Scarbrough/Boyson engagement

[Michael Rhodes]

The engagement was announced in March, 2007, between Richard Aldred
Lumley, 12th Earl of Scarbrough (b. 1973), eldest son of the late 11th
Earl of Scarbrough, of Sandbeck Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, by
his wife the former Lady Elizabeth Ramsay, scion of the Earls of
Dalhousie, & Mrs Henrietta Scherman, former wife of a Mr. ---
Scherman, and daughter of _____Boyson.

Michael Rhodes (please delete the x to e-mail me)
======================================

[Michael Rhodes]

CORRECTION: The earl is Richard Osbert. His father was Aldred.....

On 8 Mar, 11:50, "Michael Rhodes" <migx73allenford2...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

[Michael Rhodes]

I made so many misakes in my previous post ----here's a further
update....

The engagement was announced in March, 2007, between Richard Osbert
Lumley, 13th Earl of Scarbrough (b. 1973), eldest son of the late 12th

Earl of Scarbrough, of Sandbeck Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, by
his wife the former Lady Elizabeth Ramsay, scion of the Earls of

Dalhousie, & Mrs Henrietta Scherman, daughter of _____Boyson. The
bride-to-be married firstly, in London, Aug 1986, Marc L. Scherman.

Michael Rhodes (please delete the x to e-mail me)

=======================================

[marquess]

Michael how old is the bride to be? If she married firstly in 1986?
Not much chance for an heir there then is there? Wasn't there a post
about the brother of the earl being engaged or married?

On 8 Mar, 10:59, "Michael Rhodes" <migx73allenford2...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

[Michael Rhodes]

She has to be a gooddecade older than her intended - but I have no
DOB.

[marquess]

That probably makes the brother born in 1980 the ultimate heir! Let's
hope that he doesn't marry some ten year older than himself, mid 40's
it is still possible, but slim.

On 19 Mar, 01:16, "Michael Rhodes" <migx73allenford2...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

[Shinjinee]

And, if I suspect correctly, isn't the brother the sole heir to the
title, or are there some heirs hiding in collateral branches (the 9th
Earl was himself from a collateral branch IIRC). Not good, not
good.... from the point of the title surviving.

Shinjinee

[marquess]

There is no one hiding in the collaterals, the brother born in 1980 is
the only salvation for the peerage, unless the earl marries divorces
and comes to his senses and marries a woman younger than him, rather
than one who is ten years old. God forbid that the Earl of Pembroke
should do the same thing, though he has expressed a desire to have to
children!

[bx...@yahoo.com]

At least the Earl of Pembroke has an heir-- although it is the Earl of
Carnarvon.
However, it would be a shame to see the Pembroke and Montgomery
earldoms be "swallowed" (for lack of a better term) by another
Earl.

However, the Earldoms of Shaftesbury and Norbury will disappear
altogether if they marry women much older than themselves and no sons
are produced.

Brooke
bx...@yahoo.com

> > Shinjinee- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -