AI for IA: amplifying thinking tools

[Howard Rheingold]

https://www.patreon.com/posts/ai-for-ia-large-118120516

Howard Rheingold 
https://patreon.com/howardrheingold
what it is ---> is --->up to us

[Roland Legrand]

Great! I'll read it tomorrow. Hectic family-festivities now. Wishing you all a nice end of the year and new beginnings! 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Peeragogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to peeragogy+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/peeragogy/1808B8BF-2426-47F7-B7A1-6556A1B9785F%40gmail.com.

[Roland Legrand]

Started reading anyway :) There is a clear tension between the idea that LLMs 'augment' human intelligence as merely  'tools', and the emerging development of AI as 'agents', being perfectly able to demonstrate their very own creativity (e.g. the Go-mastership of AlphaGo). I think we'll be able to formulate, as humans, general objectives, and then collaborate with AI-models whereby those models will be able to take their own initiatives and offer creative contributions, using not only statistical pattern recognition but combining this with 'reasoning'. 

Maybe we should think about LLMs as complex systems with distributed agency, blending human and non-human elements. They are ecosystems of humans, data, infrastructure and algorithms. All interconnected. The ability to act is hereby not exclusive to humans and the distinction between "tool" and "agent" is increasingly problematic. 

[Graziano Maino - www.pares.it]

Hi to everyone :-)

Thanks for this open dialogue.

I am trying to observe how we use AI in groups of colleagues and with clients (let's say in a social professional context).

With colleagues, it is a tool to bring new inputs into collaboration.

With clients, it is frequently a quite embarrassing topic, mainly divided between being for or against it, rather than a field of deep confrontation and common research.

Graziano 👋🏻 ⛲ 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/peeragogy/7bc36e43-46c0-4ec3-9f79-b77269264ee0n%40googlegroups.com.

[Contact Mr. Danoff's Teaching Laboratory]

Howdy, Peeragogues!

I second what Graziano wrote "Thanks for this open dialogue."

And I echo Roland's "Wishing you all a nice end of the year and new beginnings!"

Thank you for the link to your post, Howard! I will ponder the tl;dr and try to read all of it in the coming days =]

- Charlie

[Charles Blass]

brief drive-by to share this timely & topical survey from tom atlee of the multiplicity of intelligences 'in the mix' in engaging with "AI"

Working with AI and all forms of co-intelligence

https://open.substack.com/pub/tomatlee493488/p/working-with-ai-and-all-forms-of

warm seasonal shift greetings! cb

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Peeragogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to peeragogy+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/peeragogy/CAOnKKhxtgXepQ4jLhm3r7RdF2t5DuHXRY4ZTKF9qKXTLDR71%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Kathy E. Gill]

Thanks for this, Howard. 

I’m behind. HNY everyone!  

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Peeragogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to peeragogy+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/peeragogy/1808B8BF-2426-47F7-B7A1-6556A1B9785F%40gmail.com.