The Times heads the announcement differently (& oddly): LORD S. E. SEYMOUR AND MISS P. A. WILCOX…
Lord SEYMOUR b 1982 elder son & ha of the 19th Duke of SOMERSET b 1952 and Judith-Rose b 1952 reg Q2 London d of John Folliott HULL by his 1951 m reg Q3 London to Rosemarie K WARING [b 1926 reg Q4 Avon]. He m 1st 2006 (div 2014) Arlette Marie Leotine d of Daniel LAFAYEEDNEY of Kildinny Farm, Forteviot, Perth (no issue).
Poppy Alexandra b 1990 reg Q3 London d of John A WILCOX by his 1988 m reg Q2 W.Sussex to Gillian J SAGGERS b c1954 reg Q1 Surrey.
As I'm sure is well known to most fellow posters, Somerset is unique
among dukedoms in having a barony as its only subsidiary title, although the duke's ha ranks immediately after all substantive marquesses and before all earls in the official table of precedence.
Any issue of this marriage born during the 19th
Duke’s lifetime will use the style of 'Hon' before their name, as children of a
baron by courtesy . Similar to what happened during the present duke’s time as
Lord Seymour, when his (then) only child was styled Hon Sebastian Seymour.