Hello,
I am trying to better understand how model 0 (i.e., one-ratio model) works in the branch models.
Namely, when I run identical replicates of the same alignment and same input parameters, I get identical ML estimates of omega, and identical log-likelihood values, but only when I use model 0.
When I perform identical replicate runes using model 1 (free-ratio model) or model 2 (>1 ratio model), I get slightly different estimates of omega, and slightly different log-likelihood values.
This latter scenario is what I expected. That is, sampling different parts of the ML plane should yield slight variations depending on the starting location (i.e., random seed). So the lack of variation in MLEs and lnLs in model 0 is a bit concerning to me.
Is this because model 0 is a simple calculation, rather than true ML search? Or perhaps because there is only a single free parameter, it is not possible to search the ML space at all?
I've tested this on many thousands of gene alignments (including single-gene and concatenated alignments), >3 different machines, all with different architectures/operating systems, and with three different paml versions (v4.8, v4.9, and v4.9j) all with identical results.
Thanks!
Joel