Project Action Review for 1st of September 2025
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Joe Corneli
Sep 1, 2025, 9:39:04 AMSep 1
to Peeragogy, Maria Cristina Bandeira Viseu, Tedeschi, Prof. Mary Carol, Raymond Puzio, Charles Danoff, Sridevi Ayloo
**1. Review the intention: what did we expect to learn or make together?**
Usual Monday meeting, but at a time when we can review a paper and think about where to go after?
**2. Establish what is happening: what and how are we learning?**
Ray suggested looking at the big picture, which we then did.
**3. What are some different perspectives on what’s happening?**
Cris askd some great questions about Joe’s ORB, agents for helping writing papers, doing a class with Joe’s existing group of people interested in open research, possibly designed with some ideas from our PLoP workshops, and considering some non-PLoP venues for publishing open research.
**4. What did we learn or change?**
We’re bringing some attention to what we’re going to put our attention
on. We might have some good ideas about this but we haven’t given
voice to that. And, since we’ve pretty much finished our recent set
of papers, there’s more time to give to this.
**5. What else should we change going forward?**
- Joe: quick demo of OR book.
- Joe@Otter: For the price of 1 movie => how much transcription can we do?
- Sri: Register for PLoP
- Ray has downloaded the VP - Expert system and we should have a play with it!
- Charlie: follow up with Serge about the Overleaf
- Request to focus on editing the patterns in the Wikibook version
- Return to the mini-book idea, so we could publish in a Zine
Usual Monday meeting, but at a time when we can review a paper and think about where to go after?
**2. Establish what is happening: what and how are we learning?**
Ray suggested looking at the big picture, which we then did.
**3. What are some different perspectives on what’s happening?**
Cris askd some great questions about Joe’s ORB, agents for helping writing papers, doing a class with Joe’s existing group of people interested in open research, possibly designed with some ideas from our PLoP workshops, and considering some non-PLoP venues for publishing open research.
**4. What did we learn or change?**
We’re bringing some attention to what we’re going to put our attention
on. We might have some good ideas about this but we haven’t given
voice to that. And, since we’ve pretty much finished our recent set
of papers, there’s more time to give to this.
**5. What else should we change going forward?**
- Joe: quick demo of OR book.
- Joe@Otter: For the price of 1 movie => how much transcription can we do?
- Sri: Register for PLoP
- Ray has downloaded the VP - Expert system and we should have a play with it!
- Charlie: follow up with Serge about the Overleaf
- Request to focus on editing the patterns in the Wikibook version
- Return to the mini-book idea, so we could publish in a Zine
Joe Corneli
Sep 1, 2025, 10:06:25 AMSep 1
to Tedeschi, Prof. Mary Carol, Peeragogy, Maria Cristina Bandeira Viseu, Raymond Puzio, Charles Danoff, Sridevi Ayloo
Thanks for correcting the attribution of that! I was looking at the chat notes very quickly while also typing. And concretely, I'm hoping to be able to register!
On Mon, 1 Sept 2025 at 14:53, Tedeschi, Prof. Mary Carol <mted...@pace.edu> wrote:
I said please register for Plop
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Joe Corneli <holtze...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 9:38:47 AM
To: Peeragogy <peer...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Maria Cristina Bandeira Viseu <cristin...@gmail.com>; Tedeschi, Prof. Mary Carol <mted...@pace.edu>; Raymond Puzio <rsp...@gmail.com>; Charles Danoff <danoff....@gmail.com>; Sridevi Ayloo <SAy...@citytech.cuny.edu>
Subject: Project Action Review for 1st of September 2025
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages