Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism

Skip to first unread message

James Redford

Feb 23, 2007, 11:16:02 AM2/23/07
The U.S. government has a well-documented history (i.e., modus
operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the
Pearl Harbor attack, Operation Northwoods (which although didn't go
forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff
signed off on it), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade
Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the 9/11 attacks, and
etc., etc., etc.

Those who control the U.S. government didn't just know in advance and
intentionally let the 9/11 attacks happen as a Hegelian dialectical
PsyOp in order to obtain more power and control--they funded,
shepherded, trained and protected the terrorists every step of the
way. They didn't just intentionally let it happen: they made it

The below post by me contains the November 10, 2003 article "September
11--Islamic Jihad or Another Northwoods?" by Tim Howells, Ph.D., which
is a very good, short introduction to just some of the more damning
mainstream major media articles and U.S. government primary
documentation which proves up one side and down the other that the
9/11 attacks and the following anthrax attacks were a Hegelian
dialectical PsyOp staged by the U.S. government as a pretext in order
to obtain more power and control. I append my own additional endnotes
at the conclusion of Dr. Howells' article, in order to add further
mainstream documentation.

From: James Redford <>
Subject: The U.S. Government Staged the 9/11 Attacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:56 GMT

And see also the below two books concerning the U.S. government
staging the 9/11 attacks:

The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked, September 11th,
2001 by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, foreword and afterword by John Leonard
(Tree of Life Publications; June 2002), ISBN: 0-930852-40-0
(0930852400), 400 pages:

The best analysis and documentation on the global elite's bankrolling
and creation of modern Islamic fundamentalism of the Afghanistan
variety that I found is in the beginning chapters of the above book.

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush
Administration and 9/11 by Prof. David Ray Griffin, foreword by Prof.
Richard Falk (Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing
Group, Inc.]; March 2004), ISBN: 1-56656-552-9 (1566565529), 256

Or, to find it elswhere online, see the below Google link:

See also:

"50 years on, Lavon Affair still sparks public debate in Israel," Dan
Baron, Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), July 20, 2004: News Archive: Israeli Roots of Hamas:

"Puppet On A String: Hamas Dances To Israel's Tune" by Paul Joseph

"9/11 and Anthrax: FRAMING ARABS,"

"Tracking the 19 Hijackers--What are they up to now?--At least 9 of
them survived 9/11,"

"Extreme Right: Spark intifada to prevent expulsions," Efrat Weiss,
Yedioth Ahronoth, June 14, 2006:,7340,L-3263038,00.html

"Israeli agents accused of creating fake al-Qaeda cell," Sophie
Claudet, Agence France-Presse (AFP), December 9, 2002:

"The Phony (Mossad) Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine,"

"Mossad Exposed in Phony 'Palestinian Al-Qaeda' Caper," Michele
Steinberg and Hussein Askary, Executive Intelligence Review (EIR),
Volume 29, Number 49, December 20, 2002:

"Nidal planned to oust Saddam,", August 28, 2002:

"The Palestinian terrorist, Abu Nidal, was working for the Israeli
intelligence agency, Mossad, for the last four years and was plotting
a coup against Iraqi president Saddam Hussain at the behest of Western
powers, top diplomats said.":

"Hamas history tied to Israel," Richard Sale, UPI Terrorism
Correspondent From the International Desk, United Press International
(UPI), June 18, 2002:

"The Hamas-Likud Pairing," Editorial, Jerusalem Post, August 25, 1995:

"Israeli Roots of Hamas are being exposed," Dean Andromidas, Executive
Intelligence Review (EIR), Volume 29, Number 2, January 18, 2002:

"Sharon War Plan Exposed: Hamas Gang Is His Tool," Jeffrey Steinberg,
Executive Intelligence Review (EIR), Volume 28, Number 27, July 20,

"Israel's Hamas," George Szamuely, The New York Press, Volume 15,
Issue 17, April 2002:

