I agree that the LEINSTER dukedom bears watching, however, as you say it has a few things in its favour:
- the hp, Edward, is still young and has recently had daus.
-
the line of collaterals is probably not updated. The heir born 1953 is
one of 4 grandchildren of the late Rupert Augustus FitzGerald (1900 -
1969) listed. These grandchildren were all born 1951 and 1962.
However, none are shown as married or with any issue. It is definitely
believable that one or even two of these has never married, but all of
them? I doubt it. This branch appear to be resident in Victoria,
Australia, which makes searching tricky as you cannot search very recent
BMD records. You can search probate records, but FitzGerald is a
common name, meaning that even though there are matches on both heirs,
it is difficult to be sure they are for the "correct person".
NB these probate records are:
Peter Charles FitzGerald [b 1925] - died 02/08/1999
This might be correct (and realistically we should be on the look out for a death record given his age), however,
this notice was placed by "Maggy" and his wife is recorded in Debrett's as June.
Stephen Peter FitzGerald [b 1953] - died 22/12/2004. See
this notice, but he would have been only 51.
Victoria
death records can be searched 30 years after the event, so we can check
the first of these deaths in about 5 years time.