According to the memo (emphaseis added), "This agreement must be approved by City Council and signed by the City Manager to allow engineering to be completed and maintain delivery dates for the two-way reversion project. DOT has already begun design; the agreement must be signed prior to completing design on the two-way components. Delay could result in the project being shifted to a later DOT Work Plan."
That means that there's got to be a conceptual design out there somewhere, but it's nowhere to be found in the Council's packet.
This has come up as an issue with other MaineDOT projects – they tell the Council that they need to sign on the dotted line NOW or else risk losing the funding, but the public and the Council don't know important details about what MaineDOT is planning.
I've c'ed Jeremiah and Bruce in case they can share some useful details– I'm hoping they're in the loop. But more generally, we should really ask the City Council to demand more details in these projects, and more accountability from MaineDOT so that we know they're improving safety instead of just rebuilding the dangerous status quo.
Christian MilNeil
- - - - - - - - - - - - -