2009.07.23: July 23, 2009: Headlines: Iraq: Figures: COS - Cameroon: Diplomacy: LA Times: Interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, Christopher Hill
Peace Corps Online
E-mail Notification
Peace Corps Online : Directory : Cameroon : RPCV Christopher R. Hill (Cameroon) : RPCV Christopher R. Hill: Newest Stories : 2009.07.23: July 23, 2009: Headlines: Iraq: Figures: COS - Cameroon: Diplomacy: LA Times: Interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, Christopher Hill| By Admin1 (admin) (98.188.147.225) on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 5:49 pm : Edit Post |
Interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, Christopher Hill
"I don't think you need to have necessarily 130,000 troops in a country to remind a
politician of the need to observe human rights and respect the rule of law. . . . A country like
Iraq that wants to join the international community and reverse several decades of recent history
understands that the price of admission into that international community is quite often respect for
international norms of human rights. I don't think it's necessarily for American diplomats
to sell some kind of American form of human rights, but rather to be helpful to the government, in
this case in Iraq, to be helpful in seeing if they can implement some international norms that will
make them an equal member of the international community. What you need there is not so much troops
as experience and a certain amount of patience, and certainly an understanding of how these issues
need to be addressed in the world." Cameroon RPCV Christopher R. Hill is presently US Ambassador
to Iraq and formerly served as assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and
U.S. ambassador to South Korea.
Interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, Christopher Hill
IRAQ: Interview with the U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad, Christopher Hill
Baghdad-hill The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Christopher Hill, sat down with the Los Angeles Times
three weeks ago. Below are excerpts from the interview, in which Hill discussed America's
changing role in Iraq and ability to influence the country now that U.S. forces are no longer in
charge of Iraq's security and scheduled to leave the country by the end of 2011. Hill also
talked about plans to scale down the U.S. Embassy there, the largest in the world. His remarks
provided some insight into how the American presence in Iraq will evolve over time and some context
to what issues are likely to be discussed during Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki's current
visit to the United States.
The Times asked Hill how the United States, with the footprint of its forces being drastically
reduced, would continue to promote progress on the key issues of reconciliation, developing the
economy, fighting corruption, mediating between Kurds and Arabs.
Hill: You've identified a number of key tasks especially in the area of reconciliation that are
not necessarily a military task. I would argue most of those are increasingly, if not in some cases
exclusively, civilian. I think what you are seeing in this crucial year, this the sixth year of our
presence here in Iraq, is the hand-over [from the U.S. military] not only to Iraqi security forces
but the hand-over to [American] civilian authorities who will be responsible for managing the
U.S.-Iraqi relationship not just for the coming years, but potentially for the coming decades. You
are sitting in one of the world's largest embassies, quite frankly. We too from the point of
view of the embassy, from the point of view of the various U.S. agencies that are represented here,
I think we are ready to manage this relationship [with Iraq]. . . . One of the things that needs to
happen is a stepping up of reconciliation efforts. To be sure, there will be people on the edges of
the spectrum of opinion, who are unreconcilable, not interested in joining the mainstream, [and] not
interested in joining the political process But I think there are still others where with effort can
be brought into the political process. This is by and large an Iraqi issue of Iraqis talking to
Iraqis, rather than Americans talking to Iraqis. It is nonetheless something we very much support
and will try to be helpful whenever we can.
The Times asked how the embassy would be able to help Iraq achieve reconciliation among its various
factions.
Hill: It's an issue where we have to be welcomed in the process. Any diplomat who has faced
these kinds of problems in any part of the world knows that you have to develop a reputation for
bringing value to a process. The example I would give of where I think foreign diplomacy, including
American diplomacy, could be helpful is on the so-called disputed internal boundaries issues, the
so-called DIBS. To be sure, the U.N. has taken the lead on this with the publication of the DIBS
report and the efforts to get the representatives of the Kurds and Baghdad but also the local
communities, [including] Sunni Arabs, together. I think you can look for the American Embassy to try
to play a helpful role in that process, as long as we are welcomed to do so, and we believe we are.
The Times asked how , in light of the withdrawal of American forces from cities, the U.S. Embassy
would be able to promote reconciliation with the Sunni Awakening movement and armed groups that had
stopped fighting the Iraqi government and the U.S. military since 2007.
Hill: I think the role of the United States is very much respected in this country. That doesn't
mean it is universally liked, but it is very much respected. Having been an American diplomat for 32
years, I have tended to or usually found a willingness on the part of political groups to listen to
what I or my colleagues have to offer. I don't think you have to be in the U.S. military to have
people listen to you, because I think they correctly understand that we are also representing the
United States. You ask what I assume to be an almost logistical question. Are we out there, are we
in touch with people? The U.S. civilian authorities here . . . have something called provincial
reconstruction teams [PRTs] which are located throughout the country. We have some 28 PRTs.
Obviously we will be looking at how we configure PRTs in light of the eventual drawdown of U.S.
troops, even outside of the cities and to determine how that will affect PRT operations. But
certainly in the meantime, we have an unprecedented number of U.S. diplomats who are out among the
people throughout the country. I don't think we'll have a problem reaching people. I think
the issue will be whether some of these rejectionist groups, who probably consider us part of the
problem in the first place, whether they will listen to a plea to join in the political process.
