FW: Court case for grand parents

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Marius Janse van Rensburg

unread,
Apr 16, 2008, 3:21:32 AM4/16/08
to pas-s...@googlegroups.com

 

Zelda Venter
    April 02 2008 at 12:13PM

 

In a potentially groundbreaking case for the rights of grandparents, a Mpumalanga couple are asking the Pretoria High Court to grant them access to their five-month-old granddaughter.

The baby's mother is in Grade 12 and the child's father (the couple's son) died in a motorbike accident a few days before the child's birth. He was 19.

The Carolina couple (who are not identified to protect the mother and baby) are desperate to spend some time with their only grandchild.

Although grandparents do not have an automatic right of access to their grandchildren, the couple claim it is in the girl's best interest to get to know her family.

Mother and baby often stayed with them, until the end of November last year

They are basing their case on the constitution and on the Children's Act. The constitution states that a child's best interest is of paramount importance in any matter that concerns the child. The object of the Children's Act, the court was told, was to preserve and strengthen families.

Judge Willie Seriti was told that if it was in the best interests of a child, the child's family must be given the opportunity to express their views in any matter concerning the child. It was also argued that there was a need for the child to maintain a connection with her family and extended family.

The grandparents said they were bringing this application on behalf of their granddaughter, as it would be in her best interests to know them. They said the baby has a constitutional and statutory right to be protected and to be allowed to know, bond and remain in contact with her paternal grandparents and extended family.

Their son and the child's mother met in 2006. On October 12 last year the baby was born.

Their relationship with the child's mother was always good.

The grandfather had made "unreasonable demands and insisted on taking the baby"

She lived with her grandmother (the child's great-grandmother). The couple said mother and baby often stayed with them, until the end of November last year, when things changed.

The mother accused the grandparents of "having a hidden agenda to adopt her baby".

Apart from allowing them to see the child once in the past month, the mother refused them any access. They said they had no agenda to adopt the child, they only wanted to see the child occasionally.

The mother stated that her love for the child's father was "mere puppy love" and claimed that the father wanted her to have an abortion.

His parents however, told him to take responsibility for what he had done. She said their relationship was a sham after that.

She said she and the child's grandparents had a good relationship until the grandfather had made "unreasonable demands and insisted on taking the baby".

The mother said she could not see how allowing the grandparents to have access to the baby could be in the child's best interests.

Carina du Toit of the Centre for Child Law at the University of Pretoria, said a court would have to determine whether it was in the best interest of the child to have access to the grandparents.

While the courts have expressed in several judgements that grandparents do not have an automatic right in this regard, the new Children's Act favours such contact if it is in the best interest of the child.


    • This article was originally published on page 3 of Pretoria News on April 02, 2008

 



 

 

 

 

 

 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.23.0/1379 - Release Date: 2008/04/15 06:10 PM

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages