FIR definition for pdrtpy

[Carl Ferkinhoff]

Hi pdrtpy folks,

Thanks for the great tool and all the on going development of pdrtpy.

Suggestion, can you add to the pdrtpy website a recomendation for the definition of FIR to use? I.e. what wavelength one should be using for the FIR. I see that there was a recent post in the google group (https://groups.google.com/g/pdrt/c/Qs6SjX8EAhg/m/nY5HHULDAgAJ) where Mark recommends using 8 um to 1000 um (i.e. the total IR or TIR). I just did a quick puruesal of all the main references for pdrtpy and the website and I could see the recommendation anywhere. Maybe I missed it, but if I missed it, others probably did too. Including it on this page near the same section where it talks about corrections for filling factors would be helpful.

Thanks!

Carl 

[Mark Wolfire]

Hi Carl

  Thanks very much for catching this and will we include it as you suggest.

Mark

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PDR Toolbox" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pdrt+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pdrt/24dbc1d8-80ee-4535-ad2f-8d2e0cb28632n%40googlegroups.com.

[Marc W. Pound]

hi Carl,

Thanks for the suggestion. I've created an issue to track it: https://github.com/mpound/pdrtpy/issues/181

Marc

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pdrt/CAFyQ9sWYPwbKXhDrc55okuZAU%2BeHAsGK_yqnRR3gqwr13HrcnQ%40mail.gmail.com.

--

Dr. Marc Pound
Research Scientist
Astronomy Department
University of Maryland, College Park

https://www.astro.umd.edu/~mpound

mpo...@umd.edu | 301.405.1520 | https://umd.zoom.us/my/marc.pound