A Plan for the Capital Improvement Plan

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Winston Lumpkins

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 7:46:11 AM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com

I've been mulling over the Capital Improvement Plan.
There are 2 things I really want to see addressed, and I think the members of PBPAC may agree.

1. begin ordering extra sidewalk snow plows & a couple brush machines, so that next winter (2023/'24) we could begin to approach compliance with the city's own ordinance. (they take too long to deliver, so this winter is doomed to 3 day snow clearance).


2. At least partially fund the remainder of the Libbytown trail (AKA Union branch trail).


I've come up with a little plan to try our best to make these happen:

October:
Write an official PBPAC letter to the Manager & council asking that they find a way to work those 2 things into the budget.

Ask the list-serve to ask one friend who complains about snow removal or loves the Back bay trail & wishes it connected to the fore river parkway to email their councilors about it. Try to flood them with emails. Really see how many we can get.

November & December: Write an op-ed, Maine Voices column explaining why the sidewalks take 3 days to clear & what steps the city needs to take to comply with its own ordinance in a few years- AKA our sidewalk snow plow plan from last year, re-hashed as an op-ed.  Send after the election has blown over & they need something to print.
Renew pressure through emails & non-agenda public comment.

~Winston

Winston Lumpkins IV (he/him/his)

Chair, Portland Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee
https://www.portlandbikeped.org/

winston....@gmail.com
207-408-1508


Zack Barowitz

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 9:23:10 AM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
LUVVVVV IT!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Portland Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to PBPAC+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/PBPAC/CABaJc7zSvgePK7wzPvH9mMf-DiYJPcAbov1s9-%2B0oMg4nKdPPg%40mail.gmail.com.


--
917-696-5649
ZacharyBarowitz.com

ATTENTION:
The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential,
and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by
mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction,
distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform
the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
opening it.

Derek M. Strout

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 2:38:08 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Winston,

Can you point me/us to the CIP info on the Union Branch Trail? I’m very interested in this project (I’m the GIS Specialist for Rails-to-Trails Conservancy) but not seeing it in the latest plan here:

Thanks!
Derek

Scsmedia

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 5:49:14 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
I don't think this is even in the future CIP as a complete route has not been identified.  

Steven Scharf

Winston Lumpkins

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 6:15:29 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
It's possible I'm getting ahead of myself, in an attempt to get us ahead of the rather obscure CIP  process, which we seem to be behind more often than not...

They have funded a study for our portion of the trail, the route for which indeed might not have been confirmed- not sure what the timeline on that study is, but, I suppose if it's not completed by the end of this year, they can't exactly approve something which we don't yet know the precise price tag on yet.  I will email some city folks about that. 

Perhaps it doesn't fit into an ask for this year's CIP, which could rightly focus on the snow clearance issue alone...  Though we could say something like, as soon as the Study is completed, work it into the current CIP budget. 

It's just going to be so sad to be almost there, and then have to struggle through Saint John Street, go up congress against traffic etc....  Though bypassing Park Ave will be awesome & perhaps we could advocate for a temporary right hand, reverse direction bike lane up congress...

 ~Winston 



Scsmedia

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 6:33:21 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
I was answering Derek's question that it is not in the future plans at this point.  Does not mean that cost estimates don't exist.  Bruce Hyman needs to tell us where the information is.  Things that were never in the plan get added every year, usually, because some interest group does exactly what you are proposing.  It also usually happens behind closed doors.

Steven Scharf



Winston Lumpkins

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 7:01:30 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com

I've emailed Bruce, so hopefully we'll see what the progress is.  There's not much point in asking for something they plan on doing ;).  I don't think there's 7 sidewalk plows in there either, nor am I going to suggest we specify what model & price point of plow we ask for...

If we ask, and the study is in limbo or unfinished, they could always give it a better kick than we can... 

~Winston



Christian MilNeil

unread,
Sep 18, 2022, 9:37:20 PM9/18/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Great idea Winston – definitely appropriate to include Union Branch trail construction in this year's CIP, even without a final design in place.

Note that the last year's CIP budget (page 51) included over $2 million in local funds for a future Brighton Ave. reconstruction project, even though the concept design and cost of that project are still up in the air (and arguably are more uncertain than the Union Branch project).

More generally, I would love to organize some advocacy around the CIP – and its transportation items in particular – as the city's best venue to actually meet its climate goals, both in terms of building safer streets and more trail projects, and in terms of building more resilient infrastructure.


Christian MilNeil
- - - - - - - - - - - - -


Michael Dixon

unread,
Sep 19, 2022, 1:44:10 PM9/19/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Second (or third or fourth) the motion, plus the notion of expanding the CIP advocacy effort more generally.

(What IS the status of the Union Branch Corridor work?  And WHY is it taking so long?)

Also: WORLD CAR FREE DAY IS (on or about) THIS THURSDAY 9/22/22, not to mention related international Mobility Week and Breathe Life initiatives.

Maya Lena

unread,
Sep 19, 2022, 2:40:18 PM9/19/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
What happens to that $2 million for Brighton Ave. if it is not used this year? Does anyone have any additional updates about this project?

Scsmedia

unread,
Sep 19, 2022, 4:24:17 PM9/19/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
It sits in the CIP reserve fund until the project has been completed;  The city has millions sitting reserve fund for planned projects.  As projects get finished, the city council reallocates unspent funds to other projects or puts it back into the general reserve acct (almost never happens) which is are rainy day fund also referred to as the surplus acct.  It is usually one of the ancillary orders associated with passing the CIP budget.

Steven Scharf

Zack Barowitz

unread,
Sep 20, 2022, 6:58:14 AM9/20/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for that description Steven.

Winston Lumpkins

unread,
Sep 20, 2022, 12:33:25 PM9/20/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for those notes on process Steven, and for the questions everyone else! 

My understanding is that perhaps the whole trail from deering oaks park & marginal way connecting the Bayside Trail to the fore river trail might eventually be called the Libbytown trail, but, looking at it in the Maine DOT's work search tool (https://www.maine.gov/mdot/mapviewer/?show=Work%20Plan%2023-24%2cWork%20Plan%202022%2cHighway%20Corridor%20Priority&hide=Wetlands)
It's called the Union Branch Trail.

I've heard back from Bruce, he says:

"We are finalizing the scope and fee with the consultant now for the first phase (identifying the alignment to design). It should start within the next month after we get them under contract."

So it's still pretty early in the process, however, I think Brighton sets a pretty good precedent for setting aside money for infrastructure while it's still far in the future & the details have yet to be worked out.
Certainly, if they do include funding, that at least won't cause a slowdown once the study & engineering has been completed.  Ideally, probably from a fiscal perspective as well as a completionist perspective, it would all be done more or less at once- perhaps, as I think  we're doing for the engineering phase, we could even hire the same contractors the State hires for their portion to complete ours.  Maybe that's too optimistic, but I can't help but think it would be cheaper that way. 

It would at least make a lot more sense than coming back with someone else 2 years later, or just never funding our portion & throwing away any money we have allocated for design...

~Winston




Winston Lumpkins IV (he/him/his)

Chair, Portland Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee
https://www.portlandbikeped.org/

winston....@gmail.com
207-408-1508



Winston Lumpkins

unread,
Sep 21, 2022, 1:06:41 PM9/21/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com

I got a little more context on the Union Branch Trail & Brighton Ave through a quick call with Bruce:
=============
The $2 million for Brighton Ave is through PACTS (The Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System), for final design and construction. Significantly more construction funding will be needed than has been allocated so far. The design process for Brighton will hopefully start this fall or winter & will be managed by the DOT.

(Steven is right & money can sit in the CIP budget for some time- Brighton just isn't an example of this)

The design and construction of the Union Branch Trail from Forest Ave to Park Ave is fully funded- with construction 100% funded by MaineDOT, a rare happening, part of the land swap deal completed earlier this year. That section's construction won't include the trestle bridge. The likely timeline is: Summer/Fall 2023 design completed, project goes out to bid. Spring 2024 project begins construction.

From there the Libbytown Pathway, the second section connecting to the Portland transportation center, could run over the trestle bridge, along the CSX line to congress Street & to the fore river parkway via County way (also acquired by the City as part of the land swap), but that will depend on the new owner of CSX, as the city only owns up to the south end of the trestle bridge.

Otherwise, one possible alignment identified in 2017 would run along Park, to Marston street & down Fredric street to the Fore River Parkway. This would take longer, with its alignment decisions integrated into the Libbytown study, which is looking at whether Congress & Park should remain one way.    Either option is ideally a separated multi-use trail.

We have enough funds from the city and MaineDOT to determine which of those alignments we'll be designing for. We don't yet have money set aside for the full design process, but funding to fully fund the design process has already been applied for. We'll know in January 2023 if they have been approved by the Maine DOT.

Planning staff will be applying for construction funding for the Libbytown pathway segment (Park Ave to PTC) once an alignment and a more defined cost estimate has been determined. Right now there is a placeholder we put in last fall for $250,000 for a local match for a future grant application for FY25 (in the FY23-28 document).   Likely, it will be funded through grants of some kind- PACTS, DOT, or federal reconnecting communities money (as Libbytown has been pretty thoroughly divided by 295). Of course we will have to cover 20-25% of the cost through matching funds.. 
==============


I had thought that the city might have to pay for the entirety of this second section of the trail.   Fortunately, we probably won't. 

Strategically, I think we should probably focus on the sidewalk snowplow issue for the CIP Budget letter.  We'll continue following the progress of the Libbytown Pathway, ready to advocate for it once necessary.  I would hope that, should we have funding for 75 or 80% of its construction from gants, the council would fund the rest pretty happily, but it's still worth monitoring closely. 

~Winston


Derek M. Strout

unread,
Sep 21, 2022, 1:44:37 PM9/21/22
to PB...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for this update, Winston, much appreciated!

Derek

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages