we hear oi another illegit. s. of his (by yet another woman, named Salkeld), one Richard Annesley, who claimed the title in 1770. The London Evening Post, 4 Apr. 1722, states this Richard to be the legit, s. of Earl Richard " by Anne, 2nd da. of William Salkeld, of the city of London, Merchant. " (The date of 1 742 is attri- buted to this marriage in a ped. of Jackson — the name of Anne Salkeld's mother — in Morehouse's History of Kirkburton, co. York, p. 172. See ISS . & Q., 7th Series, vol. ii, p. 16.) The possibility of such a marriage is doubtful, as the Earl's 1st marriage (or marriages) was (or were) in 17 15, soon after he was of age, and the subsequent marriage (the 1st of the two marriages with Juliana, who survived him) was within a month of the death of one of these wives, probably the 1st and lawful wife. See N. is" Q., and Series, vol. x, pp. 27 and 156, as also several notices in 2nd Series, vol. xi. "
....
The title of Anglesey, however, was (in accordance with the
English decision of 1771, whereby it was held to have been extinet in 1761)
made use of again, as a Peerage title, some thirty years before such extinct-
ion of issue had occurred.