Re: Issue 47 in pencil-code: no-modules and gfortran

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Comment #1 on issue 47 by ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl: no-modules and gfortran
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=47

I have similar experiences.

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Owner: ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl

Comment #2 on issue 47 by wdobler: no-modules and gfortran
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=47

Which version(s) of gfortran?

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Comment #3 on issue 47 by ajo...@strw.leidenuniv.nl: no-modules and gfortran
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=47

First of all let me congratulate myself on Comment 1 above where I reply to
my own bug report (I thought it was Wolfgang's).

Secondly I have not seen the error message for some time now, which means
that gfortran probably solved the problem in the mean time.

[penci...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Cc: wdobler

Comment #4 on issue 47 by and...@astro.lu.se: no-modules and gfortran
http://code.google.com/p/pencil-code/issues/detail?id=47

Now this problem has returned, in the form of the
variable 'timestep_scaling' which is of size mvar. If mvar is zero, as in
pure particle runs, then param2.nml contains just 'timestep_scaling=',
which gives problems with IDL when I read in the data. My compiler is

pc392:~> mpif90 --version
GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Is there a way to get nl2idl to read lines like 'XXX=' and assume the value
to be zero?