Re: Review Request 4385: Adds documentation for running scala tests

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stu Hood

unread,
Nov 16, 2016, 4:15:02 PM11/16/16
to Stu Hood, pants-reviews, Dave Brewster
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4385/

Ship it!

Thanks!

Would be good to actually mention the fully-qualified class to extend... (and ditto for the RunWith mention, maybe?)


examples/src/java/org/pantsbuild/example/README.md (Diff revision 1)
75
> testing framework automatically picks up scala tests and runs them

s/picks up scala tests/picks up tests that extend org.scalatest.Suite/


- Stu Hood


On November 16th, 2016, 9:08 p.m. UTC, Dave Brewster wrote:

Review request for pants-reviews and Stu Hood.
By Dave Brewster.

Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 9:08 p.m.

Bugs: 4064
Repository: pants

Description

Adds documentation for running scala tests to both the JVM area and the scala area

Diffs

  • examples/src/java/org/pantsbuild/example/README.md (a004f35ae9660ed3ab5d400dab61e856d0ef0bbf)
  • examples/src/scala/org/pantsbuild/example/README.md (be54a6dd09e4d46687c7c872f484403eef5af3b9)

View Diff

John Sirois

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 9:58:01 PM11/17/16
to Stu Hood, pants-reviews, Dave Brewster, John Sirois
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4385/

This broke CI both in the PR, and of course when it landed on master. I'm preparing the revert here: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4390/

- John Sirois


On November 16th, 2016, 2:40 p.m. MST, Dave Brewster wrote:

Review request for pants-reviews and Stu Hood.
By Dave Brewster.

Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 2:40 p.m.

John Sirois

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 10:22:45 PM11/17/16
to Stu Hood, pants-reviews, Dave Brewster, John Sirois
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4385/

On November 17th, 2016, 7:58 p.m. MST, John Sirois wrote:

This broke CI both in the PR, and of course when it landed on master. I'm preparing the revert here: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4390/
Actually, here: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4391/
The break was indirect.

- John

John Sirois

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 10:23:02 PM11/17/16
to Stu Hood, pants-reviews, Dave Brewster, John Sirois
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4385/

On November 17th, 2016, 7:58 p.m. MST, John Sirois wrote:

This broke CI both in the PR, and of course when it landed on master. I'm preparing the revert here: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4390/

On November 17th, 2016, 8:22 p.m. MST, John Sirois wrote:

Actually, here: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/4391/
The break was indirect.
(... no revert Dave!)

- John

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages