Quarterly Report on Pending Interferences

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Chico Gholz

unread,
Jan 2, 2022, 10:56:30 AM1/2/22
to Rick's List-Serve (patentlaw@googlegroups.com), Tia D. Fenton, Eric W. Schweibenz

(1)    Zombies:  There is no interference in the period for filing a petition for certiorari.

 

(2)    On petition for certiorari:  There is no petition for certiorari from a Federal Circuit decision in an interference pending.

 

(3)    On appeal to the Federal Circuit:  There are three interferences on appeal to the Federal Circuit:  106,087; 106,109; and 106,123.

 

(4)    Decided but not appealed:  There is no interference that has been decided by the board but not appealed to the Federal Circuit.

 

(5)    Awaiting decision in the first phase:  There are three interferences awaiting decision in the first phase:  106,125; 106,126; and 106,127.

 

(6)    Awaiting decision in the second phase:  There is one interference awaiting decision in the second phase:  106,115.

 

(7)    Awaiting decision on remand from the Federal Circuit:  There is no interference awaiting decision on remand from the Federal Circuit.

 

(8)    Pending in the first phase:  There are four interferences pending in the first phase:  106,130; 106, 132; 106,133; and 106,135.

 

(9)    Pending in the second phase:  There is one interference pending in the second phase:  106,119.

 

(10)Pending but no publically available information  There are two interferences pending for which there is no publically available information:  106,100 and 106,131.

 

Total:  There are fourteen pending interferences, the same number as in my two previous quarterly reports.

 

 

 

 

Chico Gholz
Senior Counsel

Direct:6485

 


Chico Gholz
Senior Counsel

1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Phone:703-412-6485 | Fax: 703-413-2220
CGh...@oblon.com | www.oblon.com


This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Oblon by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Chico Gholz

unread,
Jan 2, 2022, 5:10:42 PM1/2/22
to for users of EFS-Web and patent practitioners generally, Carl Oppedahl, Rick's List-Serve (patentlaw@googlegroups.com), Neifeld, Rick

Sure.  Here are both the address of the list serve and Rick’s business email address.

 

                CHICO

 

 

From: Efs-web [mailto:efs-web...@oppedahl-lists.com] On Behalf Of Carl Oppedahl via Efs-web
Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 4:57 PM
To: for users of EFS-Web and patent practitioners generally
Cc: Carl Oppedahl
Subject: Re: [Efs-web-L] Quarterly Report on Pending Interferences

 

Can you tell us how to subscribe to Rick's listserv?

On 1/2/2022 2:26 PM, Chico Gholz via Efs-web wrote:

                Perhaps I should explain that EIC Sofocleous explained years ago on Rick’s list serve that interference numbers are assigned when a prospective/possible interference first reaches the board, not when an interference is declared, so the fact that Int. No. 106,131 has an interference number between interferences that were declared on  26 January 2021 and 21 June 2021 does not guarantee that it was declared between those two dates.

 

                CHICO

 

 

From: Efs-web [mailto:efs-web...@oppedahl-lists.com] On Behalf Of Chico Gholz via Efs-web
Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 4:05 PM
To: 'for users of EFS-Web and patent practitioners generally'
Cc: Chico Gholz; Eric W. Schweibenz; Tia D. Fenton
Subject: Re: [Efs-web-L] Quarterly Report on Pending Interferences

 

                There were at least four new interferences declared in 2021 (106,130 on 26 January 2021; 106,132 on 21 June 2921; 106,133 on 21 June 2021; and 106,135 on 26 August 2021) and five if Int. No. 106,131 was also declared in 2021, so it would not be surprising if more interferences were declared in 2022.

 

                CHICO

 

 

From: Efs-web [mailto:efs-web...@oppedahl-lists.com] On Behalf Of Carl Oppedahl via Efs-web
Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 12:58 PM
To: Chico Gholz via Efs-web
Cc: Carl Oppedahl
Subject: Re: [Efs-web-L] Quarterly Report on Pending Interferences

 

By the way, you probably already explained this, but is it now a ratchet-down?  That is, are things now such that the number of interferences can only only go down and cannot go up?  Is it impossible in 2022 for a new interference to come into existence?

Or could there for example still conceivably be two pending patent applications even now in 2022 that have been pending since before the AIA happened, where an interference could be provoked and could then come into existence?  Or maybe two reissues of pre-AIA cases, something like that, that could come into a new interference with each other?