The Times asked whether the ambassador thinks U.S. officials in Iraq will be listened to by the
Iraqi government on issues of freedom of speech, human rights and power-sharing in government, now
that the United States has begun to withdraw troops from Iraq.
Hill: I don't think you need to have necessarily 130,000 troops in a country to remind a
politician of the need to observe human rights and respect the rule of law. . . . A country like
Iraq that wants to join the international community and reverse several decades of recent history
understands that the price of admission into that international community is quite often respect for
international norms of human rights. I don't think it's necessarily for American diplomats
to sell some kind of American form of human rights, but rather to be helpful to the government, in
this case in Iraq, to be helpful in seeing if they can implement some international norms that will
make them an equal member of the international community. What you need there is not so much troops
as experience and a certain amount of patience, and certainly an understanding of how these issues
need to be addressed in the world.
The Times asked whether the embassy will have enough information to judge what is happening in Iraqi
cities now that U.S. forces will be restricted in their movements and based outside of cities.
Hill: We have embassies operating in scores of countries, and developing good information about what
is going on is always a challenge anywhere in the world. I think our contacts in Iraq are better
than in most countries. Our ability to reach senior ministers, our ability to talk to people, get
their views and get information from them is pretty good in Iraq compared to many countries we
operate in. I personally don't feel we have a problem there. If you are comparing it to a time
when we ran all the security ourselves, that is obviously a different era. It was a different era
that was not sustainable for the rest of history. Clearly there is a point where you return security
to the host country security forces.
The Times asked whether with the drawdown of American forces in Iraq and the return of Iraqi
sovereignty, is it a sure thing that over time, Iraq is going to remain a democracy.
Hill: First of all, one has to acknowledge there are no sure things in the world. The real question
is not whether it is guaranteed but whether the Iraqis first of all have the motivation to stay on
this path; secondly have the exposure to what this path is like and what things they need to do to
journey on this path. And we believe that we have really invested very heavily in giving them the
capacity to stay on this path. Ultimately, whether they stay on the path or wander onto another path
is going to be up to them, but we believe we have given them the wherewithal to stay on the right
path. I think it's important to understand that we are not asking Iraqis to be Americans. We are
trying to help Iraqis with their own historical and cultural antecedents to be a democratic country
in an increasingly democratizing region and becoming a member of the international community in good
standing. I think these are all elements of things that Iraqis really want. When you talk to Iraqis,
you do hear from them a striving for normalcy. I don't think the majority of Iraqis would ever
want to see a return to Saddam Hussein or this sort of model which … has led them into such
catastrophes in the past. With the understanding there are no sure bets in life, I think we have
certainly given them a really good motivation and capacity to stay on the right road.
The Times asked whether the embassy, currently ranked the largest in the world, plans to downsize.
Hill: If you look at the average size of an embassy in the world, normally you wouldn't expect
to have this large an embassy in a country of this size. That said, we are engaged in a lot of
different things here, because of the need to be outside the belt of Baghdad and the need to try to
engage people in local areas. We have an enormous amount of staff that is out there. I would not
look for any dramatic reductions. But we will be constantly in the search for right-sizing efforts.
I would hope we can reduce in some areas. But overall what we are trying to do in this crucial year
of pivoting from the military to civilian presence, we are trying to make sure that we are able to
do this in a way that maintains the momentum that I think that is very much created by our military
being here especially in recent years.
-- Ned Parker and Liz Sly in Baghdad
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: July, 2009 ; RPCV Christopher Hill (Cameroon) ; Iraq ; Figures ; Peace Corps Cameroon ; Directory of Cameroon RPCVs ; Messages and Announcements for Cameroon RPCVs ; Diplomacy ; Rhode Island
When this story was posted in August 2009, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
Join Us Mr. President!
"We will double the size of the Peace Corps by its 50th anniversary in 2011. And we'll reach out to other nations to engage their young people in similar programs, so that we work side by side to take on the common challenges that confront all humanity," said Barack Obama during his campaign. Returned Volunteers rally and and march to the White House to support a bold new Peace Corps for a new age. Latest: Senator Dodd introduces Peace Corps Improvement and Expansion Act of 2009 .
Meet Aaron Williams - Our Next Director
Senator Dodd's Senate Subcommittee held confirmation hearings for Aaron Williams to become the 18th Peace Corps Director . "It's exciting to have a nominee who served in the Peace Corps and also has experience in international development and management," said Dodd as he put Williams on the fast track to be confirmed by the full Senate before the August recess. Read our exclusive coverage of the hearings and our biography of Peace Corps Director Aaron Williams .
Director Ron Tschetter: The PCOL Interview
Peace Corps Director Ron Tschetter sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss the evacuation from Bolivia, political appointees at Peace Corps headquarters, the five year rule, the Peace Corps Foundation, the internet and the Peace Corps, how the transition is going, and what the prospects are for doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. Read the interview and you are sure to learn something new about the Peace Corps. PCOL previously did an interview with Director Gaddi Vasquez .
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: LA Times
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Iraq; Figures; COS - Cameroon; Diplomacy
PCOL44444
61
Use this link to go directly to the discussion: