesat. Tahniah kerajaan UMNO/BN Melaka. Mari kita semarakan lagi industri pondan di Melaka. Tulang Besi  
|
|||||
|
Kerajaan PAS Kelantan Tawar Rasuah Kepada Ketua UMNO Posted: 05 Sep 2012 08:21 PM PDT Seorang Ketua UMNO dari sebuah Dewan Undangan Negeri yang diramalkan akan dimenangi oleh Barisan Nasional dalam PRU ke 13 akan tinggalkan UMNO pada minggu hadapan. Tindakan itu dibuat oleh pemimpin tersebut setelah beliau ditawarkan ‘ratusan ekar tanah’ di sempadan Gua Musang – Kuala Krai oleh seorang pemimpin PAS dalam Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan yang juga tokoh [...]
|
|||||
|
Kejadian Serangan Oleh Perkasa Di Masjid (Termasuk Kejadian Didalam Masjid) Posted: 05 Sep 2012 08:10 PM PDT
|
|||||
|
(Video) Fatwa Sheikh Yusof Al Qaradawi Berhubung Fitnah Terhadap Anwar Ibrahim Posted: 05 Sep 2012 07:59 PM PDT
|
|||||
|
Rakaman Ceramah Perdana, Jelajah MerdekaRakyat, Alor Setar 02/09/2012 Posted: 05 Sep 2012 07:51 PM PDT
|
|||||
|
15,000 turned up in Raub and today Federal Court case Posted: 05 Sep 2012 08:55 PM PDT Of interest, a media statement issued by Ban Cyanide Action Committee (BCAC) & 902 Himpunan Hijau Raub Chairman Date: 4-9-2012 Statement: Ban Cyanide in Gold Mining Action Committee (BCAC) urges public to show support to the Raub resident on September 6 at Federal Court Himpunan Hijau Raub (FHHR) and Ban Cyanidei n Gold Mineing Action Committee (BCAC) was encouraged by the turn out of 15,000 people from all walks of life at the peaceful Green Gathering held in Raub last Sunday @2 September 2012. The Committee wishes to take this opportunity to entend our heartfelt gratitute to individuals and organizations that help us to organize this gathering, especially comrades from other green movement, civil societies and organizations; lawyers that offered legal aids and observers; PDRM that facilitated security and traffic control; medical team that provided medical aid; volunteers and all the sponsors. Last but not least, we wish to thank those who participate the gathering and stay until the end of the gathering despite the hot sun, your participation gives a boost to our movement. Although the gathering is a success, and we had voice out our strong objection against the use of cyanide and other hazardous chemical compounds in extracting the gold which will continue to harm the health of the residents and pollute our living environment, but our struggle has not end yet. The Federal Court will hear the appeal of leave application of judicial review brought by the Committee on Sept 6 2012, to seek review of the Department of Environment's approval of the Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment report submitted by Raub Australian Gold Mining SB (RAGM). On 2009, The High Court dismissed the leave application for judicial review with the ground that the residents were out of time to apply for judicial review. On 2011, the committee appealed to Court of Appeal but the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of High Court. The Committee then decided to appeal to Federal Court and was granted leave to appeal. This will be the last chance for the Bukit Koman, Raub residents to seek justice through legal channel. Therefore, we urge the public to support us on Sept 6 (Thursday) , 9am at Palace of Justice, Putrajaya. We hope to see you there! Ban Cyanide in Gold Mining, Reclaim our safe homeland! Ban Cyanide Action Committee (BCAC) & 902 Himpunan Hijau Raub Chairman Contact Persons: Chairman Wong Kin Hoong : 019 -9299028 (Mandarin) Vice Chairman Sherly Hue : 019 -2782859 Court case background: • 13 Jan 1997, DoE approved the PEIA submitted by RAGM without the residents’ knowledge. • 4 Dec 2006, residents learned about the usage of cyanide in the nearby gold mine and formed the “Bukit Koman Action Committee Against the Use of Cyanide in Mining of Gold” (Committee). • October 2007, after various effort and attempts, the residents finally got hold of the PEIA and appointed experts to review the documents. • 21 March 2008, the Committee through its lawyers filed an application for leave for judicial review to request among others the following: a) The setting aside of the approval of the PEIA given on 13-1-1997 by the Director General (DG) of the DoE; b) The setting aside of the DG’s decision that a Detailed EIA is not necessary; c) Submission of a fresh DEIA by RAGM including the requirement for public participation. • 1 June 2009, High Court dismissed the application with no order as to costs on the ground: "The application for leave for judicial review should have been brought within 40 days from the date of the approval of the PEIA or the date the villagers knew about the approval of the PEIA." • On 3August 2011, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision in holding that the residents were out of time in seeking for leave for judicial review (the decision). The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs. • On 7 August 2011, the villagers decided to appeal to the Federal Court. • On 11 Jan 2012, a three-man Federal Court panel chaired by the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Richard Malanjum allowed the residents' application for leave to appeal against the High Court's decision. The appeal will be heard by the Federal Court on 6 September 2012. -- www.bancyanide.com 
|
|||||
|
Wujudkah Mangsa Liwat Anwar Ibrahim Lagi? Posted: 05 Sep 2012 08:18 PM PDT
Diharap tulisan ini dapat membantu anda pembaca di dalam melawan serangan fitnah yang datang dari agen2 UMNO dalam berbagai bentuk
Misalnya bila ditanya kenapa Anwar tidak bersumpah, kita jawab nak sumpah buat apa kalau ketiga-tiga Azizan,Munawar dan Sukma mengaku TIDAK PERNAH DILIWAT ANWAR.
Mahkamah pula membuktikan bahawa bukti2 yg dibawa oleh pihak pendakwaraya dalam kes Saiful ni tak masuk akal.
Bodoh lah Anwar nak sumpah.
Tapi, juak2 UMNO tak kan habis main isu buntut ni.
Hakikatnya, kempen fitnah ni bermula dengan Mahathir.
Mahathir takut rahsia sebenar beliau pecat Anwar ni orang tahu.
Jadi, dipastikan ahli2 dan aktivis mereka termasuk para cyberuk2 mereka terus menerus cerita pasal liwat.
Diharapkan dengan kekerapan mengulang fitnah liwat ini, lambat laun rakyat akan percaya juga.
Kasihan mereka tidak sedar mereka dipergunakan untuk menghinjak larangan Allah SWT yang bernama "QAZAF".
Yang kaya dari kempen fitnah ini adalah anak Mahathir serta kroni2 Mahathir. Anak Mahathir dapat RM1.8 billion semata-mata kerana bangkrap meniaga.
Kroni2 yang lain pun kaya raya kerana waktu Anwar Menteri Kewangan, Anwar berusaha keras tidak izin wang rakyat diguanakan untuk selamat bisnes2 kroni yang rugi melata.
Yg dapat untung dah hidup senang lenang dengan wang rakyat yang berjumlah ratusan juta.
Yg jadi pencaci2 upahan dapatlah mereka sedikit wang serta dosa yang bergunung-gunung. Dosa fitnah serta dosa melanggar hukum Allah serta menghalalkan apa yang Allah SWT haramkan.
Tapi kalau dah nama UMNO tu apa diorang peduli pasal hukum Allah. Nabi mereka adalah Mahathir. Bila Mahathir tolak hukum Allah, orang UMNO semua ikut.
Sekarang ni juak2 UMNO guna video hitam putih kabur untuk fitnah Anwar.
Ganti hukum Allah dgn video hitam putih kabur.
TULANG BESI  
|
PHOTO: AP
| You are subscribed to email updates from xBlog ☪ Magificent Sociopolitical Blogs
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages