Hi everyone,
I’m a postdoc at CU Boulder and I've been using ParFlow.CLM with weather forcing inputs at both hourly and 5-minute intervals. The reason we wanted to use 5-minute forcing was to incorporate urban irrigation occurring at a sub-hourly timescale. To test the setup, I ran the model for a month with each time scale, and found higher water balance errors at the 5-minute timescale than the hourly timescale, which we suspect is related to the time setting of CLM. Specifically:
1. Hourly forcing dataset: The cumulative water balance error for both CLM and ParFlow is very low. At 189 h:
CLMabsErr_cum (Cumulative absolute error calculated from CLM outputs) = 0 mm, CLMrelErr_cum (Cumulative relative error calculated from CLM outputs) = 0
I calculated the CLM error as follows:
CLMforce_cum = precip_cum (cumulative precipitation)
CLMcalc_cum = dcan_cum (cumulative canopy interception) + dsno_cum (cumulative snow water equivalent) + ev_cum (cumulative evaporation) + tr_cum (cumulative transpiration) + etS_cum (cumulative EvapTranssum output)
CLMabsErr_cum = CLMforce_cum - CLMcalc_cum
CLMrelErr_cum = CLMabsErr_cum/CLMforce_cum
2. 5-minute forcing dataset: The input is based on 5-minute forcing dataset and the model printed hourly outputs. At 189 h:
CLMabsErr_cum = 0.04 mm, CLMrelErr_cum = 0.004
For ParFlow with the 5-minute simulation, we used these time settings:
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Timing Information
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pfset TimingInfo.BaseUnit 0.08333333 #(5min/60 min)
pfset TimingInfo.StartCount 0
pfset TimingInfo.StartTime 0
pfset TimingInfo.StopTime 744 # (31 days *24 h)
pfset TimingInfo.DumpInterval 1
pfset TimeStep.Type Constant
pfset TimeStep.Value 0.08333333
For CLM, the only adjustment I made was:
pfset Solver.CLM.CLMDumpInterval 1 # hourly output
In both cases, the ParFlow time unit in the tcl is hour. I couldn't find a key in the manual that explicitly defines the CLM time step, and assumed initially that the CLM time step comes from the ParFlow time step. I am wondering if CLM can properly handle sub-hourly weather forcing. I found only 2 examples of previous work that used sub-hourly ParFlow.CLM simulations:
1 – Gupta, A., et al. (2019), with tcl file and repository we referred to. 2- Baroni, G., et al. (2019).
I would appreciate any suggestions or recommendations on using sub-hourly weather forcing for CLM.
I've also attached the tcl file, and drv files for your reference.
Thank you,
Zahra Amiri
Postdoctoral Associate
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering
University of Colorado Boulder