> The upgrade went fine thanks, despite the numerous warning messages I
> saw flash by the terminal (it might be helpful to mention in the
> future if those are expected so we don't worry when we see them?).
What warning messages? Without seeing them I don't know if they were
expected or not...
Can you send me the contents of /var/log/panda-upgrade.log?
> Is 1.2 more resource-intensive than 1.0? I'm running a test
> implementation using an AWS micro instance. I know that's not
> recommended for production use, but for now we've just got a dozen or
> so small data sets and 3 active users (although I set up some other
> accounts that haven't been used yet). I don't want to commit to a $900/
> year unless I'm sure folks here want and would use this, which is why
> it's still on a micro instance. It seems significantly slower now than
> 1.0 was.
In a manner of speaking, yes. We doubled the amount of RAM dedicated
to the search engine, which on a micro is basically all the RAM on the
system. I suspect that as a result your system is swapping to disk
much more frequently, which would make everything slow. We do provide
some documentation that loosely explains how to scale that up and
down:
http://panda.readthedocs.org/en/latest/performance.html
However, I would just reiterate that we have no plans to support micro
instances, so the problem is likely to only get worse with future
releases. For example, we also introduced import throttling and
various other features into this release which may be aggravating the
problem.
Best,
Chris
Chris
We just installed v 1.2 here at GGMC and are unable to add users.
The page /admin/auth/user/add/ returns a HTTP 500 error. Other admin add pages (Categories, Tasks, Api keys) seem to work OK