use github?

[Jason Yeo]

Are there any plans to use github instead of google code?

It might be easier for people to contribute if we move to github.

[Ian Cordasco]

Bitbucket might be more realistic than GitHub since it supports mercurial. In case you hadn't noticed the repository is not a git repository. I don't know what Kris or the other developers think of moving, but if they were yo do so, I suspect it would be to a service that provides mercurial support.

On Sep 3, 2012 6:21 AM, "Jason Yeo" <jason...@gmail.com> wrote:

Are there any plans to use github instead of google code?

It might be easier for people to contribute if we move to github.

--
 
 
 

[pentadactyl]

Github would attract a lot of patches and there's hopefully nothing to prevent somebody making a github hosted mirror that sees google code as upstream. However, there's so much good work coming out of the maintainers that I'd rather spoil them with whatever method makes them comfortable!

[Kris Maglione]

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:21:11AM -0700, Jason Yeo wrote:
>Are there any plans to use github instead of google code?

No.

--
Kris Maglione

Insane people are always sure that they are fine. It is only the sane
people who are willing to admit that they are crazy.
--Nora Ephron

[Ted Pavlic]

On Sep 3, 2012 1:11 PM, "Kris Maglione" <magli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:21:11AM -0700, Jason Yeo wrote:
>> Are there any plans to use github instead of google code?
> No.

+1 (for Kris's response)