Edward,Viscount Lascelles (1796-1839)

165 views
Skip to first unread message

dpth...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 8, 2020, 8:17:17 AM6/8/20
to Peerage News
There is a mystery about the marriages of Edward Lascelles, Viscount Lascelles (13 Jul 1796-17 Dec 1839).

According to Burke’s since at least 1959 he made the following marriages: m.1st 3 Nov 1818 Ann Elizabeth Rosser (d.19 Aug 1831); m.2nd 10 Sep 1831 Philippine Munster, said to be widow of a Baron Testa.

However, according to The Complete Peerage, Lodge's Peerage 1861 and Burke’s 1921, he married once, in 1821, to a completely different woman, Louisa Rowley.

In the 1831 Debrett's he is listed as unmarried.

Can anyone shed any light on this?

dpth...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 8, 2020, 8:30:43 AM6/8/20
to Peerage News
Burke's as early as 1832 had him married to Louisa Rowley.


Another oddity: 

Gentleman's Magazine in its 1841 obituary for the 2nd Earl, said:

"His Lordship married, Sept. 3, 1794, Henrietta, eldest daughter of the late Sir John Saunders Sebright, Bart, and by that lady, who survives bim, be had issue seven sons and four daughters: 1. tbe Right Hon. Edward now Earl of Harewood, born in 1796...."

meaning that they thought that Viscount Lascelles, who had died in 1839, was still living!

dpth...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 8, 2020, 11:39:36 AM6/8/20
to Peerage News
A reader of this group has sent me the following very interesting information:

1. He located "the marriage of Edward Lascelles and Ann Elizabeth Rosser at St James's church, Bristol on 3 November 1818 - the marriage was by licence, and both parties signed the register - he was described as "Edward Lascelles of Westbury upon Trim, Esquire, bachelor"; she was a spinster of Bristol.  The witnesses were Ann and William Lodge."


2. In "...his probate record in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury from 1844 ... he is styled His Highborn Count Edward Von Lascelles, but indexed as The Honourable Edward Lascelles commonly called Viscount Lascelles -- this records a deed between "the Count" and his wife, born Baroness Phillippine von Lutgendorff, dated at Wurzburg, 2 May 1838. This was essentially a post-marital contract, registered with the Bavarian courts and then used to obtain English probate."


3. A 2010 book, "A Swindler's Progress: Nobles and Convicts in the Age of Liberty" by Kirsten McKenzie, contains much detail about the Viscount and his chequered marital history. The first marriage (Ann Elizabeth Rosser, 1818) was to a barge-owner cum publican's daughter and was certainly not welcomed by the Lascelles family. It seems Edward was sent off to the Continent and lived there in quiet retirement - he was given a place at the embassy in Vienna, where he met Phillipine Testa (sic) "a twice widowed Bavarian baroness" who became at first his mistress. After Ann Elizabeth died at the age of 38, they were free to marry (her second husband had died in 1814). The author suggests that "Louisa Rowley" never existed, and that the 1821 marriage was invented by the Lascelles family as a cover for the real story."

So it seems that the marriage with Louisa Rowley, even if she existed and it ever occurred, was probably illegal. I wonder whether it was because of his checkered career that Gentleman's Magazine in 1841 didn't even know that he was dead.

dpth...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 8, 2020, 11:47:19 AM6/8/20
to Peerage News
I should add that the reader who compiled this information was Michael Andrews-Reading.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages