I may incur the wrath of the traditionalists - or the entire group - but I'll roll the dice and see how it goes. I've reached the point where my forward hatch is now dragging down the rest of the boat. I need to fix or... replace.
Early Wanderer, otherwise pretty much stock parts.
I've painted the entire hull, cored and painted the deck, replaced the running rigging, patched up the sails, added new stack pack and UV genoa cover to match the new paint, restored the teak, replaced the portlights tracked down the kids and grandkids of the original owner, and established a pension for the workers who build my Pearson ... (OK, I made that last one up)... but now that all that is done, the original hatch is looking pretty horrid, and holding back the other good work that has been done. I need an upgrade or restoration.
Have seen the Good Old Boat hatch rebuild, interesting but maybe not for me. Am slightly intrigued by cutting a square out of the existing one and replacing with Lexan or ... whatever. Just not sure about that presentation.
I don't see any other ideas from the archived posts here. Are there any suggestions or other sources anyone might suggest?
I like the existing cut-out size and that the cap-like top gives me just enough headroom to stand upright in that space. Therefore I'm slightly partial to something similar to the existing design.
Thoughts?
Thanks to all,
MD
I’ve seen Wanderers with the original hatch planked over in teak. But what’s wrong with the original? The low profile will not catch you jib sheets. Anything more will (even the original does occasionally). Installing a solar ventilator is another idea but they are too noisy to sleep under. Nick
From: pearson_...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:pearson_...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of domagami
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009
9:42 PM
To: pearson_...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pearson_sailboats]
Forward hatch fix/replacement
I'm a traditionalist from way back. That means by all means, if the hatch is
like the Triton, remove it and fabricate a real traditional hatch out of
either teak or mahogany. Get some pictures of some mid 20th century wood
boats and pick a hatch you like.
Dick Usen
I think Dick has the right idea, build yourself a nice traditional hatch.
Guy
Sorry, I never explained what was so "horrid" about it.
It is solid as a hatch, so I have good bones to work with, but the flat horizontal bit looks just awful. Maybe at one point this was a sort of smoked and/or translucent window? But today it's a dirty green, scratched, crackled, essentially opaque, mess.
I like the added light that comes in through, so I don't want to go full teak, or even too much with strapping or too many other bands. (And yes, I think I can avoid the solar fan too)
So far what I'm hearing is use the original, treat it like a frame, replace the (formerly) transparent bit and maybe trim in teak. Guess I'll go surfing for some photos to steal ideas.
Oh, and not catch the jib sheets??? Are you kidding? Snags them about 50% of the time. I wish I knew the trick to avoid this.
Thanks for the replies!
MD
Sounds like we're looking at a design contest! Actually, if you keep the
slack out of the lazy sheet, it shouldn't snag too often.
Dick Usen
This is how I stopped the sheets from catching under the front hatch on our 10M Puffin.
http://dan.pfeiffer.net/10m/006_forward_hatch_eyebrow.htm
Guy
How do you guys catch the sheets? Do you sail with the hatch open?
The solution for jib sheets catching on a Wanderer forward hatch is to put a teak or stainless handrail to each side of the hatch. I’ve seen pictures of this in teak on Pete’s old Wanderer. I think the stainless handrails have an even better curved shape to keep the sheets off the hatch. As far as the hatch itself is concerned, mine has a decent translucent “amber” finish which I like. Maybe the appearance of your could be improved if you prepped and varnished it, maybe even stain it to get a better color. Nick
From: pearson_...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:pearson_...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Guy Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009
1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch fix/replacement [1 Attachment]This how I stopped the sheets catching on the forward hatch of my P35. Now I have to figure out how to keep the sheets from catcing on the dinghy. Actually, it's not a problem.Aloha
Peter Ogilvie
Pa'akai O'o, Pearson 35 #108
Too many Landrovers, some even run.
From: Jeff Griglack <grig...@gmail.com>Sent: Fri, November 20, 2009 4:20:51 PM
Subject: Re: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch fix/replacement
The space between the hatch and the cabinhouse is just the right gap for the sheet to catch in.
The major reason I made the eyebrow was to break the force of green water rushing up the front of the cabinhouse and forcing it's way past the gasket.
Attachment(s) from Peter Ogilvie
1 of 1 Photo(s)
A PO replaced the front hatch on my boat. The hatch I have has an aluminum frame and a piece of Lexan/Plexiglass that fits into it and makes up the entire opening portion of the hatch. There is nothing to catch the sheet (as long as I don't sail with it open). Any water coming over the deck hits the metal frame. I don't know what brand it is because I can't find any markings on it.
The 10M's hatch is moulded as part of the cabinhouse, it has the advantage of a wide snag free opening at the cost of catching sheets and shipping green water. It's the green water part that bugs me the most, the design directs and captures the force of the water againts the foam tape used to seal the hatch.
