Socialism is unnatural and decadent

[Rob]

If honesty has any intrinsic value then it would be honest for all
socialists to pull off their masks of piety and admit that they are
amongst the weaker of the herd, and it is for that reason only that
they propose a system in which the stronger ones would pull some of
the weight that the weaker ones should be pulling themselves.
Obviously the paraplegic or the blind person can't pull much weight,
and niether can the very old. But of those who are more or less
healthy, why should some be allowed to be lazy, addicted, day-
dreaming, faking incapacity, satisfied with their ignorance, birthing
litters of children...when they could be trained out of those ways of
being by various types of instruction including boot-camps.

Mother Nature has clearly intended that all beasts have diversity of
size and strength, including cognitive strength and cunning. We know
from studies throughout all the non-homo sapiens animal world that
this diversity set up by Mother Nature herself has the wonderful
effect of keeping species strong and healthy and beautiful. Though
frightening to all animals including homo-sapiens, the Bengal Tiger is
extremely beautiful both at rest and in motion. From studies in
evolutionary processes it is now absolutely clear that no species ever
becomes strong, beautiful,healthy and long lasting except by being
pummeled between the hammer and anvil of the forces of nature such as
foul weather, predation and the urge, hunt and often fight for
reproductive rights.

In the absence of the perfection producing forces of nature any
species goes into decline and suffers ill health, weakness and
diminuition, and often times extinction. If homo-sapiens is an
animal, and all evidence suggests that to be the case, then socialism
can only lead to the destruction of homo sapiens as one of the most
beautiful and awesom creations of Mother Nature, turning it instead
into something sickly and weak, which one would then expect to be
ravaged by epidemics, the first of which we may have had now in the
form of AIDS. Socialism leads to decadence and decay.

Socialists like to tell themselves at their parties that they are
superior creatures with superior intellects - they even go so far as
to claim that they are the next evolution beyond homo sapiens. What
vanity! Such vanity is surely a sign of decadence. If the truth be
known, most socialists suffer from poor cognitive functioning -
actually due to a brain that does not work like a German automobile,
but one that works more like an auto from India. Most socialists are
also in poor physical health, and rarely good looking. In grades 1-12
they suffered poor social standing...they were not "cool", nor even
normal.

The love of socialism is a reaction by sad children cum adults who
have inside them 12 or more years of pent-up childhood RESENTMENT,
resentment of Mother Nature herself, which they direct at Mother
Nature's favorite human flowers - the beautiful, the strong, the
cognitively superior and the happy at heart. The love of socialism is
akin to a personality disorder which probably can be overcome, but
would require a lot of hard work and letting go of RESENTMENT. The
solution seems out of the reach of the lover of socialism, since they
are the weaker members of the herd and likely lack the various
qualities of character and body needed to do that hard work. As for
the RESENTMENT, it is possible to just open the hand and let it go,
but the hand of the lover of socialsim is clenched so tightly it does
not seem likely that even mighty Zeus, nor even Krishna himself would
be able to pry it open.

The socialist's clenched hand is the clenched hand of an egotistical
squalling infant. It is the ego of the infant. To let go of
RESENTMENT would be, for the socialist, akin to a loss of ego, and
thus a loss of identity. The socialist would not know who he or she
was if the RESENTMENT was released. He or she would have to start
over and build a new personlity - the task is daunting, and thus
rarely undertaken.


It should be obvious that lovers of socialism share certain genetic
traits, namely some of their genes are weak and not properly formed in
the sperm-egg fertilization process. Within a decade or two, given
the pace of current genetic research, it should be possible to
identify those kinds of genetic weaknesses that are likely to make
socialist babies, and if detectable in-utero the fetus can be
aborted. In cases where the odds of passing on a genetic weakness to
child are high, the potential parents can be sterilized - there are
many children needing adoption.

In time, with concerted effort and scientific approach, the human herd
can purge itself of weak genes and thus end once and for all the
arguments for and against socialism, as we could prevent the birthing
of any human animal so weak that it would favor socialism just because
it is weak.

Let us be honest. Let us begin the real discussion of the 21st
centrury: perspectives are largely caused by genetic endowments and
shortcomings and have no possible basis in any scheme of cosmic right
and wrong. As we are already moving beyond right and wrong, good and
evil, now we must keep going and favor only what is strong, beautiful,
cognitively superior and happy of heart (lacking resentment). That is
the true path to a wonderful human future, and one that will also have
good immunity to disease and persist for perhaps for a billion years.