Israel's Sacred Terrorism: A Study Based on Moshe Sharett's Personal
Diary and Other Documents by Livia Rokach, foreword by Noam Chomsky
(AAUG Press; Third Edition: 1986), ISBN: 0-937694-70-3 (0937694703):


And let us not forget that the largest terrorist act in Palestine was
and remains the bombing of the King David Hotel on July 26, 1946 by
Jews dressed as Arabs. 91 people were killed and around 45 people were
injured. The attack was ordered by David Ben Gurion and directed by
Menachem Begin, both of whom would later become Israeli Prime
Ministers. For more on that, see:

"King David Hotel bombing," Wikipedia:

"The Bombing Of The King David Hotel":

"British anger at terror celebration," Ned Parker and Stephen Farrell,
The Times (U.K.), July 20, 2006:,,3-2277717,00.html,,1-3-2277717-3,00.html,,322475,00.jpg

See also: News Articles Archive:

"5/18/03 Nine killed in double Jerusalem suicide bombing
Police Chief Shlomo Aharonishki said the first bomber was disguised as
an Orthodox Jew and that a skullcap and prayer shawl were found on
him. (Interesting that nobody ever suspects that bombers who look like
Arabs might be in disguise, especially since the King David Hotel was
blown up by Israelis dressed as Arabs, not to mention the infamous
Lavon Affair. In any event, the timing makes it obvious that the
bombings were intended to derail the peace process. Now, who wanted
that to happen? That's your ultimate mastermind.)"


First the rhetoric about invading Iraq was because Iraq was supposed
to have been involved in the 9/11 attacks, but absolutely no evidence
of that could be produced so that line was dropped. Then it was
because Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, but no such weapons have
been found, so that line has been dropped. Now it's about "liberating"
the Iraqi people--how absolutely selfless and thoughtful Bush & Co.
are to spend billions of U.S. tax-payers' money and sacrifice
thousands of U.S. soldiers' lives in the effort to free the Iraqi
people by taking their personal firearms away. I suppose the next
thing Bush & Co. are going to do is sell all their worldly
possessions, donate the proceeds to charity and join a monastary.

But anyone parroting the "liberation" line is either a truly ignorant
person or a lying sycophant--the same goes with the other lines, as
well. This war has not the slightest thing in the world to do with
"liberating" the Iraqi people--other than liberating them from their
oil reserves and strategic military real-estate. We have this
Presidential administration's own official statements regarding their
intent to invade Iraq made almost exactly one year before the 9/11
attacks, saying in their official policy report that they would still
invade Iraq even if Saddam and his regime no longer existed. So this
invasion has not the slightest thing in the world to do with Saddam or
whatever political system was in operation in that country--the U.S.
was going to invade Iraq no matter what.

Below are particularly relevant excerpts from the document "Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century,"
Project for the New American Century, September 2000 ( ):

Page 14 (or 26 in the PDF browser):

"While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in
the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

Page 17 (or 29 in the PDF browser):

"From an American perspective, the value of such bases would endure
even should Saddam pass from the scene."


Page 51 (or 63 in the PDF browser):

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor."

And they got their "new Pearl Harbor" twelve months later. How very
fortunate for them and their globe-dominating "Project."

Below are the June 3, 1997 signers of the Project for the New American
Century's Statement of Principles ( ):

Elliott Abrams
Gary Bauer
William J. Bennett
Jeb Bush
Dick Cheney
Eliot A. Cohen
Midge Decter
Paula Dobriansky
Steve Forbes
Aaron Friedberg
Francis Fukuyama
Frank Gaffney
Fred C. Ikle
Donald Kagan
Zalmay Khalilzad
I. Lewis Libby
Norman Podhoretz
Dan Quayle
Peter W. Rodman
Stephen P. Rosen
Henry S. Rowen
Donald Rumsfeld
Vin Weber
George Weigel
Paul Wolfowitz

See also:

"U.S. Harbored Terrorists to Bolster Its Case," Matt Bivens, Moscow
Times, March 15, 2004, Page 8

"Secret Bechtel Documents Reveal: Yes, It Is About Oil," David
Lindorff, CounterPunch, April 9, 2003

"Crude Vision: How Oil Interests Obscured US Government Focus On
Chemical Weapons Use by Saddam Hussein," Jim Vallette, Steve Kretzmann
and Daphne Wysham, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network/Institute
for Policy Studies, 2nd edition: August 13, 2002 ,


It was the FBI that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993:

None of this would be known today if it were not for the FBI's
undercover agent Emad A. Salem taping his conversations with his FBI
handlers (unbeknownst to them). Salem thought that the FBI might try
to pin it on him so he took measures to protect himself. Indeed,
without the FBI the '93 WTC bombing would never have happened, as it
was agent Salem who built the bomb for the would-be Muslim
"terrorists." Salem wanted to use fake ingredients for the "bomb" but
the FBI ordered him to make a real one. When the making of the bomb
was complete Salem told the FBI that they could now arrest the
would-be terrorists, but the FBI told Salem that the bombing is to go
forward. After agent Salem went public with his tapes in a news
conference the FBI found it necessary to pay him over a million
dollars just to shut him up.

For more on the above, see the below New York Times articles:

"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast,"
Ralph Blumenthal, New York Times, October 28, 1993, Section A, Page 1,
Column 4;

"Tapes in Bombing Plot Show Informer and F.B.I. at Odds," Ralph
Blumenthal, New York Times, October 27, 1993, Section A, Page 1,
Column 4:

And see also:

"Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed," Paul
DeRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash, The Shadow, October
1994/January 1995 Issue:

On the above webpage you can find the below two audio clips from one
of Emad A. Salem's recorded telephone conversations with one of his
FBI handlers, FBI Special Agent John Anticev: (Backup copy.)

The above clip is an excerpt from the below longer clip: (Backup copy.)

The above clips are from a broadcast on WBAI Radio in the city of New
York which aired this taped conversation between Emad A. Salem and FBI
Special Agent John Anticev.

The below transcript is from 2:57 to 4:31 min:sec from the longer clip

FBI Special Agent John Anticev: But, uh, basically nothing has
changed. I'm just telling you for my own sake that nothing, that this
isn't a salary, that it's--you know. But you got paid regularly for
good information. I mean the expenses were a little bit out of the
ordinary and it was really questioned. Don't tell Nancy I told you
this. [Nancy Floyd is another FBI Special Agent who worked with Emad
A. Salem in his informant capacity.]

FBI undercover agent Emad A. Salem: Well, I have to tell her of

Anticev: Well then, if you have to, you have to.

Salem: Yeah, I mean because the lady was being honest and I was being
honest and everything was submitted with a receipt and now it's

Anticev: It's not questionable, it's like a little out of the

Salem: Okay. Alright. I don't think it was. If that's what you think
guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already
building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was
built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A. and we
was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built.
By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Anticev: Well.

Salem: And then he put his head in the sand and said "Oh, no, no,
that's not true, he is son of a bitch." [Deep breath.] Okay. It's
built with a different way in another place and that's it.

Anticev: No, don't make any rash decisions. I'm just trying to be as
honest with you as I can.

Salem: Of course, I appreciate that.

Anticev: And as far as the payments go, and everything like that,
they're there. I guarantee you that they are there.


Concerning the Oklahoma City bombing, see the below links:

"The Oklahoma City Bombing--PROOF there were additional explosive
charges," Oklahoma City Bombing page:

"Bomb Damage Analysis of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building," Brigadier
General Benton K. Partin, retired Commander of the U.S. Air Force
Armament Technology Laboratory, July 30, 1995:

"Was FBI early arrival in Oklahoma City?--Hotel receipt shows top
terror man showed up 9 hours before blast," Jon Dougherty,, January 19, 2002:

Iraqis were definitely involved in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah
Federal building in Oklahoma City. There is quite a lot of evidence
demonstrating this. We even know the names of some of those Iraqis,
like Al-Hussaini Hussain, who was also working as a baggage-handler at
Boston's Logan International Airport during the 9/11 attacks, which is
where American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175
originated from.

