On 2 Dec, 23:48, marquess <
marquessmarqu...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Agreed a very dicey dukedom, though that is not as old as some of the
> other peerages that it covers up. There was a recent case where
> someone was claiming the dukedom, as the rightful heir, but it all
> collapsed. Still the real tragedy here is the death of the Earl of
> Offlay, I once read a book back in 88 which had a 75 pic of four
> generations of heir males to the dukedom. The old duke previous to the
> one now, the current duke, his son, and his son the late earl. Shame,
> there aren't even any collaterals in remainder to the other peerages
> so, we could be witnessing the end of a great ancient Irish family.
> For all we know the son of lord John, could want to "marry" a man!?
It would have been the late 7th Duke (d. 1976), the late 8th Duke (d.
2004), the current (9th) Duke and the current Duke's son. (Had Lord
Offaly survived he would now be Marquess of Kildare.)
Are we sure there are no heirs to the older peerages? The Earldom of
Kildare goes back to the 14th century - there must be some distant
relatives somewhere, surely?
And, for the record, their surname is "FitzGerald", not
"Fitzgerald". ;-)