Hi Bruno, Brian an eveybody else:
1) Thanks Bruno for darifying your final decision: Quoting your last mesage
"my final decision is to REMOVE the vote he gave to himself, leaving all others as they are".
If so, I completely agree and accept your decision, realising how difficult is the trouble. I suggest to include into the future month rules a line for clarfying this situation as the majoity of participants would decide: Invalidity, asking for reconsideration, or just disregarding their own vote.
2) Many thanks Brian for realising that a vote has been cast by a voter who was not registered at Panoramio one month earlier that the NPC start. In this case, I think there is no doubt about the decision: The rules are cristal clear, as the rule number 4 says:
"4. Posting a Vote: any Panoramio user with the exception of #4g below may vote by leaving a single posting in the contest forum topic using the same user account of their entry if an entrant, within the time frame of rule #1b.
a) list the entry numbers of the photographs for which you want to vote - for example: 2,5,12,33,50
b) total choices are limited: 5 if < 60 entries, 6 if < 70, 7 if < 80, 8 if < 90, 9 if < 100, and 10 if 100 or more
c) minimum number of votes: 5 no matter how many entries
d) you may only vote once for any one photo; any repeated entry numbers are ignored
e) you must change your original vote posting to change your vote
f) any postings after the first by any one user will be removed by moderators
g) non-contestants who wish to vote must be registered at least a month before the start of the contest and must have uploaded at least 10 photos
h) this is not a presidential election - you cannot vote for yourself! Not voting is preferable. "
Accodingly, I think that there is no room for discussion:
The votation of
baiyunheitu, posted: 15 Nov 2008 12:15 pm must be declared INVALID because he was regsitered at PANORAMIO on 11 Oct 2008, less than 1 month earlier the November NPC started
It is clear that this decison is against my entry final score, but this is completely secondary: Fairplay is first.
Thanks everbody for your opinions that helped in solving the situation
Very happy

because I verify the high level of transparency reached at the NPC and stil anxious and exicted for the uncentain final result, allways wishing everybody best regards and a pleasant sunday from **4Ullas**