Al-Hussaini Hussain is the person that witnesses identify as John Doe
No. 2 who was with Timothy McVeigh in dropping off the Ryder truck in
front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building. He was arrested by the
FBI trying to leave the U.S. and his release was ordered by Bill
Clinton through the Justice Department. Found in his custody during
that arrest was the blue jogging suit that witnesses described.

Al-Hussaini Hussain is former Iraqi Republican Guard, and four other
former Iraqi Republican Guard members were arrested soon after the
bombing of the Murrah Federal building, but their release was ordered
by Bill Clinton. These former Iraqi Republican Guard members are part
of the 3,500+ Iraqi military members and their family brought into the
U.S. after the Gulf War by George Bush, Sr. and further continued by
Bill Clinton. For more on this transfer of Iraqi military into the
U.S., see the below major media news articles:

"Iraq POWs Paid to Resettle in U.S.; Lawmakers Protest," Richard A.
Serrano, Los Angeles Times, August 24, 1993:

"Resettling Iraqi POWs in U.S. Criticized; Lawmakers Urge Clinton to
End 'Potentially Dangerous' Policy," William Claiborne, Washington
Post, August 25, 1993:

Many of the confiscated tapes of the twelve video survailance cameras
that were in front of the Murrah Federal building record exactly what
witnesses described: Al-Hussaini Hussain dropping off the Ryder truck
with Timothy McVeigh--Al-Hussaini Hussain as the passenger and Timothy
McVeigh as the driver. And this according to high-level FBI sources
who have seen the tapes, as quoted by the Los Angeles Times and
Oklahoma City KFOR-TV news. These video survailance tapes were
confiscated by the U.S. government under the National Security Act.

For more on this evidence which I have been relating to you, I urge
you to watch at least the first part (which deals with the Oklahoma
City bombing) of the video documentary 911: The Road to Tyranny by
journalist Alex Jones, of which can be viewed below in its entirety
for free:

911: the Road to Tyranny by Alex Jones:

And see:

"Search For The Missing Iraqis: Ask Daddy Bush And Clinton" by Wade

See also:

"The real story of Iraqis at OKC bombing. Not the one you think!":

As well, see the below book which is online in its entirety and for

The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror by David Hoffman,
foreward by Oklahoma State Representative Charles Key (Feral House,
1998), ISBN: 0-922915-49-0 (0922915490):

The above book by David Hoffman is very thoroughly referenced, and is
introduced by Oklahoma State Rep. Charles Key. For more on this book
and its author, see the below webpage:


Concerning the Pearl Harbor attack:

As just another among many, many examples of the U.S. government's use
of staged Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks, President Franklin D.
Roosevelt knew in advance and intentionally allowed (and provoked) the
Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. See, for example:

"The McCollum Memo: The Smoking Gun of Pearl Harbor":

And that's just one among many, many smoking guns proving that the
Pearl Harbor attack was an intentionally staged Hegelian dialectic by
the U.S. government. For many more such smoking-gun, Freedom of
Information Act-released U.S. government documents proving that the
U.S. government knew exactly when Japan was going to attack Pearl
Harbor, as well as their efforts to provoke exactly this response, see
the book Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor by Robert
B. Stinnett. For more on just some of that, see:

"Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of
Pearl Harbor?," an interview with Robert B. Stinnett by Douglas
Cirignano, The Independent Institute, March 11, 2002:

And for a list of dozens of hardcore smoking guns proving the Pearl
Harbor attack was an intentionally staged Hegelian dialectic by the
U.S. government, see:

"Pearl Harbor: Mother of All Conspiracies" by Mark Emerson Willey:


Terrorism is the health of the state, which is why so many governments
throughout history have manufactured terrorism in which to serve as a
pretext in order to usurp ever more power and control.

Below is documentation on Vladimir "Mr. Hexogen" Putin* and the 9/99
Russian apartment building bombings:

The September 1999 Russian apartment building terror-bombing campain
used hexogen (i.e., cyclonite; RDX) as the explosive and was blamed on
Chechen terrorists despite there being not the slightest shred of
evidence that Chechens were behind it, and it later turned out that
the bombings were done by the Russian government itself (i.e., under
former KGB spy and FSB head, and then Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin)
in order to get the Russian people behind another war against Chechnya
(oh, how familiar it all sounds!)--indeed, the Russian government
(i.e., the FSB, the present-day KGB) was actually caught red-handed by
local police and citizens in the city of Ryazan planting live
explosives (i.e., hexogen) with live detonators in an apartment

The below article by David Satter, published by the Hudson Institute,
is probably the best overall article concerning much of the evidence
that the 9/99 Russian terrorist bombings were done by the Russian
government. The National Review article is simply based upon the
Hudson Institute article, but without the very important and
informative endnotes (and so I recommend that you read the Hudson
Institute article).

"The Shadow of Ryazan: Who Was Behind the Strange Russian Apartment
Bombings in September 1999?," David Satter, Hudson Institute, April
19, 2002:

"The Shadow of Ryazan--Is Putin's government legitimate?," David
Satter, National Review, April 30, 2002:

The below website, Terror-99, deals with the Russian government's
involvement in the 9/99 Russian terrorist bombings, and has a huge
amount of mainstream major-media news-articles demonstrating that the
Russian government was behind the bombings:

For an additional amount of vital evidence not covered in the David
Satter article, see the below two articles:

"Bali Halloween," Israel Shamir:

"Fear of Doing the Boss a Disservice," Moscow Times, April 11, 2002,
pg. 8:

David Satter has also written more on this matter in the below book by

Darkness at Dawn: The Rise of the Russian Criminal State (Yale
University Press, 2003):



* "'Gospodin Geksogen' ('Mr. Hexogen')," Dr. Alexandr Nemets and Dr.
Thomas Torda,, July 19, 2002


"'Mr. Hexogen' (Continued)," Dr. Alexandr Nemets and Dr. Thomas Torda,, July 23, 2002


PRESIDENT Bush said yesterday that he wanted Osama bin Laden, the
Saudi exile, "dead or alive" in some of the most bellicose language
used by a White House occupant in recent years.

"I want justice," he said after a meeting at the Pentagon, where 188
people were killed last Tuesday when an airliner crashed into the
building. "And there's an old poster out West that says, 'Wanted: Dead
or Alive.' "

He then seemed to temper his remarks by adding: "All I want and
America wants is to see them brought to justice. That's what we want."

From "Bin Laden is wanted: dead or alive, says Bush," Toby Harnden,
Telegraph (U.K.), September 18, 2001

Q: But then you believe the threat that bin Laden posed won't truly be
eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?

Bush: Well, as I say, we hadn't heard much from him. And I wouldn't
necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, you
know, again, I don't know where he is. . . . I repeat what I said: I
truly am not that concerned about him. . . .

From "'It's Not Helpful What the Israelis Have Recently Done,'"
Federal News Service via Washington Post, March 14, 2002; Page A20 ;
"Press Conference by the President: The James S. Brady Briefing Room,"
Office of the Press Secretary, March 13, 2002

A plot to carry out a large-scale terror attack against the United
States in the near future is being directed by Osama bin Laden and
other top al Qaeda members, senior intelligence officials said

From "Officials: Bin Laden guiding plots against U.S.--Ridge:
Terrorists' aim is to influence presidential vote," Mike Ahlers, CNN,
July 8, 2004

"When [Osama bin Laden] says he's going to hurt the American people
again, or try to, he means it," Bush told reporters after visiting the
NSA, where the surveillance program is based. "I take it seriously,
and the people of NSA take it seriously."

From "Bush: Take bin Laden attack threat seriously--President rejects
renewed criticism of warrantless spying program," Associated Press
(AP), January 26, 2006

See also:

"Let Bin Laden stay free, says CIA man," Tony Allen-Mills, Sunday
Times (U.K.), January 9, 2005,,2089-1431539,00.html

"C.I.A. Closes Unit Focused on Capture of bin Laden," Mark Mazzetti,
New York Times, July 4, 2006

"Osama bin Laden: A Weapon of Mass Convenience,"


"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an
endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."--H. L. Mencken,
"Women as Outlaws," A Mencken Chrestomathy (1949), pg. 29. This essay
was first published in The Smart Set, December 1921.

"Government seems important to a people to the degree that it takes
away their production in taxes. Correlary: The more the government
takes the larger proportion of a people work for the government.
Correlary: Without war or threat of imminent danger the government
can't take a very large proportion of a people's production in taxes.
Correlary: Without war or threat of imminent danger, government is not
important. Correlary: Without war or the threat of imminent danger,
the government will create them."--Steve Solomon,

"In some ways [Julia] was far more acute than Winston, and far less
susceptible to Party propaganda. Once when he happened in some
connection to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by
saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The
rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the
Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened.' This
was an idea that had literally never occurred to him."--George Orwell
in his book 1984


For more documentation on the U.S. government-staged 9/11 PsyOp
attacks, see the below articles:

"Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?," Steven E.
Jones, Ph.D., former professor in the Department of Physics and
Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Journal of 911 Studies, Vol. 3
(September 2006): (Older

"Experiments with Molten Aluminum," Steven E. Jones with Wesley
Lifferth, Jared Dodson, Jacob Stevenson and Shannon Walch, circa June

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H.
Fetzer, University of Minnesota:

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account
Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in
New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

"Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11
Oral Histories," Prof. David Ray Griffin,, January 18,


A truly vital piece of evidence that provides definitive proof that
the World Trade Center towers were brought down by controlled
demolition is the video of yellow to white-hot molten metal seen
cascading off the South Tower.

Folks, that piece of evidence isn't merely a smoking gun: it's a
smoking nuclear cannon. That video, alone and by itself, is
irrefragable *proof* that the South Tower (at the very least) had
thermite-like ("like" in the sense of producing comparable
temperatures) incendiary demolition charges with the ability to easily
slice through structural steel going off within it. There is no
innocent explanation for what that video records.

That is to say, the only way to get around that it is thermite which
is causing that yellow-hot metal to cascade off the South Tower before
its collapse would be to posit that we are seeing a different form of
extremely powerful incendiary with thermite-like temperatures at work
in the video. Of which, even if true, would be every bit as much
damning, since no such powerful indendiaries can be accounted for
without involving a sinister intent to plant them there.

Below are videos which contain some of this footage:

"Shot from street level of South Tower collapsing," CameraPlanet,
February 24, 2003

"Wtc 1, impact site close up, tower collapse close up, long shot,
people shouting," CameraPlanet, July 20, 2001

From the color of the yellow to white-hot molten metal seen cascading
off the South Tower, it had to be at least over 1000 °C, yet jet fuel
burns in open air at 260-315 °C; nor do any office, building, or plane
materials burn anywhere near that hot (indeed, it would present quite
a hazard if such articles were constructed with such powerful
incendiaries, and so designers of such objects go out of their way to
make sure that they are not). Thus, if it wasn't molten iron from
thermite that we are seeing come off the South Tower, then by
necessity a reaction source with a heat intensity very much like
thermite had to be present. Yet there is nothing in the U.S.
government's account that can explain such a heat source; indeed,
there's nothing innocent that could explain it, since it requires some
sort of extremely powerful incendiary.

For more on this, see Dr. Steven Jones's above-cited paper, "Why
Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?"

Moreover, even the official FEMA scientists Jonathan Barnett, Ronald
R. Biederman, and R. D. Sisson, Jr. bolster the evidence that thermate
(i.e., thermite with sulfur added, which causes it to slice through
steel even faster by forming a eutectic alloy with it) was used to
bring down the WTC towers (see "C Limited Metallurgical Examination,"
FEMA 403--World Trade Center Building Performance Study ):

Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel,
including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent inter granular
melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. ...
No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
The rate of corrosion is also unknown.


James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," revised and expanded
edition, June 1, 2006

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages