Issue 51 in pencil-code: ionization module is incompatible with pencil check

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Status: Accepted
Owner: tobias.heinemann
CC: ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl, AxelBrandenburg
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High

New issue 51 by ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl: ionization module is
incompatible with pencil check
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=51

The pencil consistency check provides about the only security that a
simulation is set up properly. However, the test fails both for
most-modules and for 1d-tests/solar-atmosphere.

Both these samples use eos_ionization for equation of state.

The problem is that every time df is calculated with a new combination of
pencils, the results change, no matter which pencils have been flipped.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Comment #1 on issue 51 by tobias.heinemann: ionization module is

incompatible with pencil check
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=51

This is about the _random_ pencil check, yes?

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Comment #2 on issue 51 by ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl: ionization module is

incompatible with pencil check
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=51

Yes, it seems so. I think it is perfectly acceptable that some tests do not
like to
get random numbers in their pencils. So maybe this bug is resolved?

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #3 on issue 51 by tobias.heinemann: ionization module is

incompatible with pencil check
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=51

Yes, I would also think that this is acceptable. Marking this bug as fixed.