On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 8:28:45 AM UTC+10 William H.S. Leeson wrote:
Fair point. Granted, we live in very different times; I'm simply resigned these days to being an anachronistic 21st-Century heretic. I'm not here to pick a fight--I'm simply tired of standing alone against the tides of popular sentiment, and the logical left half of my brain is simply exhausted from having to compute and reconcile the endless inconsistencies--so, from now on, if someone says that the house on the British throne is the House of Mountbatten-Windsor, I'll just smile, nod, and say "Yes, absolutely!"--just don't follow up and ask if I actually believe it.
With respect, one small correction to what you wrote: Queen Mary was not the widow of the founder of the House of Windsor; she was the widow of the King who changed his family's name to Windsor from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in order to appease then-prevalent anti-German sentiment in 1917. (Though, by today's logic, the family name should have been "Saxe-Coburg and Gotha-Hanover, surely???)
All I'm saying is that, due to intrigue from decades ago, the late Prince Philip and his family got shafted by those who, for whatever reason, didn't want to see the Mountbattens eventually on the throne. (And seeing as how the Mountbattens are now the third family of Germanic origin to occupy the British throne, I really fail to see how this is somehow a novel thing or a threat to anything at all--guess I had to be there at the time.) It was the late Queen's will and pleasure that her offspring be known by the name of Mountbatten-Windsor (which was respected for the duration of her long life), but that still must have been a real slap in the face for Philip, knowing that his children would bear his wife's surname over his own (hence why I suggested "Windsor-Mountbatten" as a compromise--if a double-barrelled name it has to be, at least then Mountbatten would be in the dominant position, as is the case for the last name in a double- or more barrelled name).
While I expect Charles III (and not George VII--I was wrong on that one) will clarify the issue at some point, I merely hope that the Mountbattens get the recognition that is due to them--after all, they made it to the throne fair and square.