Sir James Johnstone, d.18 Nov 1699; m.Margaret Bannatyne
1.Sir John, of Westerhall, cr Baronet [S] 1700, with remainder to heirs male forever, d.30 Sep 1711;
m.ca 1700 Rachel Johnstone; he may have m.2nd Agnes, dau of Sir John Dalzell, 2nd Bt.
2.Sir William, 2nd Bt., d.8 Oct 1727; m. before Mar 1701 Henrietta Johnstone
2.1.Sir James, 3rd Bt. (9 Feb 1697-10 Dec 1772); m.Jun 1719 Hon. Barbara Murray (d.15 Mar 1773), dau of 4th Lord Elibank --> the Westerhall baronetcy is still among his descendants
2.2.John, k.a. Cartagena 1741; m.Charlotte Van Lore, Dowager Marchioness of Annandale, dau and heiress of John Vanden-Bempdé, of Hackness;
this is the John, 2nd son of 2nd Bt of Westerhall cited by Debretts's2.2.1.Sir Richard, 1793 VANDEN-BEMPDE, 1795 VANDEN-BEMPDE-JOHNSTONE, cr Baronet 1795, with remainder failing his own issue male to his brother and his (21 Sep 1732-Jul 1807); m.1st Nov 1756 Catherine Agnew (dsp 1790); m.2nd 26 Feb 1795 Margaret Scott (d.7 Dec 1853) --> issue, including the Lords Derwent
2.2.2.Charles John (15 Jul 1736-8 May 1805); m.1778 Mary Beddoe (d.1809) --> issue in remainder to both Baronetcies
On Monday, April 27, 2026 at 6:25:24 PM UTC-5 Paul Theroff wrote:
It says the same thing in 2012 Debrett's, but it's wrong. It says "Descendants of late Col John Johnstone, 2nd son of 2nd Baronet of Westerhall", but they mean "Descendants of late Col John Johnstone, 2nd son of 2nd Baronet of Hackness".
I think they got confused because the entire Hackness line descends from John Johnstone, 2nd son of the 2nd Bt of Westerhall.