FW: BEYOND THE Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

1 view
Skip to first unread message

John D. Bostrom

unread,
May 22, 2010, 12:24:17 PM5/22/10
to peace-visioni...@googlegroups.com, Alice Slater, panys-steeri...@googlegroups.com, paaffi...@xmail.peace-action.org, pasi...@yahoogroups.com
Below, via Alice Slater, another perspective on the UN NPT Conference, from Western Australian activist Kerrie-Ann Garlick of FootPrints for Peace, who's spent the last five years after the abject failure of the 2005 NPT organizing Peace Walks They were very successful and got good press.- front page news in 20 newspapers, dozens of radio interviews, many educational evening gatherings featuring Senator Scott Ludham's DVD Climate of Hope, which shows the birth of nuclear power from nuclear weapons and the essential connection between them. Her work culminated in her attendance at "Abolition 2000's" May 2 NYC Rally, which she sees a convergence of four walks (north, east, south, west) with Hiroshima Flames. Immediately afterwards, however, she saw the NPT Conference unfortunately taken again in the wrong direction with H.Clinton's announcement of $100M more for IAEA to promote nuke energy.. With the entire focus of the NPT on the "peaceful use of atoms" - much more talk than ever before on that, and much less on disarmament -  Kerrie decided to ditch the UN altogether and went instead with the WRL non-violent resistance action at Grand Central where 80 people circled Info Booth, dropped banners, and handed out 2000 flyers to public in 90 minutes. 22 were arrested while 40 others sang in support. Then Kerrie attended a luncheon meeting of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development, where testimony was offered on the genocidal effect of the global nuclear power industry on indigenous peoples all over the world.  "As the failing of the 2010 NPT unfolds," will keep walking and organizing for the next five years with US, Canada, Europe, and Japan. The focus will be on "non-violent direct action for a nuclear-free future" and exposing the link between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. 
 
This email engages my ongoing interest in the divergence in the peace movement between those who see nuclear power and nuclear weapons as two sides of the same coin, to be connected wherever possible, and those who implicity or explicitly accept nuclear power and see talking about it at all as a distraction from the issues of nuclear weapons, disarmament, and abolition. Peace Action, from my perspective, seems to me to be pretty solidly in the second group,  but why that is is unclear, as are what may be underlying issues behind for this "difference of opinion." I suspect these have much to do with economics and class. Wonder what Noam Chomsky would say about this. Anyone know of any studies along this line?  My initial impulse is to see the divergence as a major problem to be overcome, but something tells me that ain't gonna happen anytime soon, and it may be one of those things where the most that can be accomplished is a better understanding of what's really going on.


From: Alice Slater [mailto:asl...@rcn.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 10:19 AM
To: abolitio...@yahoogroups.com; ufpj-...@yahoogroups.com; Abolition-Gl...@yahoogroups.com; inourl...@googlegroups.com
Subject: FW: BEYOND THE Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

 

Alice Slater

Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, NY

446 E. 86 St.

New York, NY 10028

212-744-2005

646-238-9000(cell)

asl...@rcn.com

www.wagingpeace.org

www.abolition2000.org

 

We may now care for each Earthian individual at a sustainable billionaire's level of affluence while living exclusively on less than 1 percent of our planet's daily energy income from our cosmically designed nuclear reactor, the Sun, optimally located 92 million safe miles away from us.

Buckminster Fuller

 

 

 


From: do-not...@causesmail.com [mailto:do-not...@causesmail.com] On Behalf Of Footprints for Peace
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 10:09 AM
To: asl...@rcn.com
Subject: BEYOND THE Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

 

Causes

Bulletin from the cause: Footprints for Peace

Go to Cause

Posted By: Marcus Atkinson

To: Members in Footprints for Peace

BEYOND THE Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

BEYOND THE NPT

Five years ago after the disappointing result of the Nuclear Non‐Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Footprints for Peace members committed to walking for 5 years in the United States and Europe to build a global resistance to the nuclear industry.

Our vision since 2005 to 2010 was fulfilled beyond our imagination.

On May 1st this year, four walks from the four directions came together creating an incredibly beautiful strong gathering of 200 people from all over the world displaying colour, creativity, diversity, resistance and solidarity for a nuclear free future.

On the same day, there was a women’s walk in Australia happening in solidarity and a walk in Scotland being organised.

With the support and help of many people we had successfully created peace walks for five years in Ireland, Scotland, England, France, Switzerland, Germany and Belgium and today it was a fabulous feeling to walk over the George Washington Bridge, New York and down Broadway with Native American people leading the walk with the Abolition Peace Flame being carried.

I thought of all the people we had met over those 5 years who are working so tirelessly for a nuclear free future and more importantly for those who we are walking for the people who are suffering daily at the hands of the nuclear industry.

It was one of the most amazing experiences I have had on a walk that has given me such enthusiasm to continue our work for a world without nukes.

Just as Cesar Chavez had said “To make a great dream come try, the first requirement is a great capacity to dream; the second is persistence”.

Over the 80 days on the walk from Oakridge, Tennessee where the Y12 nuclear weapons facility overshadows the beautiful town and land and covering a distance of 800 miles to the United Nations in New York we had much support from the local communities who housed, fed and hosted the walkers as we came through their towns.

We had a great many blessings to be thankful for.

We had discovered that at the grassroots level there is a massive peace movement carried in the hearts of American people. The media gave us front page news in over 20 newspapers along with dozens of radio interviews and coverage on one of America’s largest news channel, CNN as we walked closer to New York.
There were frequent evening gathering that drew large numbers of people from diverse backgrounds that left with a greater understanding about the dangers of the nuclear industry and the connections between uranium mining, nuclear power, weapons and waste.

Senator Scott Ludlam’s “Climate of Hope” DVD, was screened at every evening gathering during the walk. The DVD was met with great enthusiasm from local people who were inspired to organise more screenings in the future, in which we gave away all 200 copies. We distributed massive amounts of literature from Australia through our nightly stalls and on the streets as we walked. We spoke in schools, community centres, churches, town halls, mayors’ offices and council buildings, reaching thousands of people along the way.

On Sunday May 2nd a rally was organised by Abolition 2000, and 10,000 people marched on the streets of New York from Time Square down to the United Nations.
Included in those numbers were 2,000 people from Japan who had come over for the 40th year of NPT review conference to strongly voice their desire to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

One of the most powerful moments of the day was the abolition flame that our walked had carried since the beginning of the walk was met with four other flames from Hiroshima. Together these flames were carried at the front of the rally with the Mayor Akiba (from Hiroshima where the flame originated), Mayor Bob Harvey (who lit the flame from Hiroshima and took it to NZ for the start of the World March), Kenneth Deer Secretary of the Mohawk Nation at Kahnawake, part of the Mohawk Nation and the Haudenosaunee, Rafael de La Rubia (World March) and Marcus Atkinson (Footprints for Peace).

At the end of the rally two of the Abolition Flames were presented to Sergio Duarte the UN Under Secretary and High Representative for Disarmament and Marcus Atkinson (Footprints for Peace) from Australia and Rafael de La Rubia (World without Wars) had been given this honorary job. Marcus handed Secretary Sergio Duarte not only the flame but peace cranes with a message from Australia to stop uranium mining.

This year again has been disappointing. Hillary Clinton, in her opening speech declared an increase of 100 million US dollars in funding for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to step up its promotion of nuclear energy. For me this totally set the agenda for the NPT to focus more on the ‘peaceful use of atoms’ rather than creating a serious “action plan” to dismantle nuclear weapons. We all know that the Nations that have nuclear weapons do not want to seriously give up their weapons of mass destruction and want to control other Nations from getting nuclear weapons.

This year I felt there were even more talk and guarantees for more money to be spent on nuclear energy than I have heard on nuclear disarmament. With this I feel a sense of urgency to stop uranium mining more than ever. I feel that if the Nations are serious about nuclear disarmament then they would be putting a moratorium on mining uranium. So I decided to ditch the talks at the NPT and get involved in the nonviolence direct action being organised by the War Resisters League.