The teak eyebrow was easy to make and totaly solved the problem.
Steve
P30 #840
Dick Usen
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of SteveA
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:18 PM
To: pearson-boats
Subject: [pearson ] Re: Fwd: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch
fix/replacement
http://www.pompanette.com/pompweb.nsf/731d6514ff5a8481852567be000745b2/6cc9c
9dafb5c190f852567bc0004e54b?OpenDocument
http://www.pompanette.com/pompweb.nsf/731d6514ff5a8481852567be000745b2/a594d
67364fe8439852567c5000f8a35?OpenDocument
Steve
P30 #840
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pearson-boats" group. To post to this group, send email to
pearso...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
to pearson-boat...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pearson-boats?hl=en.
The threads in the hold open arm are gone
I’ll have a friend tap it out to the next size and get a knurled knob
out of McMaster Carr or somewhere.
And now I know the gasket size.
So I figure for a $10-20 I can have a working hatch
It is otherwise in good condition
(the scratches don’t bother me)
:)
Dick Usen
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of SteveA
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:09 AM
To: pearson-boats
Subject: [pearson ] Re: Fwd: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch
fix/replacement
--
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Pfeiffer
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:38 AM
To: pearso...@googlegroups.com
Wow, I had never heard of the Helicoil and it sounds terrific. Of course now that I’ve started to research it I found that it’s a bit too expensive for the occasional stripped thread. Also, what is the minimum depth it needs to be useful? I’m guessing it wouldn’t be helpful for stripped holes in an aluminum spar.
Martin Rosenberg
Wow, I had never heard of the Helicoil and it sounds terrific. Of course now that I’ve started to research it I found that it’s a bit too expensive for the occasional stripped thread. Also, what is the minimum depth it needs to be useful? I’m guessing it wouldn’t be helpful for stripped holes in an aluminum spar.
Martin Rosenberg
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of richard usen
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 9:47 AM Subject: RE: [pearson ] Re: Fwd: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch fix/replacement
My guess is that the Helicoil will hold nicely in the Aluminum and prevent any more wear of the female threads between the steel bolt and aluminum. I hate to have oversize threads in small parts, especially w/ round parts.
Dick Usen
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Pfeiffer
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:38 AM
To: pearso...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [pearson ] Re: Fwd: [pearson_sailboats] Re: Forward hatch fix/replacement
What about the disimilar metal/galvanic corrosion issue in the aluminum hatch frame? I don't think you would bed a helicoil in tef-gel (though I suppose you could use locktite). Seems like tapping for a larger fastener might be a good way to go if there is adequate room. You have to over-drill and tap for the helicoil anyway..
http://www.restockit.com/Thread-Repair-Kit-1-2-13-(HEL5521-8).html?source=froogle&utm_source=googlebase&utm_medium=comparsionshopping&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=HEL5521-8
----- Original Message -----From: Peter KaferSent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 8:42 AMSubject: [pearson ] TransducerI am going to install a new depth sounder on our P323. I'd be interested in where everyone has located the transducer in their boat. I saw on the Pearson 323 site that Richard Rollins on Libations Too had installed his transducer under the salon starboard sette.
Thanks
Peter
P323 Now or Never!
Fact does not require fiction for balance.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a narrow (3") space between the forward water tank and the
bulkhead immediately aft of it; the water from the tank drains to port
of center, and just to starboard of center I located my transducer.
The transducer is actually mounted in a faring that is contoured to
the hull. It created another hole in my hull (which needed to be re-
sealed last Spring), but the location works well and gives me a clean
image of the water immediately below the bow. The original (?)
transducer was located under the nav station, which was certainly more
accessible than the present spot, but it was shadowed by the keel and
seemed less than ideal. An alternative spot would have been under the
port-side locker below the V-berth. This would have been a bit more
accessible, but slightly more off-center.
Good luck.
Steve Hayes
P323 #63
Readfield & Rockland, Maine
My advice: pick a convenient spot and go for it. You'll probably be lucky.
It ain't rocket science in the real world.
Dick Usen
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Dan LeBlond
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 8:12 AM
To: pearso...@googlegroups.com
I'd also note that when it hits 25-30 knots, I can keep sailing along
at 6.5 knots when others have run for shelter.
-----Original Message-----
From: pearso...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pearso...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kafer
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 6:43 PM
To: pearso...@googlegroups.com
Back in the old days when I installed my first sounder the manufacturer (Seafarer - a british company) specified that the transducer be placed at the aft end of the first 1/3 of the waterline and as close to the centerline as possible and yet not close enough to the leading edge of the keel that the keel would/could be "seen" by the sounder. They explained that this was the optimum place as the water passing there would have shed any accumulation of air bubbles forced into the water by the bow and yet still be far enough forward to give some minimum warning of a forthcoming grounding.