The Viscountcy of Frendraught | ||||||
| The following article, which appeared in the "Aberdeen Journal" on 1 June 1901, discusses a | ||||||
| possible claim to be made for this peerage. Given that the claim appears to have had no merit | ||||||
| whatsoever, it is not surprising that the claim does not appear to have been prosecuted. | ||||||
| "There is a rumour that the new Laird of Lathrisk, Lieutenant Maitland-Makgill-Crichton, | ||||||
| purposes claiming the title of Viscount of Frendraught, which, it is said, has been in abeyance | ||||||
| since 1690. It may be interesting to readers both in Fifeshire and the north to learn something | ||||||
| about the Viscounts of Frendraught, and the relation of the claimant to the Crichtons of other | ||||||
| days. The Laird of Lathrisk is lineally descended from William Crichton, the famous Lord High | ||||||
| Chancellor of Scotland, during the reigns of James I and James II, who was created Lord Crichton | ||||||
| in 1445. James Crichton, son of the Chancellor, obtained the barony of Frendraught through his | ||||||
| marriage in 1430 with Lady Janet Dunbar, eldest daughter of the Earl of Moray, and founded the | ||||||
| family of Crichton of Frendraught. William Crichton, son of this marriage, became third Lord | ||||||
| Crichton on the death of his father in 1469 [c 1455?]; but as he joined with his two brothers in | ||||||
| the Duke of Albany's rebellion against James III he forfeited his title as Baron Crichton and the | ||||||
| estates of his brothers were confiscated. As the third Lord Crichton was married to a sister of | ||||||
| the King, the Royal clemency was extended to him, so that the estate of Frendraught remained | ||||||
| to his posterity. But the title of Lord Crichton has since remained extinct. | ||||||
| 'The next member of the family who came into prominence was James Crichton of Frendraught, | ||||||
| fifth in descent from the last Baron Crichton. His father made over the family estate to him while | ||||||
| he was alive - a precaution frequently taken in unsettled times - and James Crichton was married | ||||||
| in February, 1619, to Lady Elizabeth Gordon, daughter of John, twelfth Earl of Sutherland, then | ||||||
| one of the most powerful noblemen in the north of Scotland. He was acknowledged as the heir | ||||||
| male of Lord Crichton, and his eldest son, James Crichton of Frendraught, was advanced to the | ||||||
| peerage during the father's lifetime, with the title of Viscount Frendraught, with limitation to "his | ||||||
| heirs male and successors." The patent of nobility is dated 29th August, 1642. Lord Frendraught | ||||||
| took a leading part with the Marquess of Montrose in his last expedition. He was with him on the | ||||||
| fatal field of Invercarron, when [Archibald] Strachan prevailed over "the Great Marquess" in | ||||||
| 1650. It is related that during the battle, when the horse of Montrose was shot under him, | ||||||
| Frendraught dismounted and insisted that his leader should take his charger, and flee from the | ||||||
| field. With the aid thus generously offered Montrose made his escape, though he was afterwards | ||||||
| treacherously captured. Frendraught was made prisoner and carried off to Edinburgh. The story | ||||||
| has long been current that the Viscount took the defeat of Montrose so much to heart that he | ||||||
| starved himself to death in Edinburgh Castle; but there seems to be no truth in this tale, as | ||||||
| Frendraught was certainly at the "true funerals" of Montrose in 1661, eleven years after his | ||||||
| supposed death. He was twice married. By his first wife, Lady Margaret Leslie, daughter of the | ||||||
| Earl of Leven, he had one daughter, Janet, who was married in 1665 to Sir James Makgill of | ||||||
| Rankeillour, and was the ancestress of the present laird of Lathrisk. To her story we shall return. | ||||||
| Meanwhile it is necessary to trace the male line of Frendraught. The second wife of the viscount | ||||||
| was Marion, daughter of Sir Alexander Irvine of Drum, whom he married in 1642, and by whom he | ||||||
| had two sons. The elder son, James, became second viscount. He had one son, William, third | ||||||
| viscount, who died, unmarried, in his minority, when the title fell to his uncle Lewis, fourth | ||||||
| viscount. Lewis was a confirmed Jacobite, and accompanied James II to France when that | ||||||
| monarch abdicated. He was attainted by Parliament in July, 1690, and was present with James II | ||||||
| in Ireland. He died without children in November, 1698, and as he was under ban as a traitor the | ||||||
| title became extinct, and even though he had legitimate progeny they could not have succeeded. | ||||||
| "Return now to Janet Crichton, daughter of the first viscount and wife of Sir James Makgill. She | ||||||
| had one son, David Makgill of Rankeillour, whose daughter, Isabella Makgill, married the Rev. | ||||||
| William Dick, minister of Cupar. Margaret Dick, granddaughter and heiress of this minister, was | ||||||
| married to the Hon. Frederick Maitland, sixth son of the Earl of Lauderdale, who assumed the | ||||||
| additional name of Makgill. The eldest son of this marriage, Charles Maitland-Makgill of | ||||||
| Rankeillour, was married in August, 1794, to Mary, daughter of David Johnstone of Lathrisk. | ||||||
| Their eldest son, David Maitland Makgill Crichton of Rankeillour, was born in 1801, and succeeded | ||||||
| his grandmother in 1827. He was served "heir of line" of the first Viscount Frendraught on his | ||||||
| application in June, 1839. He survived till 1851, and his grandson (the son of his son) is the | ||||||
| present lieutenant. David Maitland-Makgill-Crichton succeeded to the estate of Lathrisk in | ||||||
| January last. It is said that he now claims the title of Viscount Frendraught. | ||||||
| "In examining this claim, it is necessary first to notice that there is no such title as Viscount | ||||||
| Frendraught in existence. The fourth viscount was the legitimate holder of the title, and it was | ||||||
| attainted in his person. Even if it had not been so, the title appears to have been confined to | ||||||
| "heirs male," and the Makgill branch could only claim through an heir-female, viz. Janet Crichton. | ||||||
| At least, this point should be cleared up by reference to the original patent, for, unless it confers | ||||||
| the succession to the title on "heirs whatsoever" - a very unusual circumstance - there can be | ||||||
| absolutely no claim to the title, even were it in existence. These matters must all have been | ||||||
| carefully considered in 1839, when David Maitland-Makgill-Crichton was retoured [i.e. confirmed | ||||||
| as an heir] as "heir general" of the first viscount; and had the claim to the title been well founded | ||||||
| it would have unquestionably been preferred at that time. Unless some new documents have | ||||||
| been found bearing upon the destination of the title, the claim could have no effect now. And | ||||||
| even though it had, there would have to be a petition presented to the King, asking him to | ||||||
| restore the forfeited title, which has not been in abeyance, but actually extinct since 1690. It | ||||||
| is quite possible that the late Mr Johnstone of Lathrisk may have discovered some documentary | ||||||
| evidence unknown in 1839; and, in any case, it will be extremely interesting to watch the | ||||||
| progress of this peerage claim, if claim there be." | ||||||