On 1/2/2022 9:03 AM, Chico Gholz via Efs-web wrote:

1.       Zombies:  There is no interference in the period for filing a petition for certiorari.

 

2.       On petition for certiorari:  There is no petition for certiorari from a Federal Circuit decision in an interference pending.

 

3.       On appeal to the Federal Circuit:  There are three interferences on appeal to the Federal Circuit:  106,087; 106,109; and 106,123.

 

4.       Decided but not appealed:  There is no interference that has been decided by the board but not appealed to the Federal Circuit.

 

5.       Awaiting decision in the first phase:  There are three interferences awaiting decision in the first phase:  106,125; 106,126; and 106,127.

 

6.       Awaiting decision in the second phase:  There is one interference awaiting decision in the second phase:  106,115.

 

7.       Awaiting decision on remand from the Federal Circuit:  There is no interference awaiting decision on remand from the Federal Circuit.

 

8.       Pending in the first phase:  There are four interferences pending in the first phase:  106,130; 106, 132; 106,133; and 106,135.

 

9.       Pending in the second phase:  There is one interference pending in the second phase:  106,119.

 

10.   Pending but no publically available information  There are two interferences pending for which there is no publically available information:  106,100 and 106,131.

 

Total:  There are fourteen pending interferences, the same number as in my two previous quarterly reports.

 

 

 

 

Chico Gholz
Senior Counsel

Direct:6485

 

 

Chico Gholz
Senior Counsel

1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Phone:703-412-6485 | Fax: 703-413-2220
CGh...@oblon.com | www.oblon.com

 

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Oblon by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PatentLaw" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to patentlaw+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/patentlaw/712d372474f9462e86354ce57ed4e0a6%40oblon.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

_______________________________________________
Efs-web mailing list
Efs...@oppedahl-lists.com
To unsubscribe, or to learn about list options, visit http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/efs-web_oppedahl-lists.com



_______________________________________________
Efs-web mailing list
Efs...@oppedahl-lists.com
To unsubscribe, or to learn about list options, visit http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/efs-web_oppedahl-lists.com

Chico Gholz

unread,
Jan 3, 2022, 1:24:33 PM1/3/22
to guyv...@flash.net, for users of EFS-Web and patent practitioners generally, Rick's List-Serve, RICK NEIFELD
Ask Rick Neifeld.  He maintains the list serve.



On: 03 January 2022 13:08,
"guyv...@flash.net" <guyv...@flash.net> wrote:

I must not have done it right, trying to subscribe.  Google says I’m not part of the club and bounced the email.

Could I have the Cliff’s Notes version of how to subscribe?

 

Thanks.

 

Guy

 

 

Guy V. Manning
LAW OFFICES OF GUY V. MANNING
Intellectual Property Attorneys – Patent, Copyright, Trademark 
4200 S. Hulen Street, Suite 603      Voice  (817) 294-7744 

Fort Worth, Texas 76109  USA        Fax     (817) 294-7742 
guyv...@gvmlaw.net 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This e-mail is meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

AVISO AL RECEPTOR: Este mensaje tiene por destinatario exclusivo a la persona o entidad a la que está dirigida, y puede contener información confidencial y que no puede divulgarse. Si usted recibió este mensaje por error, le está prohibido divulgar, distribuir o copiar la información aquí contenida. Le agradeceremos que nos notifique del error inmediatamente por e-mail de respuesta y que borre este mensaje de su sistema. Muchas gracias por adelantado por su cooperación.

AVISO AO RECIPIENTE: Este e-mail é destinado apenas ao destinatário da transmissão e pode conter informações protegidas por lei. Caso você tenha recebido este e-mail por engano, fica absolutamente proibida a sua revisão, uso, disseminação, distribuição ou cópia. Por favor avise-nos imediatamente do erro e por favor, exclua a mensagem de seu sistema. Desde já agradeçemos sua cooperação.

HINWEIS FÜR DEN EMPFÄNGER: Dieses e-mail ist für das Erhalten des Empfängers bezweckt und kann unter dem Gesetz als vertrauliche Kommunikation gelten. Wenn Sie dieses e-mail versehentlich bekommen haben sollten, jegliche Prüfung, Weiterleitung, Verbreitung oder anderweitige Verwendung sowie kopieren ist strengstens verboten. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns sofort des Fehlers in dem Sie diese e-mail zurück senden und bitte löschen Sie diese Nachricht von ihrem System. Vielen Dank im Voraus für Ihre Mitarbeit.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages