A First Course In Linear Algebra Pdf

[Sabina Kehler]

AFirst Course in Linear Algebra is an introductory textbook designed for university sophomores and juniors. Typically such a student will have taken calculus, but this is not a prerequisite. The book begins with systems of linear equations, then covers matrix algebra, before taking up finite-dimensional vector spaces in full generality. The final chapter covers matrix representations of linear transformations, through diagonalization, change of basis and Jordan canonical form. Along the way, determinants and eigenvalues get fair time. There is a comprehensive online edition and PDF versions are available to download for printing or on-screen viewing. Physical copies may be purchased from the print-on-demand service at Lulu.com.

This textbook has more freedom than most (but see some exceptions). First, there is no cost to acquire this text, and you are under no obligation whatsoever to compensate or donate to the author or publisher. So in this most basic sense, it is a free textbook. Therefore you can also make as many copies as you like, ensuring that the book will never go out-of-print. You may modify copies of the book for your own use - for example, you may wish to change to a prefered notation for certain objects or add a few new sections. I have applied a copyright to the book, and subsequently licensed it with a GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). It is this combination that allows me to give you greater freedoms in how you use the text, thus liberating it from some of the antiquated notions of copyright that apply to books in physical form. The main caveat is that if you make modifications and then distribute a modified version, you are required to again apply the GFDL license to the result so that others may benefit from your modifications.

It is hoped that by this arrangement, others will help improve the book through rapid correction of errors and contributions of exercises and new material. Examine an evaluation copy, and if you like what you see, consider a donation or purchase to support this experiment in providing quality textbooks at reasonable prices.

Can anyone suggest a relatively gentle linear algebra text that integrates vector spaces and matrix algebra right from the start? I've found in the past that students react in very negative ways to the introduction of abstract vector spaces mid-way through a course. Sometimes it feels as though I've walked into class and said "Forget math. Let's learn ancient Greek instead." Sometimes the students realize that Greek is interesting too, but it can take a lot of convincing! Hence I would really like to let students know, right from the start, what they're getting themselves into.

Does anyone know of a text that might help me do this in a not-too-advanced manner? One possibility, I guess, is Linear Algebra Done Right by Axler, but are there others? Axler's book might be too advanced.

For teaching the type of course that Dan described, I'd like to recommend David Lay's "Linear algebra". It is very thoroughly thought out and well written, with uniform difficulty level, some applications, and several possible routes/courses that he explains in the instructor's edition. Vector spaces are introduced in Chapter 4, following the chapters on linear systems, matrices, and determinants. Due to built-in redundancy, you can get there earlier, but I don't see any advantage to that. The chapter on matrices has a couple of sections that "preview" abstract linear algebra by studying the subspaces of $\mathbbR^n$.

I rather like Linear Algebra Done Right, and depending on the type of students you are aiming the course for, I would recommend it over Hoffman and Kunze. Since you seemed worried that Axler might be too advanced, my feeling is that Hoffman and Kunze will definitely be (especially if these are students who have never been taught proof-based mathematics).

Hands-down, my favorite text is Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra. Chapter 1 is a review of matrices. From then on, everything is integrated. The abstract definition of a vector space is introduced in chapter 2 with a review of field theory. Chapter 3 is all about abstract linear transformations as well as the representation of such transformations as matrices. I'm not going to recount all of the chapters for you, but it seems to be exactly what you want. It's also very flexible for teaching a course. It includes sections on modules and derives the determinant both classically and using the exterior algebra. Normed spaces and inner product spaces are introduced in the second half of the book, and do not depend on some of the more "algebraic" sections (like those mentioned above on modules, tensors, and the exterior algebra).

From what I've been told, H&K has been the standard linear algebra text for the past 30 or so years, although universities have been phasing it out in recent years in favor of more "colorful" books with more emphasis on applications.

Edit: One last thing. I have not heard great things about Axler. While the book achieves its goals of avoiding bases and matrices for almost the entire book, I have heard that students who have taken a course modeled on Axler have a very hard time computing determinants and don't gain a sufficient level of competence with explicit computations using bases, which are also important. Based on your question, it seems like Axler's approach would have exactly the same problems you currently have, but going in the "opposite direction", as it were.

There were times when I was rather fond of Strang's Linear Algebra and Its Applications. I haven't looked at it for a long time, but back then I found it very clear and appealing. Even if you don't follow the book chapter by chapter, it might still give you ideas.

There is no ideal text for a beginning one semester course as taughtin the US to first or second year college students. Older books like H&K treat only the abstract theory, in a fairly conceptual way and (if I recallcorrectly) with maps written on the right contrary to what students do incalculus. A later generation of books like the original Anton are alsopure math books but start by overemphasizing unrealistic manipulations withsmall matrices and vectors; then there is an abrupt shift to abstraction.Determinants are presented in a purely computational mode, as though theywere really used for this purpose; then eigenvalues occur very late and againin oversimplified small examples. Fortunately the newer texts tend to mixpure and applied throughout, but as a result they contain far too much materialfor a first course. And eigenvalue theory still gets introduced very late.Strang is attractive in many ways, but too loosely written down and not suitable for an inexperienced reader without a reliable guide at hand. Asidefrom Strang, the emphasis in most US textbooks remains placed on unrealisticinteger calculations with very small matrices rather than on the geometry ofsubspaces, etc. The pervasive role of geometric thinking in the subject ismostly downplayed in texts, as is the role of analysis. For self-study,something like Friedberg-Insel-Spence may be the best compromise choice.

My old mentor Nick Metas was part of the teams of graduate students who worked over the drafts of H&K when they were writing it for the linear algebra course at MIT in the 1960's. That being said,despite its' rigor and beauty, I think a "pure" linear algebra course is just as big a mistake as a pure theoretical calculus course no matter how good the students are. It's like teaching music students all about pentamer, note grammar and acoustics and never teaching them how to play a single note. I don't go for this whole pure/applied distinction, it's an idiotic consequence of this age of specialization. I love rigor,but applications should never be denied or ignored. That's why my overall favorite LA text is Friedberg, Insel and Spence-it's the only one I've seen that aims for and hits a terrific balance between algebraic theory and applications. I also love Curtis for similar reasons, but it's coverage isn't as broad. I love books that aim for that Grand Mean Balance-sadly, in America, there aren't anywhere near enough such texts.

If you are looking for a gentle introduction, that uses matrices from the beginning, I would suggest you consider "Linear Algebra" by Friedberg, Insel and Spence. I haven't used this book myself, but somebody (I trust) recommended this book to me. I now own it, and it looks very nice and gentle (but covering all the topics I would like to include), and matrices are introduced in page 8.

My personal pick is I.M.Gelfand's "Lectures on linear algebra" (link to a copy on Google Books), accompanied by two warnings: (1) the part "Introduction to tensors" is far from perfect; (2) the proof of the Jordan normal form theorem is dramatically outdated (keep in mind that the only English translation of the book is that of the 1950s edition - the latest editions contain a proof that totally makes sense). Then again, many linear algebra textbooks simply avoid Jordan normal forms completely (which I think is a mild disaster).

The best thing about Hoffman and Kunze's book is its beautiful exposition of Jordan Forms. If a course is planning to get to Jordan Forms as a target then I can't think of any better approach than that in Hoffman and Kunze.

Explanation of concepts like conductors and annihilators, invariant polynomials and variations/equivalence between notions of semi-simplicity and myriad of different ways to test diagonalizability of a linear transformation are I would say the claim to fame for Hoffman and Kunze's book. And all this merges beautifully in their writing of Jordan forms, as if everything else was written just to make this concept clear.

I apologize for plugging my own text, but I think that "Introduction to Linear, Ideas and Applications" by Richard Penney might be exactly what the questioner is looking for. It is relatively gentle and it does integrate vector spaces and matrix algebra from the get go. When I have taught from it the question of "what is a vector space" has never been an issue.

3a8082e126