Marking the beginning of the UN Nuclear Non‐proliferation Treaty Review Conference the War Resisters League on Monday May 3rd declared New York City a nuclear weapons free zone at Grand Central Station. Twenty‐ two people from all different age groups were arrested for asserting that nuclear disarmament should begin in the US.
As people rushed to work, huge banners on either side of the station got hung reading “Nuclear Weapons = Terrorism”. About 80 of us circled the information booth and continued walking around handing out flyers and carrying banners urging the US government to disarm. We handed out 2000 flyers in just over an hour. At 9.00am when most of the flyers had been handed out the “die‐in” began and people started to get arrested in a very calmly manner. About 40 people supported the people doing the “die-in” by singing many great songs….including many versus of "We gunna keep on walking forward”. It was wonderful to be a part of this action and be inspired by many people risking arrest.

The other inspiring event during the NPT was the Commission on Sustainable Development that was happening at the same time. In the framework of the 18th Session of the Commission for Sustainable Development addressed the issues of mining and waste in its current 2 year cycle. In relation to this the NGO group “Women in Europe for a Common Future” organized a lunch event on “Uranium Mining

Clear Perspectives on a Dirty Business” where we heard stories from a Navajo women, Bettie Yazzie whose husband died from lung cancer in 1974 after working 10 years in a uranium mine site operated by Union Carbide Corporation. She only speaks Navajo and was accompanied by a translator, Gilbert Badoni who is Navajo himself and son of uranium miner from Colorado. We heard that Gilberts’ entire family has cancer.

We heard from a man from the Khasi tribe of Meghalaya in India who has been defending the rights of indigenous people in West Khasi Hills of North East India who happen to live in an area of great biodiversity richness but also on high‐grade uranium reserves. The Central Government of India and State Government of Meghalaya want to cut down 500 hectares of virgin forest to mine the uranium for nuclear programs. Look out for a film “Where the Clouds Come Home” produced by Chris Stone, Small Seed Films about the proposed uranium mining in Meghalaya. You can see the trailer at http://smallseedfilms.blogspot.com/

Included in the event was a fabulous panel discussion from the President of the NGO “Aghir in Man” who spoke on the situation of the Tuareg tribes in Niger on uranium mining activities of French nuclear operator AREVA.

We heard from Citizens for Justice, Malawi on the social, economic and environmental effects of uranium mining and Malawis newly opened uranium mine Kayelekera.
See http://www.cfjmalawi.org
for more information.

And finally with very little time from Ulla Kloetzer from Women Against Nuclear Power, Women for Peace, Finland on uranium mining and nuclear waste repositories in Finland. Because she had very little time she is going to email the detailed power point presentation she had prepared, and I will send this forward to anyone that would like a copy.
Many international participants in this meeting agreed that we need something like this to happen for the NPT!! It was a fabulous inspiring event for the many people talking about the absolute need to have a moratorium on uranium mining. Of course we couldn’t resist the opportunity to talk about Roxby Downs uranium mine site and Australia’s situation as the flyer for the event had used Roxby Downs as the picture of a uranium mine and tailings site.
Human rights ahead of economic rights!! So as the failing of the NPT 2010 unfolds, Footprints for Peace this month will launch a campaign for the next five years and beyond and commit to organizing grass roots non-violence direct actions for a nuclear free future beginning from Yeeliree, Western Australia next year. We will organize actions in Australia in Canada, the USA, Europe and Japan as our dedication to creating awareness of the genocide that continues today on indigenous peoples and their land from the nuclear industry.
Kerrie‐Ann Garlick

Footprints for Peace
For a Nuclear Free Future

www.footprintsforpeace.net

Call to Action

FOOTPRINTS FOR PEACE

Fundraising Project: FOOTPRINTS FOR PEACE

You are receiving this email because you are a member of the cause Footprints for Peace.
To unsubscribe, leave the cause

Causes Privacy Policy | Causes Address: PO Box 492, Berkeley, CA 94708 United States

Tip: Add no-r...@causes.com to your address book to make sure you don't miss any opportunities to change the world.

image001.png

John D. Bostrom

unread,
May 24, 2010, 9:19:37 PM5/24/10
to Alice Slater, peace-visioni...@googlegroups.com, panys-steeri...@googlegroups.com, paaffi...@xmail.peace-action.org, pasi...@yahoogroups.com, Carol Price Husten, cheryl wertz, Kevin Martin, judithl...@gmail.com
Thanks, Alice. My point of view about Peace Action's position on nuclear power is based solely on the topics I've heard discussed, and the calls for action I've heard made, in the last eight years or so since I've been involved in Peace Action. I've heard over and over about nuclear weapons, disarmament, abolition, the military budget, and even, to a much more limited extent, counter-recruitment. But I've seen relatively very little activity around or positions take re: nuclear power, and certainly no strong attempt to make a connection between nuclear power and nuclear energy as a fundamental issue.  Peace Action may have taken a position on the issue long ago, but we also took a strong position on economic conversion back when Seymour Melman was around, and for all the attention that's getting now, it might as well have never happened.
The email you forwarded took a very different tone from our more celebratory attitude toward the NPT Conference, and the difference seemed to be centered on the attention, or lack of it, given the issue of nuclear power.  I'm ambivalent myself on the issue and have been looking for a coherent viewpoint, and I'm puzzled that the emphasis is so different from different areas of the peace movement, and I'm just trying to understand why that is.. 
Of course, differences are what make things interesting.  Rona and I went to a performance of Beethoven's 9th on Saturday, and the different voices from the horns, strings, woods, and drums reminded me very much of different opinions and agendas in the conversation that makes up a movement or indeed society.   Still, the differences between cacophony, dissonance, harmony, and unison in a social movement are at least worth some conscious consideration.


From: Alice Slater [mailto:asl...@rcn.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 3:22 PM
To: 'John D. Bostrom'; peace-visioni...@googlegroups.com
Cc: panys-steeri...@googlegroups.com; paaffi...@xmail.peace-action.org; pasi...@yahoogroups.com; 'Carol Price Husten'; 'cheryl wertz'; 'Kevin Martin'; judithl...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: BEYOND THE Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

Dear John,

I was quite surprised to learn that Peace Action has not taken a position against nuclear power, given that nuclear proliferation by India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, was a direct result of their using “peaceful” technology to manufacture nuclear weapons.  Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa actually had begun nuclear weapons programs from their “peaceful” atoms, but decided to give them up.  That happened most recently with Libya.  Of course the issue of weapons proliferation is only one in a host of awful problem such as the ill effects to health, the environment, the impossibility of figuring out how to store the toxic mess for 250,000 years, the devastating effect on indigenous people who bear the brunt of the lethal pollution from uranium mining,  and the fact that investments in nuclear power are so expensive that they actually exacerbate global warming as you can get much more carbon reduction putting those dollars into sustainable energy and efficiency.   See Amory Lovins at http://www.rmi.org/rmi/Library/E08-01_NuclearIllusion

 

Attached is chapter I wrote for a book on the issue if you care to share this information.  Also, here is a link to the NGO Statement which we presented to the delegates at the NPT objecting to their Report on all the wonderful benefits of nuclear power.   http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/npt/revcon2010/ngostatements/AbolitionCaucus-MCIII.pdf

 

I don’t think my email will reach anyone but you or Cheryl, Carol, Kevin and Judith as I’m not subscribed to the lists above.  So please feel free to share it, if you think it’s worthwhile in terms of illuminating the issues you raised.   Warmest regards, Alice

 

Alice Slater

Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, NY

446 E. 86 St.

New York, NY 10028

212-744-2005

646-238-9000(cell)

asl...@rcn.com

www.wagingpeace.org

www.abolition2000.org

 

We may now care for each Earthian individual at a sustainable billionaire's level of affluence while living exclusively on less than 1 percent of our planet's daily energy income from our cosmically designed nuclear reactor, the Sun, optimally located 92 million safe miles away from us.

Buckminster Fuller

 

 

 

image002.jpg
sig2_files/image001.png
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages