PatentLaw

"in any country" is one thing specified and "all rights" is another thing

here's an article about DOCX and Patent Center that ran on Law360 yesterday, quoting Boundy,

Colleagues - Authy is the 2FA Authenticator App I have used for years due to its end to end

Zombies: There is no interference in the period for filing a petition for certiorari. On petition for

Zombies: There is no interference in the period for filing a petition for certiorari. On petition for

The final letter is at https://ssrn.com/abstract=4597405 I got so much help from so many people --

Dear Listmates: Last ask for signatures for the letter re decommission of Private PAIR and EFS-Web. I

Don't both of those things have to be raised, either as a defense or in a complaint? CHICO Oblon,

While not patent law, this holding in copyright law is significant. I copy the most relevant

Dear Colleagues -- Thank you to 152 who signed a letter re DOCX (I think that's a record). The

Item 1. If you haven't already done so, please circulate this email within your firm, and to

Dear Colleagues -- We're at 100 signatures! Letter due Monday, I will cut off signatures at 3PM (

FYI - The relevant excerpts from SNIPR. Because the text, purpose, and history of the AIA make clear

Does anyone see any significant new point of law in this decision? The following may be a new point

Inguran is an interesting decision dealing with claim preclusion. I review the decision here: https:/

Zombies: There are no interferences in the period for filing a petition for certiorari. On petition

The proposed rules published today. Title: "Discretionary Institution Practices, Petition Word-

VA Bar thought that had fixed their new website. But it is still broken, and I let them know that

Chico - Why is it that "there is no publicly available information" for two interferences?

In HAWK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, LLC v. CASTLE RETAIL, LLC, 22-1222 (Fed. Cir. 2/17/2023), today, the

In Minerva, today, the Federal Circuit concluded that the “accessible to the public” element of

My summaries of relevant new law follow. SSI Technologies, LLC v. Dongguan Zhengyang Electronic

This decision relates to structural issues with PTAB proceedings. My review and excerpts of points of

David - You might appreciate the facts that the answers to questions regarding the meaning of "

Prosecution Laches - The majority found no clear error in the district court finding of prejudice

I believe you would have to ask management about assignment of current panels. Maybe they are

This is an interesting case, clarifying the boundary of the collateral order doctrine relating to

Mark Polutta and Greg Vidovich have egg on faces (well, actually something else). Give them a face-

Awesome news, David! Thanks again for all of your hard work on this. Your relentless drive to make

Unfortunately, the first few paragraphs refer to EFS when they appear to be talking about ECF. That